Air 2010 Sc 327 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Person interested
bound under an agreement to pay the compensation, Himalaya Tiles and Merbles (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Countinho, AIR 1980 SC 1118 (1120): (1980) 3 SCC 233: (1980) 3 SCR 235. [Land Acquisition Act, 1844, s. 18]
Material facts
or defendant's defence in written statement, Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. v. Owner & Parties Vessel M.V. Forture Express, 2006 AIR (SC) 1828: (2006) 3 SCC 100: (2006) 2 JT 48: (2006) 2 SCALE 30: (2006) 1 Supreme 677:
Furtherance
Furtherance, The dictionary meaning of the word 'furtherance' is, advancement or promotion, Shankarlal Kacharabhai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1965 SC 1260: (1965) 1 SCR 287. [Penal Code 1860, S. 34] See also 2004 Cri LJ 3328
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Property
against the tenants is undoubtedly a species of property which is assignable, State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh, AIR 1952 SC 252. Comprises every form of tangible property, even intangible, including debts and chooses in action such
Law
abstract or general sense embodying the principles of natural justice, A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27: (1950) SCR 88. It is manifest that the law must satisfy two tests before it can be … Order, 2(1)(c) of Adaptation of Sikkim Laws (No. 1) order, 1975, Kunga Nima Lepcha v. State of Sikkim, AIR 2006 Sikkim 1. The law of foreign countries is a question of fact in English Courts. See FOREIGN
Manufacture
must emerge having a distinctive name, character or use, Union of India v. Delhi Cloth and General Mills, AIR 1963 SC 791. Implies a change, but every change is not manufacture and yet every change of an
Shall
the word 'shall' occurs and the other circumstances, Ramnath Narayana Mauzo of Margoa v. Union Government of India, AIR 1968 Goa 85. Shall, does not always mean that the enactment is obligatory or mandatory. It depends upon … all to be considered before condemning a violation as fatal, State of Punjab v. Shamlal Murari, (1976) 1 SCC 719. Shall, does not always mean that an act is obligatory or mandatory and it depends upon the
Reason to believe
belief must be held in good faith; it cannot be merely a pretence, S. Narayanappa v. CIT, Bangalore, AIR 1967 SC 523: (1967) 65 ITR 219: 1967 1 SCJ 161. Reason to believe, does not mean a
Person
Hindu Undivided Family is a person, Kshetra Mohan-Sannyasi Charan Sadhukhan v. Commissioner of Excess Profit Tax, West Bengal, AIR 1953 SC 516. According to company law it does not mean an unregistered firm, Firm Pannaji v. Devichand
Judgment
nor does it terminate or dispose of the suit on any ground, Asrumati Debi v. Rupendra Deb Raikot, AIR 1953 SC 198: (1953) SCR 1159. An order of committal which terminates the pro-ceeding so far as the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free