Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks act 1959 chapter i preliminary Page 3 of about 542 results (0.123 seconds)

United States Vs. New York Telephone Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... presented to the district court through the affidavits of its witnesses." [ footnote 23 ] the federal power commission, the securities and exchange commission, and some state commissions ( see the opinion of the new york public service commission in the instant case) have taken the same position concerning inter-affiliate transactions as ..... footnote 17 ] opinion of the new york public service commission, 1 report of the public service commission (1943) 569, 590. [ footnote 18 ] the commission stated: "new york attempted to counter these conclusions with the contention that its depreciation reserve, as a whole, is now in excess of requirements, and consequently the inflation ..... with the interstate commerce commission. interstate commerce act 20(5), 41 stat. 493, subsequently amended, 54 stat. 917. see american telephone & telegraph co. v. united states, 299 u. s. 232 , 299 u. s. 235 -236. [ footnote 5 ] the order of the federal communications commission prescribing a uniform system of accounts .....

Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited and ors. Vs. Ramesh Kamble ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR970]; 2003(1)MhLj178

..... for continuing cause of action. shri bukhari also pointed out that on the one hand the petitioners have raised the question of non applicability of the state act to the establishment on the ground that appropriate government was the central government and on the other hand, says the learned counsel, the petitioners have ..... - accused was guilty of an offence under section 48(1) of the act and, therefore, he ordered issuance of process against the petitioners accused. as stated earlier, the said order of issuance of process was challenged before the industrial court which ultimately turned down the challenge in the aforesaid revision which was dismissed ..... of the petitioner company respectively. the petitioner company is a government undertaking and the majority of the share holding of the company is with the union of india. the company is engaged in mainly manufacturing of fertilisers employing more than 3000 workers in its organisation. from the facts averred in the proceedings, it appears .....

Tapash Kumar Mazumdar S/O Dr. T. Mazumdar, New Delhi Vs. Sumit Usha Ma ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas611(Delhi); 99(2002)DLT627

..... is the assertion of the petitioner that the learned metropolitan magistrate had committed an error in taking cognizance of the alleged offence. so far as petitioner is concerned he is stated to be not the person in charge and responsible to the day-to-day conduct of the company. there was no evidence (preliminary evidence) against the petitioner to satisfy ..... is correct and the same bears my signatories at point 'a' and the same may be read as part of my evidence.'in other words, specifically it was not stated in the preliminary evidence that petitioner was in charge and responsible to day to day conduct and affairs of the company. but it had been added that the complaint is ..... material on the record.12. in this regard reference can well be made to a division bench decision of this court in the case of dhanvinder singh and ors. v. state of nct of delhi and anr. : 98(2002)dlt334 . the division bench held that at the initial stage the court was only constrained to consider the assertions made in .....

Patrick George Yadauga Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... complaint and the documents. detailed reasonings are not at all necessary. 1613. in this regard, it is useful to refer to the principles stated by the hon'ble supreme court of india. 13.1. in mehmood ul rehman v. khazir mohammad tunda and others, (2015) 12 scc420wherein at paras 20 and 21 is it ..... amit alias bilal haroon gilani as accused 2. in the second supplementary charge sheet, prosecution relies upon the statement of witnesses as well as on certain bank transactions as to flow of money into the account of the respondent afroz hasanfatta and his company nile trading corporation. the order of taking cognizance of ..... mr. patrick george yadauga occupier m/s. hindustan coca-cola beverages pvt. ltd., hirebaganal village, taluk & district:koppal. ...petitioner (by sri: harsh desai, advocate) and: the state of karnataka at the instance of sri. s.r. ravindra deputy director of factories2bellary division, bellary, (an inspector appointed under section81) of the factories act, 1948) respondent (by .....

Shyamsundar Sahu and Co. Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ363Ori

..... the labour court in order to ascertain the claim made under section 33c(2) has to decide the said facts even though disputed by the employer.4. in central bank of india limited v. p.s. rajgopalan. : (1963)iillj89sc it has been pointed out that a workman who is dismissed by his employer would not be entitled to seek ..... : (1969)illj762sc their lordships while deciding the point in question in the case reported in : (1969)iillj728sc , referred to the decision on the point in : (1963)iillj89sc , and stated that the latter decision makes it clear that all disputes arising out of claims which may be computed in terms of money are not necessarily within the terms of section ..... case are whether the services of o.p. no. 2 were terminated, and if so. whether the said termination was justified or not. the said questions, for reasons stated above, are to be adjudicated at first by the industrial tribunal in accordance with the provisions in the act, and the labour court did not have the jurisdiction to .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Amrit Sports Industries

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1983)37CTR(P& H)290; [1983]144ITR113(P& H)

..... seems to be little doubt that these provisions were directed to achieve the laudable object of curbing the evasion of tax and the generation of black money by under-stating and under-valuing the transfer of immovable properties. that this evil had attained enormous proportions (and indeed continues to grow despite these provisions) was not denied at ..... of the notice on the land-owner as also the locality notice are conditions precedent for validating the acquisition proceedings. (see in this connection rattan singh v. state of punjab ). in other words, there is a direct conflict between full benches of two courts about the principle of law which has been relied upon by ..... authority as void. in coming to that conclusion the gujarat high court had relied upon an earlier full bench decision of that high court, dungarlal harichand v. state of gujarat : air1977guj23 wherein also it was laid down that a locality notice was not mandatory in respect of a case which arose out of the bombay town .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mela Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1986)57CTR(P& H)176; [1986]161ITR78(P& H)

Pritpal Singh, J.1. Having arisen out of the same order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar, the present six appeals (Income-tax Appeals Nos. 4 to 9 of 1978) under Section 269H of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), are being disposed of together.2. The facts leading to these appeals are that by a registered sale deed dated May 5, 1973, Mela Singh Surjit Singh, Prakash Singh, Smt. Gian Kaur and Smt. Gurcharan Kaur transferred a vacant plot of land measuring 1,865 square yards situated in Krishna Nagar, Amritsar, in favour of Jagdish Chand Bhatia, Gopal Dass and O.P. Mani, for an ostensible consideration of Rs. 52,000. The Competent Authority, who was the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Acquisition Range), Amritsar, got the matter investigated in respect of the fair market value of the plot in dispute. The Income-tax Inspector who was deputed to make the investigation reported that the fair market value of the plot was much more t...

Smithkline Beecham Plc and Another Vs. Mr. Sunil Singhi and Another

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)849; 91(2001)DLT461; 2001(2)RAJ446

..... statutorily protected rights should expose the transgressor/pirate with inconvenience rather than compelling the sufferer to chase after the former. in this regard reference should be directed to brooke bond india ltd. vs. balaji tea private ltd., 1993 (18) plr 14. '62. jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this chapter:- (1) every suit or other civil ..... have no business activity in this city. the territorial jurisdiction could only be invoked if the cause of action had arisen in delhi. the plaint should have specifically stated that the defendants are manufacturing the offending drug in mumbai. a reading of sub-section (2) of section 62 of the act would dispel any doubt that the ..... not necessarily in new delhi. it ought to make not the slightest difference whether the copyright is owned by plaintiff no. 1 since plaintiff no. 2 is stated to be its wholly owned subsidiary and plaintiff no. 2 is undoubtedly located in delhi. the use of the words 'any of he plaintiffs' in section 62 .....

Ashok Organics Industries Ltd. Vs. Dena Bank and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2007]135CompCas203(Bom)

..... either by the industrial company under sub-section (1) of section 15 or by the central government or the reserve bank or a state government or by a public financial institution or by state local institutions or scheduled banks. section 16 refers to 'inquiry into the working of sick industrial companies' and to the declaration of the unit ..... thereof;(v) constitution of an appellate authority consisting of persons who are or have been supreme court judges, senior high court judges and secretaries to the government of india, etc., for hearing appeals against the order of the board.30. chapter iii contains section 15 which reads thus:15. reference to board. - (1) when ..... industries ltd., has made a reference and upon this reference hearing took place on july 18, 2005. based upon the submissions made by the assets reconstruction company (india) ltd., (arcil), a special investigative audit was directed to be conducted in the affairs of the company. further proceedings are pending in case no. 195 of .....

Hemendra Bhai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR402]; (2003)IILLJ645CG; 2003(2)MPHT1(CG)

..... evidence to show that the girl was below the age of 14 years. the statement of the surveyor was recorded by the assistant labour commissioner in which he has stated that he went to the village on the order of thesub divisional officer, bhatapara and collected information about labourers engaged in bidi manufacturing. he found ku. kevra ..... any medical certificate or birth certificate regarding the age of the child. the counsel has relied upon the judgment of allahabad high court in subhash chandra jaiswal v. state of u.p., reported in 2002 cr.lj 1223. in the said case, the labour enforcement officer under the act visited the establishment of the applicant therein and ..... to their respective houses for the purpose. 18. further, in the submissions given in writing to the district collector, raipur on behalf of the firm it is stated that-'only those persons arc given raw materials whose names have been entered in the muster rolls with an understanding that he himself is making the bidis and not .....