Treating - Judgment Search Results
Treat Vs. Grand Canyon Ry. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-09-1912
Treat v. Grand Canyon Ry. Co. - 222 U.S. 448 (1912)
Andersen Vs. Treat
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-14-1898
for whether this application was tested on the petition alone, treating the record as part thereof, or heard without objection, as
Treat Vs. White
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-29-1901
Treat v. White - 181 U.S. 264 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court
Tinsley Vs. Treat
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-1907
Tinsley v. Treat - 205 U.S. 20 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Tinsley v.
Kessler Vs. Treat
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-1907
KESSLER v. TREAT - 205 U.S. 33 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court KESSLER v.
Treat Vs. Jemison
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1874
Treat v. Jemison - 87 U.S. 652 (1874) U.S. Supreme Court
Jamshedpur Metal Treat Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Aug-24-2001
1. The issue involved in the present appeal is as regards the admissibility of modvat credit in respect of conveyor...
Treat Mfg. Co. Vs. Standard Steel and Iron Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-08-1895
Treat Mfg. Co. v. Standard Steel & Iron Co. - 157
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Assam Timber Treating Works and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-19-1997
Reported in: 1998(100)ELT7(SC); (1998)8SCC718
ORDER1. Leave granted. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. It is not disputed that a three-Judge Bench in...
Collr. of Central Excise Vs. Assam Timber Treating Works
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-1995
Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT443TriDel
1. The respondent manufactured urea formaldehyde for captive consumption in the manufacture of plywood. Since the product was liable to...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »