Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: stolen goods Page 9 of about 8,727 results (0.012 seconds)

Harris Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... course, that certain objects, the possession of which is in some way illegal, may be seized on appropriate occasions without a search warrant. such objects include stolen goods, property forfeited to the government, property concealed to avoid payment of duties, counterfeit coins, burglar tools, gambling paraphernalia, illicit liquor and the like. boyd v ..... arrest has never been authorized by congress. nor has congress ever authorized such search without a warrant even for stolen or contraband goods. on the contrary, it is precisely for the search of such goods page 331 u. s. 163 that specific legislative authorization was given by congress. warrants even for such search ..... the district court acted on the assumption that the agents conducted their search in good faith for the purpose of discovering the objects specified. that determination is supported by the record. the two canceled checks were stolen from the offices of the mudge oil company. there was evidence connecting petitioner with .....

Rugendorf Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to challenge the sufficiency of the affidavit as a basis of the search warrant, but also for use on the issue of guilt or innocence -- viz., knowing possession of stolen goods. the issue was considered by the court of appeals, * 316 f.2d 589, 592; and we should do the same. petitioner and his wife were in florida on ..... closet opening off a regularly used recreation room. in the same closet was mrs. rugendorf's fur piece. leo rugendorf, petitioner's brother, was a known receiver of stolen goods, and was seen at the home while the rugendorfs were in florida. petitioner testified at trial that leo had borrowed a key before petitioner went to florida, and that ..... the seized furs was denied by the trial court. held: 1. the search warrant was valid as long as it provided a substantial basis to support the conclusion that the stolen goods were probably in petitioner's basement. pp. 376 u. s. 531 -533. (a) factual inaccuracies, not going to the integrity of the affidavit, do not destroy probable .....

Badal Samser Ali Vs. State

Court : Guwahati

..... with illustration (a) explained to the jury. it is a rule of evidence that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft, is either a thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen unless he can account for his possession. in this case if you believe that the articles recovered from the house of badal ..... the court or the jury to presume when the recovery of the property was made soon after the theft that he was either a thief or had received goods knowing them to be stolen unless he could account for his possession. the presumption is one of fact and whether the court or the jury ought to draw it or not must ..... in his possession and control either exclusively or with the connivance of his father.there was no evidence in the case that badal received the goods knowing or having reason to believe that they were stolen or was there any evidence to show that he received property recovered from his house dishonestly. articles were recovered from the house where he and .....

In Re: Shivanna and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant17; AIR1955Mys17; 1955CriLJ360

..... in their relation to the facts of the particular case. the presumption that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft, is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen is not what is stated hi the section itself but is found as an illustration to it. this is an illustration ..... and even implored the other not to hurt or kill the deceased. the argument based on the failure of the appellants to satisfactorily explain away their recent possession of stolen articles to buttress the submission that the appellants are guilty of murder is, as already stated, not strictly warranted by the words appearing in section 114, evidence act ..... to show how presumption under section 114 could be drawn. no doubt possession of stolen articles soon after theft raises a presumption that the .....

Satya NaraIn and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1953All385

..... illustration as it purports to be; it does not lay down the entire law on the subject and it is needless to emphasise that it uses the words, ''stolen goods'', ' theft'' and '' thief'. there is no force in the argument that because the words 'dacoity' and 'dacoit' are not used in it, a person who ..... respect to the learned judge i do not agree. section 412, penal code, refers to property carried away by dacoits as stolen property. even otherwise the words used in the illustration are not 'stolen pro. perty', but 'stolen goods'. 'stolen property' may have a particular meaning as given in section 410, penal code., but there is nothing to suggest thatthe ..... (a) of section 114, evidence act. this illustration has the words :'that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession.'14. the learned counsel for the state, relying on this illustration, argued that .....

Kunwarlal and Etc. Vs. State of M.P. and Etc.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3632

..... for the deceased who did not return. but, the appellant did not lodge any report and did not inform anybody. there was no explanation of his possession of stolen goods of the deceased. a big bloodstained knife of which the origin the blood was not known was recovered from him. in these circumstances, the apex court held that ..... those are important circumstances.25. in 1978' s case of chhote lal singh 1978 cri lj 1411 (sc) (supra) the detail facts are not mentioned. the articles stolen in the dacoity were recovered from the accused and there was no other evidence nor any other peculiar circumstances about the recovery. the apex court said that in these circumstances ..... recovered from the accused and further that mere possession of the looted ornaments does not lead to inference of dacoity and the proper inference at worst should be of receiving stolen property. for this counsel cited some pronouncement of the supreme court : chhotelal singh v. state of m.p. air 1978 sc 1390 : 1978 cri lj 1411, .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Manga and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1075

..... circumstances to which reference has been made above, raises a strong presumption that the accused were the murderers.7. as regards the presumption to be drawn from possession of stolen goods in such a case, reference may usefully be made to three decisions of their lordships of the supreme court: sanwat khan v. state of raiaslhan : air1956sc54 , ..... days after the occurrence.1. that the appellant took part in the dacoity;2. that he received stolen goods knowing that the goods were stolen in the commission of the dacoity;3. that the appellant received these goods knowing them to have been stolen. however, on the facts of the case, their lordships observed that the only legitimate presumption to ..... be drawn is that the appellant, knew that the goods were stolen and, therefore, the appellant was convicted under section 411, indian penal code.11. the discussion on the subject will not be complete unless we .....

ishan Muchi and ors. Vs. the Queen-empress

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1888)ILR15Cal511

..... established; and this is consistent with only one offence having been committed, so far as receiving is concerned; but in truth the offence proved is only the retaining of stolen goods.9. in this case, as observed, there is no proof of actual receiving ; and it has been held in england 2 russell on crimes citing b. v. ..... and we see no reason why it should not), the prisoners should have been convicted of the retention of stolen goods, knowing or having reason to believe that they were stolen, of the existence of which knowledge or belief their concealment of the goods was evidence.11. we, therefore, set aside the conviction in the second trial. the conviction in the ..... to another.2. they were separately tried and sentenced on each of these charges.3. there is no proof against them save the fact that the goods found in their possession were stolen from different persons, and were found in their possession under such circumstances as to prove a guilty knowledge on their part.4. there is no .....

ind Swift Limited Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

..... , by using the words such as? it is clear that only tablets, vials, syrups etc. are covered. further, the appellant itself had described the stolen goods as raw materials vide its letter dated 23.04.2004. a plea, therefore, cannot now be taken that these were standalone medicines and not unfinished ..... the consumer protection act, 1986. further, on merits as well, the state commission concluded that from the details of the stolen goods as communicated by the appellant itself, it is clear that these were not finished goods but raw materials i.e. salts which cannot be termed as medicines, capsules, vials etc. as per the details mentioned in ..... that the state commission erred by misinterpreting the provisions of the insurance policy as also in concluding that the stolen goods were not medicines but raw materials. it was contended that the insurance policy, specifically states that the goods insured included stocks of all kinds of medicines and reads as follows: on stocks of all kinds of .....

Shaukat and Another Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... recovery of the articles had been made, had received them or procured them. in other cases, it can be inferred that the accused had knowledge that the goods were stolen goods. yet, in other cases, an inference may be made that the accused, who had produced the article, is guilty of murder as well. the supreme ..... facts which must be taken into account for the purpose of probative and evidentiary value, with reference being again made to the nature and character of the stolen goods; whether they are easily available and routinely dealt with, can be planted as evidence, frequently change hands, and the time gap existing between the occurrence and ..... facts of the particular case. illustrations the court may presume (a) that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession; ? 15. section 114 also highlights exceptional situations corresponding to each illustration, .....