Testify - Judgment Search Results

Maheshwari International Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1993)(67)ELT829TriDel

1 these two appeals are disposed of by a common order as the issue involved is common 2 the appellants...

M. Sunderamoorthy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Through Inspector of Police

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1269; 1990CriLJ1309; 1990(2)Crimes456(SC); JT1990(2)SC46; 1990(1)SCALE677; (1990)3SCC257; [1990]2SCR335

..... scooter claimants plea that deceased was pillion rider while respondent was driving it eye witness testifying to same effect respondent taking different stands at different stages did not come forward to .....

Mrs. Malati Ramchandra Raut and Others Vs. Mahadevo Vasudeo Joshi and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC700; (1991)93BOMLR419; JT1991(1)SC19; 1991(1)MhLj605; 1990(2)SCALE1366; 1991Supp(1)SCC321; [1990]Supp3SCR577; 1991(1)LC492(SC)

..... on fire declaration found to be truthful son of deceased a child eye witness also testifying that accused was author of crime held accused is liable to be convicted in view .....

All India Railway Institute Employees' Association through the General ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC952; JT1990(1)SC319; (1991)IILLJ265SC; 1990(1)SCALE295; (1990)2SCC542; [1990]1SCR594

..... on fire declaration found to be truthful son of deceased a child eye witness also testifying that accused was author of crime held accused is liable to be convicted in view .....

Ramaiah Setty Vs. Meena

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1991ACJ300; ILR1991KAR937; 1990(2)KarLJ281

..... overcome only by offering the maker of the survey report come before the court and testify with regard to the accuracy of the report no such opportunity was available for the .....

Maryland Vs. Craig

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the other elements of the confrontation right the child witness must be competent to testify and must testify under oath the defendant retains full opportunity for contemporaneous cross examination and the ..... in protecting children who are allegedly victims of child abuse from the trauma of testifying against the alleged perpetrator and that its statutory procedure for receiving testimony from such .....

Puttu Singh Alias Thakur and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000CriLJ537

..... the recovery from the accused appellants as aforesaid he has also testified to the preparation of the recovery memo the sealing of ..... went to their respective houses and brought their weapons he has testified that he brought his rifle ram das verma intended victim ..... their assembly and preparation 22 all the three prosecution witnesses had testified to the retorts imputed to the dacoits in the recovery .....

James Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... impeachment through contradictory evidence moreover defendants often cannot trust even friendly witnesses to testify without subjecting themselves to impeachment simply due to insufficient care or attentiveness this ..... concern is magnified in those occasional situations when defendants must call witnesses to testify despite having had only a limited opportunity to consult with or prepare them .....

Hodgson Vs. Minnesota

Court: US Supreme Court

..... whether the statute furthered the state s interest in protecting pregnant minors only two witnesses testified that a two parent notification statute did minors more good than harm neither of these ..... has a negligible effect upon intra family communication and upon the minors decisionmaking process others testified the statute has a deleterious effect on the wellbeing of the minors to whom it .....

idaho Vs. Wright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... she had made to a pediatrician having extensive experience in child abuse cases the doctor testified that she had reluctantly answered questions about her own abuse but had spontaneously volunteered ..... presumptively unreliable on the ground that the trial court found the younger daughter incompetent to testify at trial first respondent s contention rests upon a questionable reading of the record .....