Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 18 reference secondary and working standards Page 8 of about 456 results (0.107 seconds)

Hindustan Lever Limited, Represented by Its Chairman, Mr. Banga Vs. St ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2102

..... the question arising for determination, facts-in-brief may be stated thus: state through inspector, legal meteorology, mahabubabad filed a complaint under section 72 of the standards and weights and measures act, 1976 (for short 'the act') against the petitioner-manufacturer and another retailer alleging contravention of section 39 punishable under section 63 of ..... the act r/w rule 6(i) (c) r/w iii schedule of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (for short 'the rules') and contravention of rule 23(i) punishable under section 39(2) of the rules respectively ..... declaration, made in the prescribed manner, of- (i) the identity of the commodity in the package;(ii) the net quantity, in terms of the standard unit of weight or measure, of the commodity in the package:(iii) where the commodity is packaged or sold by number, the accurate number of the commodity contained in the .....

itc Ltd. Vs. Inspector, Legal Metrology and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3306

..... the name and address of the manufacturer, total number of retail package and identity of the commodity of the package as required under rule 29(a)(b)(c) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules 1977. as such the petitioner and others are liable to be prosecuted. being aggrieved by the said prosecution, the petitioner preferred the present application ..... . 5 of 2007 on the file of the munsif magistrate, macherla, guntur district, for the offence under section 72 for contravention of section 39 read with section 63 of the standards of weights & measures act 1976, read with rule 4, rule 29(a)(b)(c) and rule 23(1) read with rule 39(1) of the ..... standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules 1977.2. the allegation of the prosecution is that the petitioner is manufacturing the cigarette packets of flpetiohl 12000 and were transporting to various destinations. .....

Kimberly Clark Liver Ltd. Vs. State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2438

..... notice was sent to the first accused by ordinary post informing him of the offence committed by him, and that could be compounded departmentally under section 73 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (for short 'the act') if they wish to do so. notice was sent to the second accused. however, both the accused failed ..... sanitary pads, packed on 29-1-2001, did not bear the complete address of the manufacturer as required under rule 6(1)(a) read with rule 10 of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (for short 'the rules'). this contravention is said to be in violation of section 39(2) of the rules. it is ..... submit that the requirements of furnishing the address of the manufacturer, as prescribed in rule 6(1)(a) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 was ultra vires of the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 and as such, was liable to be ignored.3. since the power to inspect the entire .....

Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3304; 2006(6)ALD36(SC); 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)402; (2007)1GLR594; JT2006(8)SC393; 2006(33)PTC281(SC); 2006(8)SCALE631; (2006)8SCC726

..... court, however, had overturned a part of it having regard to the statutory interdict contained in the rules made under the prevention of food adulteration act and standards of weights and measures act. 68. kerly's law of trade marks and trade names, thirteenth edition states as under about the general test for grant of an ..... by the high court on the premise that they are required to observe the statutory requirements under the prevention of food adulteration act, 1955 as also the standards of weights and measures act, 1976. non-obstante provisions 39. the non-obstante nature of a provision although may be of wide amplitude, the interpretative process thereof must ..... iv) the learned trial judge as also the high court misconstrued and misinterpreted the provisions of the 1958 act vis--vis prevention of food adulteration act and standards of weights and measures act, as in a case of such nature, a mandatory injunction could be issued directing change of the corporate name of the respondent no.1 .....

Manaksia Limited and ors. Vs. Inspector, Legal Metrology, Weights and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(2)ALT325

..... petitioner, distributed and sold through its distributors, dealers, retailers in cardboard carton package as a whole, is 'pre-packed commodity' within the meaning of section 2(1) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977. we are afraid, such a declaration cannot be given by this court in a vacuum. the petitioner has not even challenged the notice issued ..... show cause notice was issued by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner, who was a manufacturer and retail dealer in consumer care hygiene products, to compound the offence under the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the swm act'). notice was replied to by the petitioner on 16th of november 2000. respondent no. 2 was not satisfied .....

Bharati Airtel Limited Represented by Its General Power of Attorney Ho ...

Court : Karnataka

..... had seized a box containing gsm fwp and had promptly issued a notice regarding registration of a case for violation of the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 and the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules' for brevity). calling upon the said agent to compound the ..... damage on account of handling, they are kept in a packed condition. it is the petitioner's case that the third respondent, which is an authority under the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the swm act' for brevity) had inspected the premises of one of the agents of the petitioner namely. ..... hand are either sold or sought to be sold to a subscriber alongwith the services that are provided, on the face of it; in terms of the standard form agreement, which a subscriber is required to execute in availing the services provided by the petitioner, there is clearly a term which requires the subscriber to .....

Arun Singhvi Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

..... commodities act/rules'. apparently, the learned magistrate committed mistake. from the materials on records it is apparent that petitioner was prosecuted and convicted under section 63 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, hereinafter mentioned as 'the act', for alleged contravention of the provisions of section 39 of the act. petitioner impugned the judgment of conviction and ..... plain and conspicuous declaration, made in the prescribed manner, of--(i) the identity of the commodity in the package;(ii) the net quantity, in terms of the standard unit of weight or measure, or the commodity in the package;(iii) where the commodity is packaged or sold by number, the accurate number of the commodity contained in the package;( ..... or other goods from one state to another, or(ii) is effected by a transfer of documents of title to such weight, measure or other goods during its movement from one state to another.6. from the subject matter of chapter iv of the act it is apparent that .....

Hindustan Lever Limited Rep. by Its Chairman Vs. State Through Inspect ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008CriLJ608

..... be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. in fact, section 141 of the negotiable instruments act and section 74 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 are coached in identical phraseology. therefore, the judgment of the supreme court would be conclusive. the questions framed by the supreme court were answered accordingly ..... inspector, legal metrology, mehabubabad against the present petitioner for contravention of section 39 punishable under section 63 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (for short 'the act') and also under rule 23(i) punishable under rule 39(2) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (for short 'the rules'). petitioner is the a-1, who has filed .....

Dharampal Satyapal Ltd, a Company Incorporation Under the Companies Ac ...

Court : Patna

Reported in : AIR2009Pat175

..... by means of open auction or tender system which is not the case in hand. the end product (zafrani zarda) is covered by different provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, and standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985, enacted by the parliament. the said act has been given effect to by the state of bihar by means of a ..... . referring to different provisions of the said act, it is contended that the same would relate to the commodities sold in packaged form and shall bear information regarding the unit, weight and sale price of the commodities. in order to support his contention that section 15 is mandatory in nature and violation thereof will entail penal consequences, counsel relied on the .....

Jolen Inc., Rep. by Its Constituted Attorney Mr. Puran Chand Chawla Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006]130CompCas462(Mad); (2005)3MLJ81; 2006(33)PTC256(Mad)

..... proved any trans-border reputation.9. mr. arvind p. datar, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents by taking us through the relevant provisions under the companies act, 1956; standards of weights and measures act, 1976; cosmetics act,1940; packing commodities act as well as the rules framed under the relevant enactments, would contend that the name jolen was approved by the ..... name and the address of its registered office and keep the same painted or affixed on its products or goods, etc. as rightly pointed out, as per rule 6 of standards of weights and measures (package commodities) rules, 1977, the package shall bear thereon or on a label, the name and address of the manufacturer, the common or generic names of the .....