Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kessler Vs. Treat

Kessler vs Treat

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-04-1907
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90323

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
205 U.S. 33
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kessler

Respondent

Treat

Excerpt

kessler v. treat - 205 u.s. 33 (1907) u.s. supreme court kessler v. treat, 205 u.s. 33 (1907) 205 u.s. 33 william de. c. kessler v. morgan treat, united states marshal, el al. samuel t. morgan v. morgan treat, etc. austin b. carpenter v. morgan treat, etc. fortesque whittle v. morgan treat, etc. frank e. wilcox v. morgan treat, etc. george braden v. morgan treat, etc. frank s. royster v. morgan treat, etc. j. rice smith v. morgan treat, etc. charles f. burroughs v. morgan treat, etc. charles h. mc dowell v. morgan treat, etc. nos. 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379. argued december 3, 4, 1906. decided march 4, 1907. messrs. john s. miller, john j. vertrees, henry a. m. smith, and james c. bradford for appellants. mr. james p. helm for appellant in no. 375. assistant attorney general mcreynolds and solicitor general hoyt for appellees. page 205 u.s. 33, 34 mr. chief justice fuller: the same decrees will be entered in each of these cases as in the foregoing. mr. justice harlan dissented. mr. justice moody took no part.

Full Judgment

KESSLER v. TREAT - 205 U.S. 33 (1907)
U.S. Supreme Court KESSLER v. TREAT, 205 U.S. 33 (1907)

205 U.S. 33

WILLIAM De. C. KESSLER v. MORGAN TREAT, United States Marshal, el al.

SAMUEL T. MORGAN v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

AUSTIN B. CARPENTER v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

FORTESQUE WHITTLE v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

FRANK E. WILCOX v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

GEORGE BRADEN v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

FRANK S. ROYSTER v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

J. RICE SMITH v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

CHARLES F. BURROUGHS v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

CHARLES H. Mc DOWELL v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.

Nos. 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379.
Argued December 3, 4, 1906.
Decided March 4, 1907.

Messrs. John S. Miller, John J. Vertrees, Henry A. M. Smith, and James C. Bradford for appellants. Mr. James P. Helm for appellant in No. 375. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds and Solicitor General Hoyt for appellees.

Page 205 U.S. 33, 34

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:

The same decrees will be entered in each of these cases as in the foregoing.

Mr. Justice Harlan dissented.

Mr. Justice Moody took no part.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial