Testify - Judgment Search Results

State Vs. Sunil Batra Alias Bobby

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1978Delhi536

s rangarajan j 1 this judgment in murder reference no 1of 1977 will dispose of not only cr appeals no...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. National Sound Studio (P.) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1979]117ITR422(Cal)

dipak kumar sen j 1 this reference arises out of reassessments made on national sound studio private ltd calcutta under...

The Election Commission of India Vs. N.G. Ranga and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1609; (1978)4SCC181; [1979]1SCR210; 1978(10)LC639(SC)

..... scooter claimants plea that deceased was pillion rider while respondent was driving it eye witness testifying to same effect respondent taking different stands at different stages did not come forward to .....

State of Haryana Vs. Prabhu and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1019; 1979CriLJ892; (1979)4SCC189

..... on fire declaration found to be truthful son of deceased a child eye witness also testifying that accused was author of crime held accused is liable to be convicted in view .....

United States Vs. Grayson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on further cross examination however grayson modified his description of the conversation captain kurd testified that grayson had never mentioned in any fashion threats from other inmates finally the ..... argument that the sentencing practice challenged here will inhibit exercise of the right to testify truthfully is entirely frivolous that argument misapprehends the nature and scope of the practice .....

United States Vs. Ceccolini

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the typical documentary evidence is that such exclusion would perpetually disable a witness from testifying about relevant and material facts regardless of how unrelated such testimony might be ..... originally illegal search or the evidence discovered thereby rules which disqualify knowledgeable witnesses from testifying at trial are in the words of professor mccormick serious obstructions to the .....

Lakeside Vs. Oregon

Court: US Supreme Court

..... any adverse inference from the defendant s decision not to testify in his behalf does not violate the privilege against compulsory ..... 609 the court stated that comment on the refusal to testify violates the constitutional privilege the court was there concerned ..... argues the court said that comment on the refusal to testify violates the constitutional privilege against compulsory self incrimination 380 .....

Holloway Vs. Arkansas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... information created conflicting loyalties because none of the petitioners had incriminated codefendants while testifying the court concluded that the record demonstrated no actual conflict of interests or ..... campbell from exploring possible plea negotiations and the possibility of an agreement to testify for the prosecution provided a lesser charge or a favorable sentencing recommendation would .....

Agosto Vs. Ins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... angela could not care for petitioner in ohio the pianettis testified that petitioner was never in the foundling home but that ..... his father to be one charles litizia in addition the pianettis testified to the varied relationships mrs pianetti s sister angela porello ..... f 2d 971 ca7 1967 the petitioner and three supporting witnesses testified that the petitioner s father said he had been naturalized .....

Nlrb Vs. Robbins Tire and Rubber Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... protect existing nlrb policy forbidding disclosure of statements of prospective witnesses until after they had testified at unfair labor practice hearings in its view the 1974 amendments preserved congress original ..... to give statements to nlrb investigators at all absent assurances that unless called to testify in a hearing their statements will be exempt from disclosure until the unfair labor .....