Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 18 reference secondary and working standards Court: delhi Page 1 of about 100 results (0.187 seconds)

Mukul Dalmia and ors. Vs. Kiran Pal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)282; 91(2001)DLT65

..... and other witnesses were examined and on the basis of the pre-summoning evidence led a fresh order of summoning the petitioners under section 39(2) of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 read with section 420, ipc was passed. irregularity, if any, stood fully cured. the argument that the trial court could ..... that there is sufficient material on record to proceed against the respondent nos. 1,2 and 3 for the offences punishable under section 39(2) of the standard of weight and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 as well as under section 420, ipc. accordingly, all the three respondents be summoned as accused filing pf and copy of ..... 482 of criminal procedure code, 1973 (for short, cr.p.c.) seeking quashing of the order dated 17.7.1999 summoning the petitioners under section 50 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 in the complaint filed by respondent no.1 (hereinafter the complainant); on the ground that no valid cognizance could be taken without recording .....

Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... the contention is that as per the provisions of section 4a of central excise act, any notified goods in relation to which it is required under the provisions of standards of weights & measures act, 1977 or the rules made thereunder or in other law or time being enforce to declare on package thereof, the retail sale price of such ..... goods to which the provisions of sub-section 2 shall apply. the contention is that the appellant wrote to the competent authority under the standards of weights & measures act for their liability to affix the maximum retail price on the pouches in which 6 grams of chewing tobacco is packed vide letter dt.4.4 ..... of the commodities is twenty grams or twenty milliliters or less. there is no requirement of mentioning mrp. the contention is that as the authority under the standards of weights & measures act clarified that there is no need to mention the mrp of small pouches containing 6 grams of showing tobacco, therefore, the revenue cannot ask for .....

The Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and ors. ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT7; 2007(94)DRJ573

..... preferred by the court.14. it is also relevant to note that entry-50 of the union list in the constitution of india covers 'establishment of standard of weight and measure' whereas price control is explicitly covered by entry-34 of the concurrent list. packaging and pricing must, thereforee, not be treated as legal ..... act empowers the central government to 'make rules for carrying out the provision' of the act. in exercise of these powers the central government has promulgated 'the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 [hereinafter referred to swm rules]'. mr. jayant nath, learned senior counsel for the union of india and mr. midha ..... recounts that india is a signatory to the metre convention in the context of which unanimous recommendation came to be made suggesting the replacement of the standards of weights and measures act, 1956 by a more comprehensive legislation on the subject. the intendment of the bill was to provide for consumer protection in respect .....

itc Ltd. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ637; 2009(243)ELT24(Del)

..... , 1973 (crpc) seeks the quashing of complaint no. 528 of 2004 pending in the court of the special metropolitan magistrate ('smm'), shahdara, delhi under section 33 of the standards weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 ('1985 act').2. the facts in brief are that an inspection was carried out on 4th december, 2003 in a shop m/s. ..... with the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 ('1977 rules') was in fact a wholesale package which contained 10 retail packages of 20 cigarettes each. each of the retail ..... xxxxspl. mm7/7/2006.5. it is submitted by mr. sidharth luthra, learned senior counsel for the petitioner that in the first place the relevant statute is the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 ('1976 act') and not the 1985 act. he submits that the package which was found to be in contravention of the 1976 act read .....

Reebok India Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT475; 2009(242)ELT207(Del)

..... , packaging or selling of any commodity in packed form unless the package bears the label to identify the commodity in it, net quantity in terms of standards of weights and measures in the packaged commodity, adequate numbers of commodities in the package, unit sale price and the like. 15. similar view has been taken ..... declaration, made in the prescribed manner, of- (i) the identity of the commodity in the package; (ii) the net quantity, in terms of the standard unit of weight or measure, of the commodity in the package; (iii) where the commodity is packaged or sold by number, the accurate number of the commodity contained in the ..... 1. the petitioner, m/s. reebok india company has filed the present writ petition for declaration that the provisions of standards of weights and measures act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as swm act, for short) and standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as swm rules, for short) are not applicable to .....

Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd. Vs. Atlas Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT274; LC2007(3)57; 2008(36)PTC269(Del)

..... such articles on the labels/pouches on the reverse thereof, the following shall be mentioned in the minimum permissible size in terms of the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act and the prevention of food adulteration act:this product is manufactured and marketed by m/s. ramdev masala (arvindbhai group) having no relationship ..... would have come to a contrary conclusion. however, in this case the courts below proceeded on a prima facie misconstruction of documents. they adopted and applied wrong standards. we, thereforee, are of the opinion that a case for interference has been made out.8. the operative part of the impugned order dated 27.9.2002 ..... respect of such articles on the labels/pouches, on the reverse thereof, the following shall be mentioned in the minimum permissible size in terms of the provisions of weights and measures act and prevention of food adulteration act:this product is manufactured and marketed by m/s. ramdev masala (arvindbhai group) (or m/s. ramdev .....

Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI and Others

Court : Delhi

..... commencement of this act, into any contract or other agreement (not being a contract or other agreement for export) in which any weight, measure or number is expressed in terms of any standard other than the standard weight or measure, shall be punished with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, and, for the second or subsequent offence, ..... sold or kept, offered or exposed for sale, in the state. 29. section 39 of the act of 1985 provides for penalty for keeping non standard weights and measures for use and for other contravention. sections 33 and 39 of the act of 1985 are reproduced as below:- section 33 - provisions of the ..... in packaged form" shall have the meaning assigned to it in the standards act and shall include a pre-packed commodity section 39 - penalty for keeping non-standard weights or measures for use and for other contravention (1) whoever keeps any weight or measure other than the standard weight or measure in any premises in such circumstances as to indicate that .....

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Weights and Measures Department and Anoth ...

Court : Delhi

..... the offence upon payment of fine of rs.15,000/-. 5. in july 2011, the inspector, legal metrology instituted a complaint under sections 39/63 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 against the petitioner in which the learned magistrate took cognizance on 6th july, 2011. 6. the petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated ..... , the inspector legal metrology issued a notice to gkb lens pvt. ltd. as well as the petitioner to notify the breach of sections 33/39 of the standards of weight and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 punishable under sections 51/63 of the said act. it was notified that the offence was compoundable under section 65 upon payment ..... : 1. the petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated 6th july, 2011 passed by the learned metropolitan magistrate in a complaint under sections 39/63 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976. the petitioner is also seeking quashing of the criminal complaint no.cc 389/1w/11. 2. on 26th february, 2011, the inspector .....

Samsung Electronics Company Limited and Another Vs. Kapil Wadhwa and O ...

Court : Delhi

..... in para 32 of the plaint. q) additionally, it is stated that the packaging of the said printers is violative of the provisions of the standards of weights and measurement act, 1976 and the rules made therein. thus, the said act of the parallel importation by the defendants is also violative of other ..... representative of publishing industry that the scheme of copyright law was entirely different from the trade marks act and patents act 1970. the application of the standards and principles of these two laws through the proposed amendment of section 2(m) would completely dismantle the business model currently employed , rendering several industries ..... to the effect of the rights of proprietor to oppose the dealings in relation to second hand goods. mr. kaul relied upon some write up on standards and principles concerning the availability, scope and use of trade related intellectual property rights- communication from india, 10th july, 1989 wherein similar observation of international exhaustion .....

Sh. S.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)133; 104(2003)DLT116; 2003(67)DRJ709

..... permissible limit i.e. 15 ml. for 5 lt. measurement, prosecution case is made under section 39(2) of standard of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and the dispensing unit delivering short supply of petrol is ordered to be closed, until the unit is recalibrated for which permission ..... stamping authority for recalibration and on deposit of prescribed fees the dispensing unit is recalibrated. these petrol pumps are regularly inspected by the inspectorate staff of the weights and measures department from time to time. for this purpose they employee a check measure of 5 lt. (conical measure). if short delivery is beyond the ..... ml. they also found that the dispensing unit of petrol from where the petitioner had been affected delivery was delivering ok and, more importantly, that the weights and measures seals were found to be intact in all the dispensing units. accordingly, respondent no. 5 was advised to suspend sales from all the dispensing .....