Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks act 1959 chapter i preliminary Page 1 of about 542 results (0.221 seconds)

Jul 18 1990 (HC)

Syndicate Bank Vs. Small Farmers, Marginal Farmers, Scheduled Caste an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas405(Kar); ILR1990KAR2925; 1990(2)KarLJ475

..... ) it is defined to mean : (i) a banking company as defined in the banking regulation act, 1949 ; m(ii) the state bank of india constituted under the state bank of india act, 1955 ; (iii) a subsidiary bank as defined in the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959 ; (iv) a corresponding new bank constituted under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 ..... purpose of this act, means assistance granted whether by way of loans, advances, guarantee or otherwise for agricultural purposes.' in the instant case, the plaintiff, syndicate bank, is the 'credit agency'. 5. section 70(1) of the kcs act, 1959, provides for the settlement of disputes. clause (d) of this section ..... court for which a provision is made in the act. thus examined, the court below was right in holding that the suit by the plaintiff-bank was not maintainable. 10. mr. aswathram, however, contended that the suit having been based on acknowledgment dated april 3, 1984, is maintainable. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1999 (HC)

Assam Leather Industry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... of 1998 was filed by sbi for realisation of an amount of rs. 1,05,37,890.42. the application now shall be returned to the bank, i.e., state bank of india, dimapur bazar branch, dhobinala road, dimapur, nagaland to be filed before the appropriatecourt, i.e., before the learned assistant to additional deputy commissioner (j ..... tribunal. chapter vi--miscellaneous. 14. section 2 of the act of 1993 defines 'bank' as follows : 'section 2(d) 'bank' means- (i) a banking company ; (ii) a corresponding new bank ; (iii) state bank of india ; (iv) a subsidiary bank ; or (v) a regional rural bank ; (e) 'banking company' shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (c) of section 5 ..... this connection mr. p.n. choudhury, learned central government standing counsel and mr. b. kalita, learned counsel for sbi, place reliance on a judgment in state bank of india v. t. murry aluminium conductors cable industries (dated november 18, 1998 passed by the learned single judge in civil reference no. 1(k) of 1998). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1994 (HC)

Survodaya Mills Workers Union Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant256; ILR1994KAR687

..... ) act, 1970 or a banking company as defined in the banking regulation act, 1949, or the industrial credit and investment ..... made in favour of the karnataka state financial corporation established under the state financial corporation act, 1951 or any other corporation owned or controlled by the central government or the state government or the state bank of india, constituted under the state bank of india act, 1955, a subsidiary bank asdefined in the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959, or a corresponding new bank constituted under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1997 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Singh and Etc. Vs. Bihar Industrial and Technical Consulta ...

Court : Patna

..... holding, bihar state financial corporation has 5-03 per cent share holding, bihar industrial development ..... , 1991 would show that the industrial development bank of india (hereinafter referred to as the idbi) had 49-25 per cent of its shares. industrial financial corporation of india had 11.71 percent, industrial credit & investmcnt corporation of india had 9.40% of share holdingin bitco. four nationalised banks, namely, punjab national bank, state bank of india, united commercial bank and central bank of india had 20-10 percent of the share .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2000 (TRI)

Shankar Sundaram Vs. Amalgamations Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (2001)104CompCas638

..... 1994 bom. 293), he pointed out that the law declared by the high court, right or wrong, is binding on all courts and tribunals in the state and since clb has all india jurisdiction, it is bound by the decisions of the high court cited earlier. on the same proposition, he also relied on saik girldhira supply co. ..... :-- "at the further hearing of these appeals, the learned counsel for the appellant did not press the claim to the addition of parties besides those who have expressly stated their willingness to be added, that is, the respondents 15, 16 and 20".later in the same page of the judgment, the division bench further observed : " ..... protect the interests of the minority shareholders, liberal construction should be adopted as decided in scotish cooperative wholesale society ltd.'s case (supra) as also in needle indus tries (india) ltd. 's case (supra) by the supreme court.such just and equitable interpretation is necessary to advance remedy as held in margaret dessor case [1990] 1 scc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2000 (TRI)

Standard Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(68)ECC489

..... apparels mfg. co. ltd. during the course of enquiries, the appellants came forward with a letter 23-3-1988 and gave cheque for rs. 30 lakhs drawn on the central bank of india on account of the duty leviable, if any, on the sale of the fabrics made by them to m/s. mafatlal apparels mfg. co. ltd. they also did not .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1979 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Vs. B.N. Bhattacharjee and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1979SC1725; [1979]118ITR461(SC); (1979)4SCC121; [1979]3SCR1133

..... have come to stay.(franks committee on administrative tribunals and enquiries p. 8)53. 'the advantage which tribunals had over courts' states seervai in his classic work on the constitution of india 'lay in cheapness, accessibility, freedom from technicality expedition and expert knowledge of their particular subject.' (franks committee report, p. 9 ..... conclusion that the c.i.t's opposition to the composition notwithstanding, the application for settlement shall be considered on the merits.17. the union of india, through the c.i.t. concerned, has challenged the settlement commission's decision on jurisdictional and other legal grounds. the statutory scheme, the semantics of ..... the commissioner had objected under section 245d(1), settlement commission did not allow the application to be proceeded with.15. parenthetically though, it must be stated that on the first rejection of the application by the settlement commission, the revenue moved the i.t.a.t. for restoration of its appeals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1985 (HC)

Kanta Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1987]62CompCas769(Delhi)

..... grievance on this core is too vague and imaginary. 42. that apart, mr.dewan, appearing for the reserve bank of india, had also fairly stated that notwithstanding the conduct of the petitioners, the reserve bank of india was not in any way rushing ahead in taking penal proceedings and that it was still prepared to examine sympathetically ..... . every depositor's deposit up to rs. 30,000 is fully covered. the guidelines for advances to the priority sector issued by the reserve bank of india show that they includes direct advances for agricultural purposes for raising crops and storage facilities by constructing godowns or cold storages. the small scale industries which ..... this connection, reference may be made to the circular dated july 20, 1984, issued by the reserve bank of india to various associations, bringing to their notice the provisions of section 45s(1) of the act. it was specifically stated that notwithstanding the various exemptions, it had been represented to it and the government of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2022 (SC)

Kavi Arora Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... cannot exercise unfettered discretion to redact documents necessary for the noticee to defend his case.36. the respondent sebi has, in this case clearly stated that the documents specified, namely, index of bank statements, calendar of evidence (oral) consisting of emails/letters/hard copies, calendar of evidence (documentary) consisting of emails/ letters/ hardcopies, ..... sebi which were relevant for the petitioner to reply to the show cause notice.44. rules 3 and 4 of the security and exchange board of india (procedure for holding inquiry and imposing penalties by adjudicating officer) rules, 1995 reads:- appointment of adjudicating officer for holding inquiry.3. whenever the board ..... decision of the high court at bombay in shashank vyankatesh manohar (supra) upheld by this court in 12 slp (c) no.017104/2014 titled union of india v. shanshank vyankatesh manohar. in shashank vyankatesh manohar (supra), the high court held:- 10. it is true that ordinarily this court would not entertain a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1995 (HC)

Prakash Timbers Pvt. Ltd. and Other Vs. Smt. Sushma Shingla and Anothe ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All262; [1997]89CompCas770(All)

..... on it, the board can be held only as tribunal and not court.29. learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance upon the decision in canara bank v. nuclear power corporation of india ltd., 1995 (3) jt 42, wherein the supreme court considering the provisions of section 7 and section 9-a of the special court (control ..... of courts, but the broader meaning of a curial body acting judiciaily to deal with matters and claims arising out of transactions in securities entered into between the stated dates in which a person notified is involved. an interpretation that suppresses the mischief and advances the remedy must, plainly, be given.' it is in the context ..... his individual discretion. the power so invested, is liable to be suspended and may be withdrawn. he is, therefore, not entrusted with the judicial power of the state and is merely an arbitrator authorised within the limits of the power conferred to adjudicate upon the dispute referred to him.15. a distinction between court, tribunal and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //