Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks act 1959 chapter i preliminary Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 274 results (0.144 seconds)

Syndicate Bank Vs. Small Farmers, Marginal Farmers, Scheduled Caste an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas405(Kar); ILR1990KAR2925; 1990(2)KarLJ475

..... ) it is defined to mean : (i) a banking company as defined in the banking regulation act, 1949 ; m(ii) the state bank of india constituted under the state bank of india act, 1955 ; (iii) a subsidiary bank as defined in the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959 ; (iv) a corresponding new bank constituted under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 ..... purpose of this act, means assistance granted whether by way of loans, advances, guarantee or otherwise for agricultural purposes.' in the instant case, the plaintiff, syndicate bank, is the 'credit agency'. 5. section 70(1) of the kcs act, 1959, provides for the settlement of disputes. clause (d) of this section ..... court for which a provision is made in the act. thus examined, the court below was right in holding that the suit by the plaintiff-bank was not maintainable. 10. mr. aswathram, however, contended that the suit having been based on acknowledgment dated april 3, 1984, is maintainable. as .....

Survodaya Mills Workers Union Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant256; ILR1994KAR687

..... ) act, 1970 or a banking company as defined in the banking regulation act, 1949, or the industrial credit and investment ..... made in favour of the karnataka state financial corporation established under the state financial corporation act, 1951 or any other corporation owned or controlled by the central government or the state government or the state bank of india, constituted under the state bank of india act, 1955, a subsidiary bank asdefined in the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959, or a corresponding new bank constituted under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings .....

Patrick George Yadauga Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... complaint and the documents. detailed reasonings are not at all necessary. 1613. in this regard, it is useful to refer to the principles stated by the hon'ble supreme court of india. 13.1. in mehmood ul rehman v. khazir mohammad tunda and others, (2015) 12 scc420wherein at paras 20 and 21 is it ..... amit alias bilal haroon gilani as accused 2. in the second supplementary charge sheet, prosecution relies upon the statement of witnesses as well as on certain bank transactions as to flow of money into the account of the respondent afroz hasanfatta and his company nile trading corporation. the order of taking cognizance of ..... mr. patrick george yadauga occupier m/s. hindustan coca-cola beverages pvt. ltd., hirebaganal village, taluk & district:koppal. ...petitioner (by sri: harsh desai, advocate) and: the state of karnataka at the instance of sri. s.r. ravindra deputy director of factories2bellary division, bellary, (an inspector appointed under section81) of the factories act, 1948) respondent (by .....

Mr Rajesh K S N Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

..... molest the complainant victim on the same day itself. later that night, the appellant-accused forcibly entered the house of the complainant victim in a drunken state, being aware about the absence of her husband. thereafter, the appellant-accused, exerting criminal force, pounced upon the complainant victim and forcibly lifted her petticoat ..... cognizance based on a police report and a private complaint.86. in afroz mohammed hasanfatta (supra), a complaint was filed by the manager of a bank against a private limited company alleging that in pursuance of a conspiracy, the company was importing rough and polished diamonds from the foreign market and ..... material placed before him. to substantiate this contention, the appellant relied on the decisions in pepsi foods ltd. v. special judicial magistrate, fakhruddin ahmad v. state of uttaranchal mehmood ul rehman v. khazir mohammad tunda, sunil bharti mittal v. cbi and ravindranathabajpe v. bangalore special economic zone ltd. the respondent argued .....

S.A. Partha and ors. Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1961Kant220; AIR1961Mys220

..... classes proceeds on such irrational basis so completely unrelated to the object of making a special provision for the advancement of backward classes in the state that the state's action on its basis constitutes an infringement of any of the fundamental rights of the petitioner. 50. this opinion of ours receives further ..... one per cent of the total population of a district, states that in 1941, owing to exigencies of war, full and complete tabulation was not possible in several states and provinces and that in 1951 the government of india abolished caste-wise tabulation altogether. having stated that, they proceed to explain how they have arrived at ..... which decided those cases, namely, that the president of india alone has under the constitution the power to declare which classes of citizens are socially and educationally backward and that the 'state' under article 15(4) of the constitution can mean only the legislature of the state and not the executive government. these are not pressed .....

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... for the purposes of achieving the objects of article 39(b) with the protective umbrella of article 31-c. basu, in his 'shorter constitution of india' (12th edition) states,'after the amendments made by the 44th amendment act, 1978, nobody shall have any right to compensation under the constitution, unless the law which expropriates his ..... petitioners. the petitioners cannot be permitted to say that they may choose not to make the payment to the authorities like the central government and the state government, banks and public finance institutions. there is no substance in the argument of the petitioners that as the act intends to deprive them of the property without ..... be looked into and an incidental trespass would not invalidate the law, vide for example prafulla kumar mukherjee v. bank of commerce ltd., khulna and advocate general of bengal, 1947 fcr 28: (air 1947 pc60) kerala state electricity board v. indian aluminum co : [1976]1scr552 the earlier case of this court reported in a.s. .....

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Devendrappa Bujjappa Kadabi an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1987Kant129; ILR1986KAR3759

..... the plaintiff corporation is not entitled to recover the suit claim as it represents the invalid portion of the consideration of the mortgage.11.9. for the reasons stated above, points i and 2 are answered as follows:the entire mortgage transaction between the company and the defendants was not in contravention of the provisions contained ..... . the appeal is referred to a division bench having regard to the importance of the question of law arising for consideration.the appellant - the life insurance corporation of india ('corporation' for short) - is the plaintiff in the suit. respondents are the defendants. respondent-1 died during the pendency of the appeal. his legal representatives are ..... contract act itself attracted to the case; therefore, there was no questi6n of application of s. 24 of the contract act. hence the decision in eastern mercantile bank ltd.'s case cannot be held as laying down the law that sec. 24 of the contract act, applies to the completed conveyance.11.6. similar is .....

Bommegowda Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3148

..... arbitrary on the ground that it is violative of article 14, in view of the interpretation of article 14 in e.p.royappa v. state and maneka gandhi v. union of india. the third dimension of article 14 unfolded in the two landmark judgments of the supreme court furnishes the basis for striking down an act ..... its nadir through the pronouncement of the supreme court in the trio logy of decisions viz. rayappa v. state : (1974)illj172sc ii) maneka gandhi v. union of india : [1978]2scr621 and iii) ramana v. international airport authority of india : (1979)iillj217sc which have enabled the application of this article to varied situations calling for action against ..... sundaraswamy cited three decisions of supreme court viz. (i) ujagar prints v. union of india : [1989]179itr317a(sc) , (ii) express hotels private limited v. state of gujarat air 1989 sc 949 (iii) the elel hotels and investments ltd v. union of india, air 1989 sc 1664. all of them lay down the general principle that the legislative .....

M.A. Jaleel and ors. Vs. the State of Mysore by Chief Secretary to the ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1961Kant210; AIR1961Mys210

..... madhya pradesh that the cardinal principles on which the final integration of the services should rest are those--enunciated by the government of india, and that, although the state government was required to prepare a provisional list and publish it,--representations made against the correctness of that list had to be decided ..... (c) the affording of opportunity to the aggrieved service personnel to make representations to the government of india, and, (d) decisions on those representations in consultation with the concerned advisory committee. that letter also required the state to prefix to the notification publishing 'the final common gradation list' a preamble reading: 'preamble. in ..... his position, in this list on grounds connected with the establishment of equivalence of posts or any other matters relatable to states reorganisation may prefer an appeal to the government of india. he has to submit five copies of his appeal-petition in this behalf, to the secretary to the government o .....

Sarabheshwara Vidya Peetha Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR3182; 1988(3)KarLJ415

..... of an educational institution in unhealthy surroundings as also to prevent the setting up or continuation of an educational institution without qualified teachers. the state can prescribe regulations to ensure the excellence of the institution. prescription of standards for educational institutions does not militate against the right of the ..... do not violate any fundamental right of the minority institutions under article 40.'in paragraph-30 of the judgment, the learned chief justice has stated thus:'educational institutions are temples of learning. the virtue of human intelligence are mastered and harmonised by education. where there is complete harmony between ..... , namely:1. vidharbha sikshan vyavasthapak maha-sangh v. state of maharashtra & ors., : air1987sc135 . 2. state of tamil nadu v. abu kavur bai and ors., : [1984]1scr725 . 3. k. rajendran and ors. v. state of tamilnadu, : (1982)iillj259sc 4. d.s. nakara and ors. v. union of india, : (1983)illj104sc .5. central inland water transport .....