Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 18 reference secondary and working standards Page 6 of about 456 results (0.150 seconds)

Apr 09 2008 (HC)

Samir Nayar Vs. State Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4528

..... 2) sh. navneet nayar s/o sh. k. k. nayar of m/s. freeman measures ltd. g. t. road, ludhiana violated sections 41-43 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976.6. that the offence is punishable under section 62.the accused may kindly be punished in accordance with the law.7. list of witnesses1. sh. ..... nayar s/o sh. k. k. nayarof m/s. freeman measures ltd., g. t. road, ludhiana, complaint under section 41-43 read with 62 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976.1. it is respectfully prayed that after conducting inquiry sh. harpal singh, assistant controller legal metrology patiala and sh. ravinder singh, assistant controller metrology ..... brief facts giving rise to this petition are that respondent no. 2 has lodged complaint, annexure p-1 under sections 41-43 read with section 62 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as the act) in the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, ludhiana, containing the allegations that after conducting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1991 (HC)

M/S. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd., Bareilly Vs. Controller, Weights a ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1992All41

..... the impugned order. the issue was; 'whether the marking on rubber bales was as per provisions of packaged commodities rule, 1977' (the correct description of which is the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977). the finding recorded by the controller on this issue runs as follows :--'as regards issue no. 3, in case you want ..... material manufacatured by it is not sold as a pre-packed commodity.4. the trouble for the petitioner started with the issue of notice by the senior inspector, weights and measures, in which it was asserted that the petitioner was bound to have itself registered under the aforesaid rules of 1977 and inasmuch as, it had takenno ..... that the raw rubber is packed by the petitioner merely for safety during transit and to avoid contamination during storage. in fact the same are being sold by weight and not in pre-packs as defined in the rules.6. in appeal the controller formulated three issues. we are, however, not concerned with the findings on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2000 (HC)

U.P. Petroleum Traders' Association, Allahabad and another Vs. Union o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC683

..... /diesel and has issued g.o.'s yet prosecution has been made in case of even such a variation. restriction in the variation between the actual weight and standard' weight being inherent it is per se excessive and not consummate with public interest and accordingly violative of article 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india. ..... this act, into any contract or other agreement (not being a contract or other agreement for export) in which any weight, measure or number is expressed in terms of any standard other than the standard weight or measure, shall be punished with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees and, for the second of subsequent offence ..... 11. section 39, of the act readsthus :'39, penalty for keeping non-standard weights or measures for use and for other contraventions.- (1) whoever keeps any weight or measures other than the standards weight or measure in arty premises in such circumstances as to indicate that such weight or measure is being, or is likely to be, used for any : .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1997 (HC)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. S.A. Neyazi

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1998CriLJ2281

..... act, 1985, we will find that its preamble suggests as if that it is an act only to provide for the enforcement of the standards of weights and measures established by or under the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. but, if we analyse the provisions of this act of 1985, ..... complainant that the concerned packages were connected with any inter-state trade or commerce, mr. p. n. ghosh banks upon the provisions of section 33 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and submits that the provisions of the act of 1976 and the rules relating to the commodities in packaged form shall apply, ..... more than twice the maximum permissible limit as shown in schedule 2 of the relevant rules. the lpg cylinder in question was accordingly seized under section 29 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (for short, 'act of 1976') and it was kept under the safe custody of the petitioner no. 3. the complainant's .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2005 (HC)

Salu Vs. Assistant Controller

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(3)KLT520

..... cannot be exercised for releasing the vehicle since that power could be exercised only in relation to a proceeding pending before a court. the kerala standards of weights and measures (enforcement) rules, 1992 framed by the state government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 72 of the enforcement act and which ..... custody of a tanker lorry seized by the assistant controller (flying squad), department of legal metrology, thrissur, for allegedly violating section 37(1)(vii) of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the enforcement act' for short), comes up before us on a reference by one of us, ..... that the provisions of the said act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other act including the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'standards act' for short) or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any other enactment. there is a similar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1988 (HC)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1991(53)ELT234(Cal)

..... price or the normal price of the goods charged by the manufacturer to his customer as per section 4 of the central excises and salt act under the standard weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977, the manufacturer was bound to print either a maximum price exclusive of local tax or a maximum retail price on the ..... price. if the retailer sold cigarettes at a price higher than the maximum retail price printed on the packets, proceedings could be taken under the provisions of the standard weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977.11. although the duty of the manufacturer was to print the maximum retail price on the packets of cigarettes which were ..... to be cured by the new method of levy of excise duty. it was emphasised by mr. sen that the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 and the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 will also have to be read along with the notification to get a full understanding of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2012 (HC)

In the High Court for the States of Punjab Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... or by necessary implication. (14) secondly, section 27 of the act prescribes penalty for manufacture or sale of non-standard weight or measure . and which reads as follows:- 27. penalty for manufacture or sale of non-standard weight or measure.- every person who manufactures or causes to be manufactured or sells or offers.exposes or possesses for sale ..... , any weight or measure which,- (a) does not conform to the standards of weight or measure specified by or under this act; or (b) which ..... measure made or manufactured by any other person and claims such product to be a weight or measure made or manufactured by himself or itself, as the case may be. (5) chapter-ii of the act deals with 'standard weights and measures' while its chapter-iii pertains to appointment and powers of cwp no.22996 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1999 (HC)

Karnataka Bank Limited, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2000(2)KarLJ396

..... word 'transaction' used in section 24 of the enforcement act would have the same meaning as is assigned to that expression by section 2(z) of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976. section 3(o) of the enforcement act runs thus:'3(o) words and expressions used in this act are not defined but ..... transaction' has not been defined under the act. support was however drawn by mr. vishwanath from the meaning given to the said expression in section 2(z) of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (act no. 60 of 1976), which reads as under:'2(z) 'transaction' means--(i) any contract, whether for sale, purchase, exchange ..... the hearing today the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner was slightly different. it was conceded that since karnataka weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1958 was no longer in operation with the coming into force of standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 (central act 54 of 1985), the validity of the impugned notices shall have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2009 (HC)

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. the Controller of Legal Metrology and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009(2)KLJ378

..... the instant case admittedly being 225 gms, is not liable to be treated as of standard weight.16. the standard weight stipulated under the above entry is obviously in respect of the 'individual items' to be packed and never the total weight of the 'multi - piece package' defined under rule 2(j) of the rules. this is more evident from the fact that the ..... words, the idea and understanding of the respondents is that, since clause 17(c) of the 3rd schedule stipulates that the commodity to be packed shall be in the standard weight of 25 gms, 50gms, 75 gms, 100 gms, 125 gms, 150 gms and thereafter in multiples of 50 gms, the net ..... show - cause notice stating that the petitioner had committed an offence under section 39(5) of the act and rule 5 of the rules, read with section 33 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act 1985. this was replied by the petitioner vide ext. p3, explaining the facts and circumstances, also producing the requisite materials, asserting that the action .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2007 (HC)

Santanu Jagatbandhu Sinha and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2007Bom206; 2007CriLJ4664

..... is also not according to provisions of section 62 of the second act i.e. standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act 1985. this second act was brought into effect for enforcement of standards of weights and measures established by or under the standards of weights and measures act 1976 and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. to enforce the ..... section 33 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the first act). a process is issued against the accused.7. in criminal application no. 783/2007 ..... lever ltd. had offered for sale products with following description:1) 'double action blue wheel with power shine' net weight when packed 250 gms. + 25 gms. free; andii) 'green detergent cake not according to standard size.it is alleged that both these packings are in breach of rule 5 of packaged commodities rules 1977 read with .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //