Workmen - Judgment Search Results

Workmen Vs. Rohtas Industries Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(7)SC629; 1995Supp(1)SCC171

asbestos and vulcanised fibres at Dalmianagar, District Rohtas, in the State of Bihar. It was employing about 10,000 workmen when it closed its operations in July, 1984. The said closure led to the filing of this writ

Workmen Vs. I.i.T.i. Cycles of India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1995)IILLJ688bSC; 1995Supp(2)SCC733

of the unions for making the reference on the ground that they commanded membership of minority of the workmen. We do not read the said order as such. Lastly, we also find that after the 1978 settlement,

Workmen Vs. J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1996)IILLJ689SC; 1995Supp(4)SCC58

the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, as amended, with effect from September 25, 1975. An agreement between the workmen and employers came about on August 26, 1975, earlier in point of time when the Act was amended.

Workmen Vs. Management of Sijua (Jherriah) Electric Supply Co Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2766; 1975(0)BLJR135; 1973LabIC1621; (1973)IILLJ488SC; (1974)3SCC473; [1974]1SCR760; 1973(5)LC892(SC)

under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (hereinafter termed 'the Bonus Act'), a sum of Rs. 34,492/-. The workmen (Appellants) refused to accept this amount as the management had failed to furnish the details or the basis

Workmen Vs. Williamson Magor and Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC78; (1982)ILLJ33SC; 1981(3)SCALE1825; (1982)1SCC117; [1982]2SCR42; 1982(1)SLJ163(SC); 1982(14)LC79(SC)

Baharul Islam, J.1. These two connected appeals by special leave are on behalf of Workmen of M/s. Williamson Magor & Co. Ltd. (renamed as M/s. Macneill & Magor Ltd.) represented by Williamson Magor

Workmen Vs. Management of Dunlop Rubber Company of India Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2394; [1973(27)FLR37]; (1973)IILLJ321SC; (1973)2SCC492; [1974]1SCR228

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, by the workmen is against the award dated October 20, 1967, of the Industrial Tribual, Madras, in I.D. No. 65 of

Workmen Vs. Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd., Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1980Supp(1)SCC683; 1980(12)LC94(SC)

Krishna Iyer, J.1. We have heard Counsel on the narrow point of dispute between the management and the workmen on the question of additional D.A. which was the subject matter of this appeal. We have taken due

Workmen of vs Official Liquidator

Court: Karnataka

K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2021 BETWEEN:1. WORKMEN OFM/S MADANAPALLE SPINNING MILLS LTD., (A REGISTERED TRADE UNION) REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, NO.68, KESHAVAYANA GERINTA, 2ND STREET,

Workmen Vs. Management of India Forge and Drop Stampings Ltd., and ors

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1996(74)FLR2052]

in I.D. No. 23 of 1984. 3. Writ Petition No. 2366 of 1990 has been filed by, the workmen represented by the secretary, India Forge and Drop Stampings Employees' Union (hereinafter referred as 'the union') seeking for

Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Workmen

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2292; [1973(27)FLR1]; 1973LabIC1035; (1973)IILLJ136SC; (1974)3SCC57; [1973]3SCR994

considerable expense, are contrary to the evidence adduced in the case and even the claim made by the workmen.4. Mr. Sen Gupta, learned Counsel for the workmen, pointed out that the unions had placed materials before the