Testify - Judgment Search Results

Canara Bank Vs. Canara Sales Corporation and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1603; [1987]62CompCas280(SC); JT1987(2)SC491; 1987(1)SCALE924; (1987)2SCC666; [1987]2SCR1138

..... s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj conspiracy to murder proof witness a taxi driver testifying to have overheard plan hatched by accused at dhaba however his evidence showing that he .....

S.A. Jais and Co. and ors. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC254; (1988)1GLR337(SC); JT1987(4)SC384; 1987(2)SCALE1063; 1987Supp(1)SCC614

..... on fire declaration found to be truthful son of deceased a child eye witness also testifying that accused was author of crime held accused is liable to be convicted in view .....

Mahesh S/O Ram NaraIn and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1346; 1987CriLJ1073; JT1987(1)SC793; 1987(1)SCALE594; (1987)3SCC80; [1987]2SCR710; 1987(2)LC150(SC)

..... scooter claimants plea that deceased was pillion rider while respondent was driving it eye witness testifying to same effect respondent taking different stands at different stages did not come forward to .....

Kentucky Vs. Stincer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 524 see generally 2 wigmore 505 507 footnote 12 some states explicitly allow children to testify without requiring a prior competency qualification while others simply provide that all persons including ..... taken place had the trial court determined that the children were not competent to testify although this court recognizes the problems and pressures encountered when dealing with child witnesses .....

Rock Vs. Arkansas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ruling that the limitations on her testimony did not violate her constitutional right to testify and that criminal defendants hypnotically refreshed testimony is inadmissible per se because it is ..... excluding all hypnotically refreshed testimony infringes impermissibly on a criminal defendant s right to testify on his or her own behalf despite any unreliability that hypnosis may introduce into .....

Tanner Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... petitioners argument that substance abuse constitutes an improper outside influence about which jurors may testify under the rule is without merit in light of contrary judicial interpretation of the ..... indictment or concerning his mental processes in connection therewith except that a juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury s .....

Ricketts Vs. Adamson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sought respondent s further cooperation but was informed that respondent believed his obligation to testify under the agreement terminated when he was sentenced after the trial court refused to ..... concluded that whatever doubt was created by paragraph 8 regarding respondent s obligation to testify after sentencing the colloquy at the sentencing hearing evinced a clear understanding that respondent .....

Town of Newton Vs. Rumery

Court: US Supreme Court

..... had gone through enough app 52 thus mary deary s emotional distress her unwillingness to testify against rumery presumably in later civil as well as criminal proceedings and the necessity of ..... course reasonable to assume that deary s emotional distress may have affected her unwillingness to testify against either champy or rumery and thereby influenced the prosecutor s decision to dismiss the .....

Burger Vs. Kemp

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that lawyer establishing that he would have offered substantial mitigating evidence if he had testified accordingly while leaphart s judgment may have been erroneous the record surely does not ..... defense counsel from exploring possible plea negotiations and the possibility of an agreement to testify for the prosecution provided a lesser charge or a favorable sentencing recommendation would be .....

Turner Vs. Safley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at trial the missouri correspondence provision was promulgated primarily for security reasons prison officials testified that mail between institutions can be used to communicate escape plans and to arrange ..... inmate to inmate mail kansas apparently lacks sufficient resources to ban it ms halford testified that open correspondence was not abrogated in the kansas correctional system despite security .....