Air 2011 Sc 1150 - Law Dictionary Search Results

Issued and served

was interpreted by Courts to mean 'served', Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Kundan Lal Behari Lal, AIR 1976 SC 1150: (1975) 4 SCC 844 [Wealth Tax Act, 1957, s. 18 (2A)]

bound under an agreement to pay the compensation, Himalaya Tiles and Merbles (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Countinho, AIR 1980 SC 1118 (1120): (1980) 3 SCC 233: (1980) 3 SCR 235. [Land Acquisition Act, 1844, s. 18]

Material facts

or defendant's defence in written statement, Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. v. Owner & Parties Vessel M.V. Forture Express, 2006 AIR (SC) 1828: (2006) 3 SCC 100: (2006) 2 JT 48: (2006) 2 SCALE 30: (2006) 1 Supreme 677:

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Try free for 7 days See all features

Furtherance

Furtherance, The dictionary meaning of the word 'furtherance' is, advancement or promotion, Shankarlal Kacharabhai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1965 SC 1260: (1965) 1 SCR 287. [Penal Code 1860, S. 34] See also 2004 Cri LJ 3328

Property

against the tenants is undoubtedly a species of property which is assignable, State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh, AIR 1952 SC 252. Comprises every form of tangible property, even intangible, including debts and chooses in action such

Law

abstract or general sense embodying the principles of natural justice, A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27: (1950) SCR 88. It is manifest that the law must satisfy two tests before it can be … Order, 2(1)(c) of Adaptation of Sikkim Laws (No. 1) order, 1975, Kunga Nima Lepcha v. State of Sikkim, AIR 2006 Sikkim 1. The law of foreign countries is a question of fact in English Courts. See FOREIGN

Manufacture

must emerge having a distinctive name, character or use, Union of India v. Delhi Cloth and General Mills, AIR 1963 SC 791. Implies a change, but every change is not manufacture and yet every change of an

Shall

the word 'shall' occurs and the other circumstances, Ramnath Narayana Mauzo of Margoa v. Union Government of India, AIR 1968 Goa 85. Shall, does not always mean that the enactment is obligatory or mandatory. It depends upon … all to be considered before condemning a violation as fatal, State of Punjab v. Shamlal Murari, (1976) 1 SCC 719. Shall, does not always mean that an act is obligatory or mandatory and it depends upon the

Judgment

nor does it terminate or dispose of the suit on any ground, Asrumati Debi v. Rupendra Deb Raikot, AIR 1953 SC 198: (1953) SCR 1159. An order of committal which terminates the pro-ceeding so far as the

Person

Hindu Undivided Family is a person, Kshetra Mohan-Sannyasi Charan Sadhukhan v. Commissioner of Excess Profit Tax, West Bengal, AIR 1953 SC 516. According to company law it does not mean an unregistered firm, Firm Pannaji v. Devichand

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days