Workmen of vs Official Liquidator

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Aug 20, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1734209

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1734209
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: D K Singh,Venkatesh Naik T
Decided On: Aug 20, 2025
Case Number: OSA/6/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Workmen of

Respondent

Official Liquidator

Excerpt

.....official liquidator, by vasantha attached to the kumary b k location: high high court of karnataka court of m/s madanapalle spinning mills ltd karnataka (in liquidation) no.26-27, corporate bhavan, 12th floor, reheja towers, m.g. road, bengaluru-560 001.2. m/s maximus arc limited,having its office at no.59a-18/1-5a, 3rd floor, sri. plaza, teachers colony, patamata, -2- vijayawada-520 008. represented by its asst. vice president …respondents (by sri. k.s.mahadevan, advocate for r-1; sri. supreeth.s., advocate for r-2 (vc)) this o.s.a. is filed under section 483 ofcompanies act 1956 read with rules 6 & 9 of the companies (court) rules, praying this hon'ble court to set aside the order dated 25.02.2021 passed in company application no.199 of 2019 connected with c.a.no.260 of 2019 in company petition no.199/2010, by allowing the above appeal and granting the prayers made in c.a. 199/2019 & etc.this appeal, coming on for admission, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice d k singh andhon'ble mr. justice venkatesh naik toral judgment(per: hon'ble mr. justice d k singh)1. the learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo to withdraw the original side appeal no.6/2021.2. the learned counsels representing respondent nos.1 and 2 submit that, they don't have any objection in allowing the appellant to withdraw the appeal. -3-3. considering the aforesaid stand of the respondentsand having perused the memo, we dismiss this original side appeal as withdrawn. accordingly, the original side appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (d k singh) (venkatesh naik t) dha list no.: 1 sl no.: 35

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2021 BETWEEN:
1. WORKMEN OF
M/S MADANAPALLE SPINNING MILLS LTD., (A REGISTERED TRADE UNION) REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, NO.68, KESHAVAYANA GERINTA, 2ND STREET, TIRUPATHI, ANDRA PRADESH. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NARAYANA BHAT M., ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed
1. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, by VASANTHA ATTACHED TO THE KUMARY B K Location: HIGH HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA COURT OF M/s MADANAPALLE SPINNING MILLS LTD KARNATAKA (IN LIQUIDATION) No.26-27, CORPORATE BHAVAN, 12TH FLOOR, REHEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2. M/s MAXIMUS ARC LIMITED,

HAVING ITS OFFICE AT No.59A-18/1-5A, 3RD FLOOR, SRI. PLAZA, TEACHERS COLONY, PATAMATA, -2- VIJAYAWADA-520 008. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASST. VICE PRESIDENT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.S.MAHADEVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI. SUPREETH.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 (VC)) THIS O.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF

COMPANIES ACT 1956 READ WITH RULES 6 & 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.02.2021 PASSED IN COMPANY APPLICATION No.199 OF 2019 CONNECTED WITH C.A.No.260 OF 2019 IN COMPANY PETITION No.199/2010, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE APPEAL AND GRANTING THE PRAYERS MADE IN C.A. 199/2019 & ETC.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

1. The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo to withdraw the Original Side Appeal No.6/2021.

2. The learned counsels representing respondent Nos.1 and 2 submit that, they don't have any objection in allowing the appellant to withdraw the appeal. -3-

3. Considering the aforesaid stand of the respondents

and having perused the memo, we dismiss this Original Side Appeal as withdrawn. Accordingly, the Original Side Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (D K SINGH) (VENKATESH NAIK T) DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2025 Same Parties Workmen of vs Official Liquidator Same Judge D K Singh,Venkatesh Naik T