Testify - Judgment Search Results

Karamshi Jethabhai Somayya Vs. the State of Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1964SC1714; [1964]6SCR984

subba rao j 1 this appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decreeof the high court of...

C.S. Rowjee and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1964SC962; [1964]6SCR330

ayyangar j 1 this batch of 11 appeals which have been consolidated for hearing aredirected against the common judgment of...

Lakhshmi Chand Vs. the State

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1965CriLJ832

shamsher bahadur j 1 lakshmi chand appellant who is 23 years of age has appealed from his conviction under section...

Mukhtar Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1965All191; [1968(16)FLR413]

uniyal j 1 this petition for habeas corpus under section 491 cr p c has been filed by one mukhtar...

State of Bombay (Maharashtra) Vs. Shivbalak Gourishanker Dube and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC661; 1965MhLJ675(SC); [1965]1SCR211

..... scooter claimants plea that deceased was pillion rider while respondent was driving it eye witness testifying to same effect respondent taking different stands at different stages did not come forward to .....

Chhabildas Tribhuvandas Shah and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1966]59ITR733(SC)

..... on fire declaration found to be truthful son of deceased a child eye witness also testifying that accused was author of crime held accused is liable to be convicted in view .....

United States Vs. Welden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the sherman act and conspiracy act concerned matters about which he had previously testified before a congressional subcommittee the district court dismissed the indictment upholding appellee ..... the relevant congressional enactments congress has extended immunity with careful safeguards to persons testifying before congressional committees in certain limited situations not here involved footnote 18 .....

Ungar Vs. Sarafite

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court to appoint a doctor to determine whether ungar was malingering or incapable of testifying upon resumption ungar represented that page 376 u s 581 he obtained his own medical ..... one man grand jury investigating crime could not convict for contempt witnesses who he believed testified falsely or inadequately before him in secret grand jury proceedings and is not controlling here .....

Bell Vs. Maryland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... instant case g carroll hooper president of the corporate chain owning the restaurant here involved testified concerning the episode that gave rise to these convictions the reasons were wholly commercial ..... case g carroll hooper president of the corporate chain owning the restaurant here involved testified concerning the episode that gave rise to these convictions his reasons were wholly commercial .....

Murphy Vs. Waterfront Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... convict him of a crime against another such jurisdiction footnote 1 petitioners were subpoenaed to testify at a hearing conducted by the waterfront commission of new york harbor concerning a work ..... fifth amendment inapplicable to the states footnote 14 in adams v maryland supra petitioner had testified before a united states senate committee investigating crime and his testimony had later been used .....