Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks act 1959 chapter i preliminary Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 8 results (0.083 seconds)

Prakash Timbers Pvt. Ltd. and Other Vs. Smt. Sushma Shingla and Anothe ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All262; [1997]89CompCas770(All)

..... on it, the board can be held only as tribunal and not court.29. learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance upon the decision in canara bank v. nuclear power corporation of india ltd., 1995 (3) jt 42, wherein the supreme court considering the provisions of section 7 and section 9-a of the special court (control ..... of courts, but the broader meaning of a curial body acting judiciaily to deal with matters and claims arising out of transactions in securities entered into between the stated dates in which a person notified is involved. an interpretation that suppresses the mischief and advances the remedy must, plainly, be given.' it is in the context ..... his individual discretion. the power so invested, is liable to be suspended and may be withdrawn. he is, therefore, not entrusted with the judicial power of the state and is merely an arbitrator authorised within the limits of the power conferred to adjudicate upon the dispute referred to him.15. a distinction between court, tribunal and .....

Saiyad Mustaq Ali and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

..... ceremony held on 22.3.2005. later on, as per choice of the revisionist nos. 1 and 4, the respondent no. 2 got issued two demand drafts of state bank of india, issued by mahoba branch no.0519393110 dated 13.10.2005 of rs.1,60,000/- and no.0512679507 of rs.60,000/- dated 14.10.2005 in the joint ..... conviction. this interpretation of the provisions contained in chapters xv and xvi of cr.p.c. find adequate support from the judgements of this court in r.c. ruia v. state of bombay, 1958 scr 618 : (air 1958 sc 97), vadilal panchal v. duttatraya dulaji ghadigaonkar (1961) 1 scr 1: (air 1960 sc 1113), chandra deo singh v. ..... criminal procedure code, 1973 (code) against the revisionists on the complaint moved by respondent no. 2 is under challenge. 1. factual matrix of the case giving rise to this revision briefly stated are that the respondent no. 2 (complainant) moved complaint in the court of chief judicial magistrate (c.j. m.), mahoba disclosing that marriage of his daughter was settled with .....

Dr. Bheem Rao Ambedkar Degree College Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC2162

..... and govind ballabh pant agricultural university), was prepared in the light of the recommendations made by various commissions and committees appointed by the government of india and the state government and also the views of the vice-chancellors and other educationists.2. the bill, inter alia, provides for the reorganisation of the court ..... case, hon'ble supreme court had observed the arguments advanced by the parties as under :''as against this, on behalf of the union of india, various state government and some students, who sought to intervene. it was submitted that the right to set up and administer an educational institution was not an ..... establish sufficient number of educational institutions. it was submitted that because of such reserved crunch, the states were permitting private educational institutions to perform state functions. it was submitted that the union of india, the states and universities had statutory rights to fix the fees and to regulate admission of students in order .....

Karan Yadav and anr. Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4530

..... to rs. 45.500/- and sent the same for clearance after debiting the loc account. the said cheques have been encashed and the money was received by the state bank of india. it may be that there was some delay in crediting the loc account or that he money against the three cheques were credited in the accounts of the said ..... of sub-clause 8(b) of section 3 of general clauses act, 1897. he has placed reliance on the case of major e.g. barsay v. state of bombay : 1961crilj828 , zalam singh v. uoi : air1969delhi285 (full bench). in regard to the jurisdiction of the special jdl. magistrate (cbi) he has placed before this court the provisions of sections 11 ..... by the under secretary, homes, u.p. is relevant which has been addressed to the secretary, department of personnel and training govt. of india, new delhi in which it has been mentioned that the state government has decided that the cbi may be entrusted investigation of the incident in question and as such, the orders may be got issued from .....

Hari Krishna Lal Vs. Atal Bihari Bajpai

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2003All128

..... returning officer in cash or enclosed with the nomination paper a receipt showing that the said sum has been deposited by him or on his behalf in the reserve bank of india or in a government treasury.' from the above it is evident that the deposit is required to be made at the time of the delivery of the nomination ..... rolls be revised and no election be held till then. the facts which emerge in the aforesaid case in paragraph 4 is that the chief electoral officer of the state asked for de novo revision of electoral rolls without reference to the existing electoral rolls. the district officers are alleged not to have complied with it. the election ..... was improperly rejected by the returning officer. the undisputed facts are that the petitioner filed his nomination paper on 9-9-1999. he was handed over a notice stating therein that in order to be satisfied that the petitioner was not suffering from any disqualification mentioned in section 8 of the act, he should file an affidavit and .....

Duryodhan Vs. Sitaram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1970All1

..... matter of granting adjournments. the provisions which provide for matters ancillary or consequential to the granting of adjournments would equally be applicable to the tribunal. the government of india act, 1935, uses the phrase 'with respect to' in a large number of items in the legislative lists mentioned in the seventh schedule. in united provinces ..... procedure, 1898. explanation-- for the purpose of enforcing the attendance of witnesses, the local limits of the jurisdiction of the tribunal shall be the limits of the state in which the election was held.' 22. section 97 provides for recrimination proceedings. section 98 deals with the decision of the tribunal. it reads:'at the ..... 19th april, 1965, and the subsequent days for the final hearing of the election petition. the election petitioner-appellant did not appear. the appellant's counsel stated that he had no instructions from the petitioner to conduct the case and so he was unable to appear on behalf of the petitioner but that did not .....

Prabhuji and anr. Vs. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Appointment and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... under the proviso of sub-rule (1) of rule 26 in view of o. p. garg (supra). 18. it has been stated that in the case reported in (2002) 4 scc 247: all india judges' association & others v. union of india & others), direct recruits should get 7th, 14th, 20th, 27th, 34th, 40th 47th, 54th 60th and so on, placed in 100 ..... by maxwell (11th edn. page 221). 78. tirath singh's case(supra) has been affirmed by the hon'ble supreme court in state of madhya pradesh versus azad bharat finance co. air 1967 sc 276 (p. 278), union of india versus sankalchand air 1977 sc 2328 (pp. 2337, 2358, 2373, cit versus national taj traders air 1980 sc 485 (p. 490 ..... (p. ) limited air 2000 sc 1261, air 2002 sc 1334 (pp. 1340, 1341) padmasundara rao versus state of t. n. and modern school versus union of india air 2004 sc 2236 (p. 2257). 79. in air 1958 sc 341(p. 346) central india spinning, weaving and manufacturing company limited, empress mills, nagpur versus municipal committee, wardha while construing section (66)1 .....

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Krishi Export Com. Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)4CompLJ335(All)

..... this petition has been found to be an authorised and competent officer to do so, as held in the discussion madehereinabove. the petition has been filed by the bank (rbi) through deputy general manager (dnbs). it is not so that deepak singhal, who has filed and verified this petition, is an imposter. the petition has ..... incorporated bodies. 33. the above is the statement of objects and reasons for the enactment of reserve bank of india (amendment) act, 1997. it may also be stated here that earlier to the passing of this amending act, reserve bank of india (amendment) ordinance, 1997 was promulgated by the president on 9-1-1997 and the amending act of ..... gist of reply put forth by the respondent-company may be set forth. the petition filed by deepak singhal as deputy general manager, department of non-banking supervision, reserve bank of india, lucknow is not maintainable as having been bled by incompetent person. the petition has also not been presented and verified in accordance with rule 21 .....

Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Ram Asrey Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1967All4

..... on 21-9-1961 (all), in which the learned judges, following an earlier unreported division bench decision in special appeal no. 26 of 1957, laxmi narain trivedl v. state of u. p., decided at lucknow on 19-12-1959 (all), held that a notification under section 17(4) could not legally be published simultaneously along with a notification ..... that the government is satisfied .... that any particularland is needed, .... for a company'', andthere would be no point in issuing at that stage a notification under section 4 stating that 'it appears to the ...... government thatland in any locality is needed or is likely to be needed for any public purpose it has to be conceded that in ..... judge has given his decision in favour of the petitioner-respondentsmainly on the strength of the following observation made by the supreme court in babu barkya thakur v. state of bombay and others (air 1960 sc 1203):'however, it is not correct to say that any defect in the notification under section 4 is fatal to the .....

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2007)10VST282(All)

..... (m. katju and mrs. poonam srivastava, jj.) vide common judgment and order dated january 27, 2004 reported in indian oil corporation ltd. v. state of u.p. : air2004all277 (connected with moser baer india ltd. v. state of u.p.).4. state of u.p., being aggrieved, filed special leave petitions before the apex court. those appeals (with other connected matters) were initially heard by ..... under it was not 'compensatory' and hence violative of articles 301 and 304, constitution of india (called 'the constitution') relying upon the apex court judgments in the case of atia-bari tea co. ltd. v. state of assam air 1961 sc 232 and automobile transport (rajasthan) ltd. v. state of rajasthan air 1962 sc 1406 (7 judges) wherein apex court, dealing with the .....