Testify - Judgment Search Results

Virbhan Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1983SC1002; 1983(2)Crimes376(SC); 1983(2)SCALE91; (1983)4SCC197; [1983]3SCR600

..... on fire declaration found to be truthful son of deceased a child eye witness also testifying that accused was author of crime held accused is liable to be convicted in view .....

Management of Metal Box of India Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Additiona ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1983)IILLJ273SC; 1983(1)SCALE703a; 1984Supp(1)SCC649

..... scooter claimants plea that deceased was pillion rider while respondent was driving it eye witness testifying to same effect respondent taking different stands at different stages did not come forward to .....

Pillsbury Co. Vs. Conboy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is whether respondent is barred from asserting the fifth amendment privilege because he previously testified under a statutory grant of immunity and because his answers to the deposition questions ..... advantages over former transactional immunity statutes in that they provide no gratuity to a testifying witness they encourage the giving of more complete testimony by proscribing the use of .....

United States Vs. Hasting

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on the possibility that the victims identification of respondents was mistaken none of the respondents testified during the prosecutor s summation to the jury defense counsel objected when the prosecutor began ..... the fifth amendment guarantee against self incrimination to mean that comment on the failure to testify was an unconstitutional burden on the basic right accordingly the court held that the .....

Briscoe Vs. Lahue

Court: US Supreme Court

..... damages liability based on their testimony and rejected the petitioners contention that government officials who testify about the performance of their official duties may be held liable under 1983 even ..... self censorship apply with diminished force to police officers policemen often have a duty to testify about the products of their investigations and they have a professional interest in obtaining .....

Rushen Vs. Spain

Court: US Supreme Court

..... her association with the santa monica crime and she repeatedly testified that upon page 464 u s 121 recollection the incident ..... the defense called as a witness one louis tackwood who testified that various law enforcement officers had plotted to encourage jackson ..... trial where all appellants and their counsel were present she testified that she associated the black panther party with worthwhile .....

Barefoot Vs. Estelle

Court: US Supreme Court

..... two psychiatrists john holbrook and james grigson who in response to hypothetical questions testified that petitioner would probably commit further acts of violence and represent a continuing ..... factfinders themselves are constitutionally competent to decide footnote 7 at trial dr holbrook testified without contradiction that a psychiatrist could predict the future dangerousness of an individual .....

Brij Raj Singh and anr. Vs. the State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1983CriLJ1916

..... occurrence took place on the road near village bhadwas it was testified by ram swaroop that the assailants had more ill will ..... flour machine mahendra prempal and chhokey witnessed the occurrence he further testified about the winning over of suresh and chokey by the appellants ..... sri s k gupta p w 4 who recorded the declaration testified that there was none near the declarant when this declaration was .....

United States Vs. Sells Engineering, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and detailed statutes rules or regulations conferring only limited authority to require citizens to testify or produce evidence some agencies have been granted special statutory powers to obtain ..... address that aspect of the problem directly was acting deputy attorney general richard thornburgh testifying on behalf of the justice department at the house hearings thornburgh acknowledged that .....

United States Vs. Rylander

Court: US Supreme Court

..... respondent rylander respondent to appear before an irs agent and to produce for examination and testify with respect to records of two corporations of which respondent was president when respondent failed ..... s contention based on those cases that the custodian had no privilege to refuse to testify about such records on grounds that testimony might incriminate him in reversing the contempt conviction .....