Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: stolen goods Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 32 results (0.087 seconds)

Apr 25 1978 (HC)

Vijay Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1978CriLJ1619

..... has received stolen goods and knows them to be stolen unless he can account for his possession. none of the accused has accounted for this possession in this case, and ..... persons has given any explanation as to how they came into possession of these stolen articles. under these circumstances, this is a case in which illustration a attached to section 114 of the evidence act applies. according to this illustration, a person who is in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is either a thief himself or is a person who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2006 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(3)ShimLC196

..... to the prosecution as to raise presumption under illustration (a) to section 114 it must be proved that the accused person has been found in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft.20. to conclude, the acquittal recorded by the learned trial magistrate cannot be said to be visited by any illegality or dehors the ..... deposition that ornaments allegedly recovered from the shop of vivek soni appears to be brand new and recently manufactured. he at the same time admitted that the stolen ornaments were purchased by him from accused vivek soni at the time of his marriage about six years back. his explanation that these ornaments were got polished ..... far the first part of the disclosure statement inculpating the accused, is concerned, it is not admissible in evidence. now this statement led to the recovery of the stolen ornaments. however, so far the statement of vipin kumar which once again led to the discovery of the same ornaments is concerned, it is meaningless as the investigating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 1949 (PC)

Koti Darbar Vs. Ram Chand

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1950CriLJ160

..... silver ornaments, pieces of cloth, saries, dhoties, etc, worth bs. 8,000 (rupees eight thousand), they had caused grievous hurt. some of the accused produced stolen property, without making any incriminating statement, from a place not exclusively occupied by them or which was of the ownership of another person. it was held that the ..... directly involved in the thefts. he himself stole the above articlea from simla and kept them at sanjauli.... section 411, penal code deals with dishonestly receiving the stolen property and/or having honestly received, dishonestly retaining that. there must be some proof that some person other than the accused had possession of the property before ..... when the judge told the jury that upon the prosecution establishing that the accused was in possession of goods recently stolen, the jury may in the absence of any explanation by the accused of the way in which the goods came into his possession which might reasonably be true, find him guilty, but that if an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1996 (HC)

Anil Kumar and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1997HP5

..... no recovery could be made from the insurance company due to the reason that the goods which were stolen were recovered by the police on the spot and the thieves were caught red-handed and all goods stolen were 'recovered from them. since the goods were recovered by the police, no claim could be preferred against the insurance company.13 ..... the bank. further that the clausefor non-discharge of security even if the bankenters into composition with the principaldebtor as to other securities would not includepledge goods.'20 in the light of the observations made by the apex court in the case cited above, there is no dispute about the legal proposition summarised therein ..... the sale proceeds of the properties of the principal debtors which were in possession of the police and also from the insurance company with whom the hypothecated goods were insured. the learned district judge discharged the other surety, namely, shri santokh singh respondent no. 4 who was also liable for repayment of the loan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1993 (HC)

State of H.P. Vs. Raj Kumar and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1994CriLJ894

..... from forwarding note ex. pw 40/ c and the connected statement of the witness thereof, that mannu malwani accused was the purchaser of stolen idol at delhi and he was the consignee of all those goods. ganpat (pw34) had received three boxes including ex. p-15 from labourers and he had booked these with the railway vide railway ..... the interes-tedness of both these pws not only to save themselves but also to save their brother mannu malwani from the criminal liability as a consequence of recovery of stolen idol from the godown of their clearing agents, namely, madhwani & company. this letter, in fact, primarily link gokal chand accused with the commission of the offence ..... the prosecution evidence itself. at the same time, one set of evidence as discussed above, indicate that the stolen idol of 'lord vishnoo' was purchased at delhi by mannu malwani accused and therefrom it was despatched along with other goods by him to bombay vide rr ex. pm. the conclusions, arrived at by the trial court qua the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1952 (HC)

Kirpa and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1952HP68

..... appellant all that can, therefore, be presumed is that he had knowledge where the property was, but not that he was either, a thief or the receiver of goods knowing them to be stolen: chavadappa pujari v. emperor, a. i. r. 1945 bom. 292, and giyan chandra v. emperor, a. i. r. 1937 all. 47. the case against ..... articles as belonging to him, were the first to reach the scene of occurrence and even to inspect the adjoining room wherefrom the articles are said to have been stolen.the story of robbery of the articles in question appears, therefore, to be an after-thought. secondly, from what has been stated above regarding the mystery attaching ..... recoveries, haria does not claim those articles and he denies their recovery at his instance. these recoveries must however be discarded for various reasons. firstly, no list of stolen property was given in the first information report or to the police during investigation, and this inspite of the fact that near relations of the deceased who profess to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2007 (HC)

Vallabh Alloys (Private) Limited Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Corpor ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(2008)BC536

..... the machinery, articles and goods, as per inventory, were not found in the factory premises, which were allegedly stolen. however, no such copy of the fir was obtained by him and, therefore, the deposition of dw-1 that no theft took place ..... with the defendant, applying the terminology 'as is where is basis', the plaintiff is precluded from challenging the question that the induction furnace was not there or was not in good condition.14. a plea was also taken by pw-8 that he was told that an fir has been lodged in regard to theft committed in factory premises during which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2012 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Smt. Manju Rani and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... the evidence act is relevant. it lays down that a court may presume that a man who is in the possession of goods soon after the theft, is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession. the determination of the period which can come within the term 'soon before' is left ..... the evidence act is relevant. it lays down that a court may presume that a man who is in the possession of goods soon after the theft, is either the thief who has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can account for his possession. the determination of the period which can come within the term soon before is left .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1990 (HC)

State Bank of Patiala Vs. Alpna Industries and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... this stage, i cannot help observing that as per the facts admitted by the parties in the instant case, the claim with respect to the pledged goods alleged to have been stolen, was filed by the decree-holder with the insurance company concerned. as per r-3 annexed with the reply of this application, it appears that ..... holder. rather, it has been admitted that the applicants-judgment debtors have moved an application before the learned senior sub-judge, solan, for redemption of the pledged goods/ raw material to the applicants or its adjustment in value towards the outstanding dues of the decree holder.4. learned counsel for the parties have made a statement ..... national insurance company, sector-17, chandigarh, through its manager, be also impleaded for imparting proper justice to them. some of the grounds, amongst others, are that certain goods worth the value of the loan advance, that is, rs. 75,000, were pledged with the decree holder and kept in the hired premises belonging to mehar chand .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2007 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Anoop Kumar,

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008CriLJ863,2008(I)ShimLC71

..... possession.3. it was revealed during investigation that anoop kumar prepared fictitious g.r. in the name of kisan bhai goods carrier, specimen handwriting and signatures of anoop kumar were taken. during investigation it was found that 46 sleepers were stolen which were owned by partap singh and these were being illegally transported to haryana and punjab. it was also revealed during .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //