Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Workmen - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 08 1993

Workmen Vs. Rohtas Industries Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-08-1993

Reported in: JT1995(7)SC629; 1995Supp(1)SCC171

asbestos and vulcanised fibres at Dalmianagar, District Rohtas, in the State of Bihar. It was employing about 10,000 workmen when it closed its operations in July, 1984. The said closure led to the filing of this writ


Nov 02 1993

Workmen Vs. I.i.T.i. Cycles of India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-02-1993

Reported in: (1995)IILLJ688bSC; 1995Supp(2)SCC733

of the unions for making the reference on the ground that they commanded membership of minority of the workmen. We do not read the said order as such. Lastly, we also find that after the 1978 settlement,


Feb 22 1994

Workmen Vs. J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-22-1994

Reported in: (1996)IILLJ689SC; 1995Supp(4)SCC58

the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, as amended, with effect from September 25, 1975. An agreement between the workmen and employers came about on August 26, 1975, earlier in point of time when the Act was amended.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 25 1973

Workmen Vs. Management of Sijua (Jherriah) Electric Supply Co Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-25-1973

Reported in: AIR1973SC2766; 1975(0)BLJR135; 1973LabIC1621; (1973)IILLJ488SC; (1974)3SCC473; [1974]1SCR760; 1973(5)LC892(SC)

under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (hereinafter termed 'the Bonus Act'), a sum of Rs. 34,492/-. The workmen (Appellants) refused to accept this amount as the management had failed to furnish the details or the basis


Dec 07 1981

Workmen Vs. Williamson Magor and Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-07-1981

Reported in: AIR1982SC78; (1982)ILLJ33SC; 1981(3)SCALE1825; (1982)1SCC117; [1982]2SCR42; 1982(1)SLJ163(SC); 1982(14)LC79(SC)

Baharul Islam, J.1. These two connected appeals by special leave are on behalf of Workmen of M/s. Williamson Magor & Co. Ltd. (renamed as M/s. Macneill & Magor Ltd.) represented by Williamson Magor


May 04 1973

Workmen Vs. Management of Dunlop Rubber Company of India Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-04-1973

Reported in: AIR1973SC2394; [1973(27)FLR37]; (1973)IILLJ321SC; (1973)2SCC492; [1974]1SCR228

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, by the workmen is against the award dated October 20, 1967, of the Industrial Tribual, Madras, in I.D. No. 65 of


Oct 29 1979

Workmen Vs. Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd., Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-29-1979

Reported in: 1980Supp(1)SCC683; 1980(12)LC94(SC)

Krishna Iyer, J.1. We have heard Counsel on the narrow point of dispute between the management and the workmen on the question of additional D.A. which was the subject matter of this appeal. We have taken due


Sep 26 1995

Workmen Vs. Management of India Forge and Drop Stampings Ltd., and ors

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-26-1995

Reported in: [1996(74)FLR2052]

in I.D. No. 23 of 1984. 3. Writ Petition No. 2366 of 1990 has been filed by, the workmen represented by the secretary, India Forge and Drop Stampings Employees' Union (hereinafter referred as 'the union') seeking for


Apr 18 1973

Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Workmen

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-18-1973

Reported in: AIR1973SC2292; [1973(27)FLR1]; 1973LabIC1035; (1973)IILLJ136SC; (1974)3SCC57; [1973]3SCR994

considerable expense, are contrary to the evidence adduced in the case and even the claim made by the workmen.4. Mr. Sen Gupta, learned Counsel for the workmen, pointed out that the unions had placed materials before the


Jan 31 1978

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. Vs. Workmen and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-31-1978

Reported in: AIR1978SC977; [1978(36)FLR219]; 1978LabIC707; (1978)ILLJ482SC; (1978)2SCC45; 1978(10)LC143(SC)

whether the said agent in management did commit the offending act of illegal termination of services of the workmen. There is enough material on record to show that while there was a receiver in office during the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial