Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: stolen goods Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 42 results (0.059 seconds)

Anil Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR1974

..... by the petitioner of which the total amount has not been returned. the respondents in their counter affidavit have also given the chart of the confiscated and stolen goods and the goods, which were damaged at paragraph no. 19 of the said affidavit.12. in the aforesaid background, the respondents, being liable to return the ..... before the secretary, food & civil supplies. government of bihar, patna, who dismissed the appeal on 5th january, 1999.6. in the meantime, some of the seized goods of petitioner were stolen away for which the respondents lodged first information report, registered as barhi p.s. case no. 91 of 1998, under sections 461/379/406 of the indian penal ..... and extends to any failure on the part of the government. for instance, the goods might have been sold in pursuance of interim arrangement under section 6-a(2), or it might have been lost or stolen from the place of storage. the goods might have been deteriorated or rusted in quality or quantity. the liability to return the .....

Ved Prakash VermA. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... aforesaid crime. 3. it is further submitted that grp , gomoh has no jurisdiction to lodge this case because under the railway property (unlawful possession) act 1966 , if any goods stolen from goods train during transit , only rpf has jurisdiction to lodge case. 4. it is further submitted that in fact petitioner of aba no. 48 of 2011 has been implicated in this ..... sri. r.s. singh, learned additional p.ps for the state.2. it is alleged that in connivance with petitioner of aba no. 48 of 2011, petitioner of another case stolen coal from railway wagons. it is submitted that there is no evidence to show that these petitioners unloaded coal from the railway wagons and/or connived with others for committing .....

Anil Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR240(Jhr)]

..... paid to him for the reasons stated in paragraph 16 of the order namely, on the ground that the case of the state government was that those seized goods were stolen away by the licensee and/or his relation and for which a criminal case was pending against them and hence he is not entitled to any amount of interest ..... to the writ petitioner with 8% interest was altered by holding that he would be entitled to get the price of seized goods, which were stolen away, on the rate, the goods other than those articles, which were stolen away, were sold in the year 1998 subject to the final decision of the deputy commissioner regarding the rate as per the ..... disposed of the said writ application with the following order which is quoted herein-below :'in the aforesaid background, the respondents, being liable to return the goods seized, if any of it stood stolen away from the place of storage, are bound to refund the amount to be calculated at the market rate. accordingly, they are directed to make it .....

New India Assurance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Shyam Sunder Hetamsariya ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR50(Jhr)]

..... the quantity of stock which existed within the plaintiffs' premises prior to the date of burglary and stock which remained after the burglary and the value of stock of goods stolen away resulting in the loss sustained by the plaintiffs. the learned trial court has rightly accepted the evidence adduced on this issue by the plaintiffs. the defendants have not ..... police station on 29.12.1984. the extent of value of the goods stolen away was assessed at rs. 5,54,898/-. the plaintiffs put up their claim with the defendants to reimburse the loss to the extent of the amount assessed. in ..... the shop of the plaintiffs. the burglars by use of violence had broken open the lock of the iron shutters and after entering into the shop, had stolen away the cloths and goods from within the shop of the plaintiffs' shop. the theft was detected on the next morning and the first information report (fir) was lodged at the .....

Parvati Devi and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... the evidence act is relevant. it lays down that a court may presume that a man who is in the possession of goods soon after the theft , is either the thief, or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for its possession. the determination of the period which can come within the term' soon before' ..... has submitted that both d.w1and d.w2have said that the relations between deceased manti devi and her father- in-law and mother-in-law including her husband was good. both have deposed that the deceased died due to diarrhoea and that she was treated by one dr. kalyan chatterjee of hazaribagh. both have deposed that nageshwar used to ..... deposed that he had not seen the bleeding from the ear and nose and that cremation was done together by choti and shankar. p.w13has also mentioned about the good relations between the deceased manti devi and her family(in-laws).25. the learned counsel for the appellants has also relied upon the deposition made by the defence witnesses. .....

Roshan Lakra Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... no injury report produced or any doctor examined. though, it has come on record that he got his wound treated. no pistols have been recovered. 14. no stolen or robbed goods or items have been produced. though, in the judgment of the lower court it has come that the informant had taken some items back from the police. now ..... he got his wounds treated, and recognized roshan lakra in dock and had gone to jail where he recognized deo kumar. he further deposed that he got some looted goods from the police. it has been submitted that as per the fardbeyan bleeding injury was caused but there is no injury report to substantiate the same. 5. the ..... , hatia. the informant further stated that this miscreant was serving as driver of his maruti van about 6 months ago. thereafter, 5 or 6 miscreants started collecting house hold goods, opening the godrej almira by its key and searching jewellary and golden watch. they also damaged t.v. boxes and other materials and looted cash money, cloths, jewellary, .....

Ashok Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... , when the goods did not reach the said destination, the informant suspecting the goods along with the trucks being stolen lodged the f.i.r.3. it appears from the ordersheet of the court below enclosed with this writ application as annexure-2 ..... was instituted with the allegation that being the owner of nalanda roadways, jamshedpur, he hired two trucks bearing registration no. jh-05w- 8017 and cg04dg8154from muskan transport for transportation of goods from the factory of m/s. sah sponge and power limited to one m/s. balmukund construction mahadevpur, phulwari, bihta, patna on 19.11.2013 but till 29.11.2013 .....

Chhotu Ram Mahto, Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR702; [2007(1)JCR459(Jhr)]

..... the evidence act is relevant. it lays down that a court may presume that a man who is in the possession of goods 'soon after the theft', is either the thief, or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for its possession. the determination of the period which can come within the term 'soon before' is left .....

Jhaboo Mahato and Kartik Mahato Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2511

..... the evidence act is relevant. it lays down that a court may presume that a man who is in the possession of goods 'soon after the theft, is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for their possession'. the determination of the period which can come within the term 'soon before' is left .....

Pawan Kumar Laharuka @ P.K. Lahruka and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR728(Jhr)]

..... and the petitioners did not disown the said coal being carried on the truck. the main thrust of the prosecution was that though good quality of coal used to be supplied through agreement of linkage with m/s. bccl but the petitioners used to dispose it of ..... coke to be carried on the said trucks on the instance of the owner petitioners. they further admitted that though the coal were of good quality but the same were disposed of as unusable coal and the petitioners were the owners of the said company.4. mr. indrajit ..... that the property alleged to be recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners were the stolen property and the investigating agency failed to collect any material to show that the coal loaded on the trucks in question were ..... stolen property. the prosecution alleged that the petitioners were indulged in illegal mining but without disclosure of any such place .....