Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: stolen goods Court: sikkim Page 1 of about 5 results (0.039 seconds)

Prem Bahadur Rai Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Reported in : 1978CriLJ945

..... under illustration (a) to section 114 of the indian evidence act, the accused against whom the presumption is to be drawn must be found to be in possession of the 'stolen goods soon after the theft.21. on a consideration of all the facts and circumstances of the case we are of opinion that the learned sessions judge was wrong in convicting ..... onus on the general issue is still on the prosecution, and (c) it is not the law that if the accused fails to account for his possession of the goods said to be stolen, he must be convicted, if the other facts on record do not predicate his guilt. it is not at all necessary to cite any authority for this well ..... the earring and handed over to the police who seized it under seizure memo, marked exhibit 3. he stated further that he never knew that the said ear-ring was stolen.13. the accused was examined by the learned sessions judge under section 342, code of criminal procedure, and in his statement, the accused categorically denied to have committed any .....

Veena Devi Sharma Vs. State of Sikkim through the Additional Public Pr ...

Court : Sikkim

..... ), then was excluded from the array of the accused and charge sheet was filed only against the appellant.2.6 the prosecution came with the case that the appellant had stolen a sari, belonging to a customer, from the tailoring shop of the grandmother of the deceased, namely, sarda devi sharma (pw-11), which was later on returned by the appellant ..... ). sarda devi was running a tailoring shop. a sari was given to her by a customer for some work. the case of the prosecution is that the said sari was stolen by the appellant, however, after taking her to a temple she returned the sari to sarda devi (pw-11) and while they were returning to their houses, the appellant on .....

State of Sikkim Vs. Rakesh Rai @ Vishal Rai @ Purna Rai and Another

Court : Sikkim

..... custody, in connection with a case under sections 457/380 ipc under gangtok sadar p.s. for recovery of a scooter and car purchased by the accused with the stolen money. on being interrogated, the respondent no.1, rakesh rai, disclosed that he and the other accused persons had killed bina subba and disposed of her body. the ..... the presumption of his innocence. interference with the decision of the trial court in a routine manner, where the other view is possible should be avoided, unless there are good reasons for such interference. (v) it, therefore, follows from the above that in an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court has wide powers in exercise of which it ..... deo man subba, of pelling also joined them and all of them proceeded towards sardong busty in the said vehicle. later, when the deceased sonam dadul bhutia, a good friend of accused praveen subba, heard of this, he followed them in a commander jeep bearing registration no.sk-04/4601 owned and driven by one dinesh pradhan, p .....

Madhav Chettri Vs. The State of Sikkim through the Chief Secretary, Go ...

Court : Sikkim

..... 1860 (for short the ipc ) and remained in police custody till 18-11-2013 and remanded to judicial custody thereafter. it was alleged that he was found in possession of stolen articles like, one 9 mm pistol bearing no.16109492 with live ammunitions, some case exhibits including 4 (four) gold rings, 2 (two) strips of contraband substance, etc., and ..... appreciation letter, commendation and office order are annexed herewith and marked annexure a to e). in the above mentioned legal and factual position of the case i beg your good-self to be kind enough to keep the ongoing proceedings for the proposed action in terms of rule 7 (a) (ii) of the sikkim government establishment rules, ..... summarily discharge from service in terms of rule 7 (a) ( ii) of the sikkim government establishment rules, 1974 should not be taken against me. i crave leave of your good-self to submit my show cause as follows :- i) that i beg to humbly submit that rule 7 (a) ( ii) of the sikkim government establishment rules, 1974 .....

The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Biresh ...

Court : Sikkim

..... on the part of the insured. we are in full agreement with that. to hold otherwise would lead to absurd results. just to take an example, suppose a vehicle is stolen. whilst it is being driven by the thief there is an accident. the thief is caught and it is ascertained that he had no licence. can the insurance company disown .....