Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks act 1959 chapter i preliminary Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 4 results (0.521 seconds)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Amrit Sports Industries

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1983)37CTR(P& H)290; [1983]144ITR113(P& H)

..... seems to be little doubt that these provisions were directed to achieve the laudable object of curbing the evasion of tax and the generation of black money by under-stating and under-valuing the transfer of immovable properties. that this evil had attained enormous proportions (and indeed continues to grow despite these provisions) was not denied at ..... of the notice on the land-owner as also the locality notice are conditions precedent for validating the acquisition proceedings. (see in this connection rattan singh v. state of punjab ). in other words, there is a direct conflict between full benches of two courts about the principle of law which has been relied upon by ..... authority as void. in coming to that conclusion the gujarat high court had relied upon an earlier full bench decision of that high court, dungarlal harichand v. state of gujarat : air1977guj23 wherein also it was laid down that a locality notice was not mandatory in respect of a case which arose out of the bombay town .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mela Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1986)57CTR(P& H)176; [1986]161ITR78(P& H)

Pritpal Singh, J.1. Having arisen out of the same order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar, the present six appeals (Income-tax Appeals Nos. 4 to 9 of 1978) under Section 269H of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), are being disposed of together.2. The facts leading to these appeals are that by a registered sale deed dated May 5, 1973, Mela Singh Surjit Singh, Prakash Singh, Smt. Gian Kaur and Smt. Gurcharan Kaur transferred a vacant plot of land measuring 1,865 square yards situated in Krishna Nagar, Amritsar, in favour of Jagdish Chand Bhatia, Gopal Dass and O.P. Mani, for an ostensible consideration of Rs. 52,000. The Competent Authority, who was the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Acquisition Range), Amritsar, got the matter investigated in respect of the fair market value of the plot in dispute. The Income-tax Inspector who was deputed to make the investigation reported that the fair market value of the plot was much more t...

Jaskaran Singh Brar Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1310; 2005(3)SLJ354(P& H)

..... simultaneously absence of a rationale relation to the object intended to be achieved by the law.'he also relied upon the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court of india in state of kerala v. kumari t.p. roshana and anr., 1979 (1) scc 572, to submit that every inconsequential differentiation between the two things does not ..... question had not received proper consideration.55-c. refuting the allegation of treating unequals as equals shri dwivedi on the strength of judgment of the apex court in reserve bank of india v. peerless general finance and investment company ltd., 1996 (1) scc 642, argued that 'equal treatment of unequal objects, transactions or persons is not liable ..... of the petitioners that the aforementioned notification is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india, this court suo motu cannot go into its validity.he then referred to yet another judgment of the apex court in bank of baroda v. rednam nagachaya devi, 1989 (4) scc 470, to submit that there is a .....

Bata India Limited Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1983]54STC226(P& H)

..... of parliament under its residuary powers of taxation by virtue of entry no. 97 of list i. the law commission also considered the impact of kelvinator of india v. state of haryana (1973) 2 scc 551 on the important question of consignment transfers. as a solution to the problem posed, the law commission indicated its ..... other person on behalf of the manufacturer. this imposition was assailed by a number of manufacturers in this court and ultimately, a division bench in goodyear india limited v. state of haryana 1983 rlr 68 struck down the notification aforesaid as ultra vires of section 9 of the act. to override the effect of said judgment ..... essence, be negativing the whole constitutional exercise culminating in the relevant provisions of the forty-sixth amendment for confining the taxation power on inter-state consignment of goods to the union of india alone.33. in fairness to the learned advocate-general, haryana, one must refer to his insistent reliance on the single bench judgment in .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... patna sahib, patna and the sri takht hazur sahib, hyderabad, dekkan; (iii) twelve members nominated by the darbars of the indian states specified in subsection (2); (iv) fourteen members resident in india, of whom not more than five shall be residents in the punjab, co-opted by the members of the board as described in clause ..... and supply of electric power and supply of water.- xxx xxx xxx 69. provisions as to punjab state financial corporation. - xxx xxx xxx 70. amendment of act 6 of 1942.- xxx xxx xxx 71. provision as to co-operative banks.- xxx xxx xxx 72. general provisions as to statutory corporations. - (1) save as otherwise ..... transitional functioning of certain multi-unit co-operative societies. section 71 authorises the co-operative banks to continue functioning without obtaining fresh licence from the reserve bank of india, notwithstanding it being a condition stipulated in section 22 of the banking regulation act, 1949. 79. then comes section 72 of the 1966 act whereunder the .....

The State Vs. Mehar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1974CriLJ970

..... this behalf in chapter xiv of the code.34. these considerations apart, the contra view cannot be supported because of the observations made by the supreme court of india in some cases. in : [1963]2scr52 (supra), the court. while considering the right of the high court to interfere under section 561-a. criminal procedure code, ..... committing magistrate recorded the statements of two prosecution witnesses.22. feeling aggrieved against the order dated november 30, 1971. passed by the learned committing magistrate, the state government filed a revision petition before the learned sessions judge, ferozepur, who vide his order dated february 17. 1972. recommended that the order passed by the ..... high court can have a limited control or right of interference in the police investigations in exercise of its powers under article 226 of the constitution of india even before the chalan has been filed or a court has taken cognizance of the offence. khwaia nazir ahmad's case had been decided when article .....