Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: stolen goods Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 148 results (0.158 seconds)

B. Shankar and ors. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2242

..... and tip can be proceeded with. before undertaking the same, a link has to be established with reference to the recoveries from the accused of the stolen goods. the recovered goods, in turn, have to be kept for identification by the victims. it is only on emergence of such a link that further steps can be taken ..... properties were recovered from them.36. the prosecution has conducted two sets of identification parades. one is about the identification by the respective victims of the articles stolen from them and recovered from various accused. the second one is about the identification of the various accused by the respective victims. the method of recovery, ..... of two important factors, viz., identification of the accused by the victims or other persons who have seen them committing the offence and recovery of items of stolen property from the accused. though these two are circumstantial in nature, if established during the trial to the satisfaction of the court, would certainly link the .....

S.Kumara Swamy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by the Spec

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... in that process illustration (a) of section 114 of evidence act which says that ".a man who is in the possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing that to be stolen unless he can account for his possession". can be profitably used, though that by itself may not or need not necessarily lead .....

In Re: Madugula Jermiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1957CriLJ1071

..... transferred from the deceased to the accused except by the former being murdered.this judgment also does not support the contention that in every case from the unexplained possession of stolen goods, a presumption of murder should be drawn. nor docs the judgment of beasley, c. j. and reilly, j., in kallam narayaua v. king emperor ilr 56 ..... to facts of the particular case.illustration.the court may presume(a) that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after theft, is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can ac-count for his possession. the section deals with presumptions of fact. russell in his valuable book ..... section. the earliest decision is that of queen empress v. sami ilr 13 mad 426 (d), wherein the learned judges held that recent and unexplained possession of stolen property was presumptive evidence against the prisoners on the charge of robbery as well as of murder, when the two offences constituted parts of the same transaction. the .....

Smt. Ratlavat Chandi Vs. Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, Home Dep ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT850; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)711

..... seems to have suspected that said mothya has retained the remaining stolen goods and in order to make further investigation, two police constables, namely, kurmaiah and janardhan went to the place of the petitioner's husband around 7.00 p.m. ..... the guilt to the police during the course of interrogation and also informed the police that the petitioner's husband has no nexus with the theft.6. the stolen goods found in the rickshaw being driven by the husband of the petitioner which was left by said chinna venkati was a small quantity contained in one bag. police ..... while in the custody for five days, the petitioner's husband was tortured inhumanly by the police on the ground that the said mothya had committed theft of electrical goods, though the petitioner's husband was no way connected with the theft items. on knowing that her husband was detained in the police custody in the rural police .....

In Re: Boddu Sanyasi Patrudu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1957CriLJ939

..... a person in possession of stolen goods is either the thief or receiver of stolen property, having regard to the surrounding circumstances. according to the prosecution the people behind the crime did not want to employ persons known to the members ..... section 114(a) of the evidence act says that the court may presume that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to he stolen unless he can account for his possession.it is clear from this that it is open to a court to presume that ..... in the absence of such connection, no presumption could be drawn under section 114(a) of the evidence act either that, a person is the thief or receiver of stolen articles. neither his indebtedness to that family nor his failure to go to their house alter the incident would in any way implicate him in the offence. in these circumstances .....

In Re: Shaik Server

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1957CriLJ1393

..... . but when he accounts for his possession of the stolen goods, the question which arises for consideration is whether his explanation is inherently or palpably false or such as to cast a reasonable doubt as to his guilt - ..... case the court would be required to reach that conclusion in the absence of evidence to the contrary. no doubt when a person denies altogether his possession of stolen goods not in common circulation which possession the court finds to be proved, if is normally easier to draw an adverse inference as to the person's guilty knowledge ..... the sub-magistrate.4. the main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he did not know nor have reason to believe that the goods were stolen and that both the magistrates have overlooked the fundamental principle that the onus of proving all the ingredients of the offence charged, never shifts from the prosecution, .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Anantharam Veerasingaiah and Co.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1975]99ITR544(AP)

..... 379 and 411, indian penal code, a criminal court is entitled to draw a presumption of guilt from the mere fact that a person is found in possession of stolen goods soon after the commission of the theft if that person is unable to account for his possession. the first illustration to section 114 of the evidence act provides for such ..... evidence act provides that where a person is accused of being the receiver of stolen goods knowing them to be stolen and it is proved that he was in possession of a particular stolen article the fact that at the same time he was in the possession of many other stolen goods is relevant as tending to show that he knew that each and all ..... of the articles in his possession were stolen. we may also refer to section 15 of the evidence act which provides that when the question is regarding the knowledge or intention of .....

Dammagouni Dubba Rajagoud and anr. Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Publi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)292; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)299

..... illustration (a) to section 114 of the indian evidence act the court may presume that a man, who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft, is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession. the appellants did not account for possession of m.os.1 to 26. if ..... he knows or has reason to believe to belong or to have belonged to a gang of dacoits, property which he knows or has reason to believe to have been stolen, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine.'9. the ..... presumption is drawn under illustration (a) to section 114 of the indian evidence act, the presumption is that the appellants are the thieves or receivers of the stolen property.the appellants .....

Sivagallu Sailu Vs. the State, Station House Officer, Kothur

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... their relation to the facts of the particular case. the court may presume: (a) that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession; (b) that an accomplice is unworthy of credit, unless he is corroborated in material particulars ..... ; (c) that a bill of exchange, accepted or endorsed, was accepted or endorsed for good consideration; (d) that a thing or state of things which .....

Md.Rasheed Vs. the Managing Director, Apsrtc,musheeraba

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... punished by the king by impaling him on a post. this occurred as a band of robbers hid their stolen goods in a corner of his hermitage when he had been in deep contemplation. as a result, he was wrongly assumed to have stolen the goods. resultantly, the punishment of impalement was imposed. concerning this episode in mahabharatha, in beyond orientalism, the work of .....