Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: stolen goods Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 147 results (0.041 seconds)

Pakhar Singh and ors. Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1950P& H66; 1950CriLJ581

..... with imprisonment either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.24. now, the theft and taking and retention of stolen goods form one and the same offence and cannot be punished separately. referenoe may be made to circular no. 16 from the offioia-ting registrar of the high court ..... regard to the conviction ol 'knowingly retaining btolen property. it has been frequently ruled by this court that in oases like the present the theft and the retention of the stolen goods form one and the same offence, and cannot be punished separately. again, in the case of queen v. seeb churn haree, 11 w. b, or. 12, norman ..... dishonest removal within the meaning of section 379 of the code constitutes dishonest reception within section 411 and that being bo the thief does not commit; the offence of retaining stolen property merely by continuing to keep possession of the property he stole. in najibullah khan v. emperor 18 p. e, 1884 or., plowden j. observed:to constitute .....

Date of Decision: 31.08.2013 Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the indian evidence act reads as under:- the court may presume-- (a) that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession. a division bench of this court in state v. jita ram, ilr ( ..... or by extortion, or by robbery, and property which has been criminally misappropriated or in respect of which criminal breach of trust has been committed, is designated as "stolen property", whether the transfer has been made, or the misappropriation or breach of trust has been committed, within or without. but, if such property subsequently comes into ..... as already noticed, the actual robbery was committed by three persons and involvement of more than five persons is not established. the robbery having been committed and the stolen cash recovered from the appellant, therefore, the offence under section 411 ipc is made out against him. the question that he was not charged for the said .....

Jai Parkash Sharma @ Raja Babu Vs. Versus

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of the petitioner suffered extra judicial confession, in regard to committing of theft and selling the stolen goods to the petitioner. there are direct allegations that he (petitioner) is receiving and selling the stolen goods. as the recovery of stolen articles is yet to be effected, therefore, to me, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner ..... . if he is allowed the benefit of anticipatory bail, then, the recovery of stolen goods is not possible, which would naturally adversely affect & weaken the case of the prosecution and police will be deprived from recovering the stolen articles from the accused. moreover, the order of anticipatory bail cannot be allowed to ..... circumvent normal procedure of arrest, recovery of stolen goods from the accused and investigation by the police. the court has also to see that .....

Satnam Singh and Another Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... indian evidence act, court may presume that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen unless he can account for his possession. thus, as per the above said presumption, recovery of stolen goods i.e.ear rings belonging to complainant gurwant kaur from the possession of accused ..... corroborated from the evidence of recovery of ear rings from the possession of petitioners thus clinching the matter against the petitioners.the learned appellate court observed as under:- recovery of stolen articles i.e.ear rings belonging to the complainant was recovered from the possession of accused as proved by si deva singh pw3 and recovery witness c. baldev singh pw4 .....

Amar Singh S/O Thakar Singh and ors. Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1949CriLJ794

..... contends that the possession of the convicts was not recent within the meaning of 8.114, illustration (a), evidence act. now, in a case of possession of stolen goods no fixed time-limit can be laid down to determine whether possession is recent cr otherwise and every case must be judged on its own merits. the presumption of ..... guilt varies according to whether the stolen articles are cr are not calculated to pass readily from hand to hand and therefore the importance to be attached to possession must vary with the circumstances of ..... but the learned deputy legal bemetnbranoer had contended that the list was in no way responsible for the purpose of establishing the identity of the ornaments which had been stolen. in our opinion we must give effect to mr. sanyal's contention, and hold that inadmissible evidence having been let in, there was clearly misdirection.10. sardar .....

Shangara Singh Ladha Singh Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1964CriLJ338

..... both.from the perusal of these two sections we find that presumption under section 114 of the indian evidence act would only arise if the recovery of the stolen goods was made soon after the theft and the accused has not been able to account for its possession, otherwise the conviction can only be maintained if there ..... indian evidence act. illustration (a) thereunder reads that the court may presume that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession.he also invited my attention to section 411, indian penal code, which ..... runs as under:411. whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with .....

The State Vs. Parkash Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1956P& H224

..... ground that the presumption raised by section 114, evidence act, namely that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen unless he can account for his possession, contravenes the provisions of article 21 of the constitution.i must confess that ..... i am of the opinion that the evidence conclusively shows that the accused was found within 48 hours of the theft in possession of a considerable quantity of stolen property, for which i do not find his explanation at all satisfactory or convincing, i consider that he was properly convicted and sentenced under section 411, peneal ..... him regarding its inadmissibility, namely that after his arrest the accused had pointed out the canteen at beas as the place where the articles recovered from him were stolen, which amounts to a confession without leading to any new discovery, did not think it necessary to discuss the evidence for the purpose of deciding whether the .....

Rajkumar Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... him in a theft case. upon notice, respondents have appeared and had filed the reply pleading that the petitioner was a habitual offender and used to deal in purchase of stolen goods and a case was registered even in april 2011 and he was facing trial in fir no.93 dated 25.04.2011, under sections 380 and 411 ipc, police station ..... wanted in case fir no.37 dated 20.02.2014, under sections 380 and 457 ipc, police station sahnewal, district ludhiana. the allegations against him are that he had purchased stolen property. this court cannot exercise its inherent powers to interfere in the investigation of the case. the petition is dismissed. may 23, 2014 (anita chaudhry) jiten judge sharma jiten 2014 ..... and wanted in fir no.37 dated 20.02.2014. it was urged that theft had taken place in the intervening night of 15/16.02.2014 and nickel was stolen by arun and vikas, which was subsequently purchased by the present petitioner and he had been named by the accused and is now wanted in the fir and he was .....

“learned Counsel for the Petitioner Submits That the Vs. State of Pu ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this court :- learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he received the stolen goods allegedly stolen by one bahadur singh and dev, who have already been granted interim anticipatory bail, vide order dated 27.05.2014. notice of motion be issued to the respondent, returnable ..... accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-19083 of 2014 2 would apprise the court that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and even the alleged stolen pieces of khair wood have since been recovered. under such circumstances, custodial interrogation of the petitioner would not be warranted. accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the order dated .....

Sohan Singh Kesar Singh Vs. State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1964CriLJ353

..... and implicating the appellant instead. gobind ram has also been described by the appellant's learned counsel to be an untrustworthy witness who is a notorious receiver of stolen goods and, therefore, not a very trustworthy witness.in so far as the testimony of smt. khazani is concerned, our attention has been drawn to her statement before ..... they were the precise articles later recovered at the approver's instance thereby throwing doubt on the recovery evidence. the recovered articles are clearly proved to be the stolen ones and they connect the approver with the crime in question. the 'bahi' has also impressed me to be a reliable piece of evidence and the attack ..... approver's testimony in material particulars but they also suggest very strongly that the accused was connected with the offence as a result of which, these articles were stolen from pokhar mai's shop. it is significant that these recoveries were made long before the arrest of harbans singh. the recovery of the piece of canto .....