Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 18 reference secondary and working standards Page 10 of about 456 results (0.191 seconds)

Sep 16 2011 (HC)

Ewac Alloys Limited, Mumbai, Rep. by Its Head of Finance and Accounts ...

Court : Karnataka

..... central government to make rules for carrying out the provisions of the said act. in exercise of the aforesaid powers, the central government made the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (hereinafter called the rules). chapter ii deals with the provisions applicable to packages intended for retail sale. ..... regard to the existing production, distribution and consumption patterns of the country or region concerned. the various enactments such as the contract act, the standards of weights and measures act, the motor vehicles act, the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, the food adulteration act etc., were found to be inadequate ..... to the subject goods so far as petitioner is concerned and etc.,) 1. the petitioners have preferred this writ petition seeking declaration that provisions of standards of weights and measures act, 1976, for short, hereinafter referred to as the act and the rules framed thereunder are not applicable to the subject goods .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2012 (HC)

V-guard Industries Limited, Vs. the Controller of Legal Metrology, Hyd ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... in respect of notice issued by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner for contravention of rule 6(1)(d) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977. no costs. the writ petitioner is directed to pay deficit court fees of rs.800/- on this writ petition. ..... conspicuous declaration, made in the prescribed manner, of- (i) the identity of the commodity in the package; (ii) the net quantity, in terms of the standard unit of weight or measure, of the commodity in the package; (iii) where the commodity is packaged or sold by number, the accurate number of the commodity contained in the ..... the respondents 2 to 9 to the petitioner for contravention of section 39 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 read with section 33 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and rule 6(1)(a) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977; and the writ petition is partly dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2015 (HC)

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Weights and Measures Department and Anoth ...

Court : Delhi

..... the offence upon payment of fine of rs.15,000/-. 5. in july 2011, the inspector, legal metrology instituted a complaint under sections 39/63 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 against the petitioner in which the learned magistrate took cognizance on 6th july, 2011. 6. the petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated ..... , the inspector legal metrology issued a notice to gkb lens pvt. ltd. as well as the petitioner to notify the breach of sections 33/39 of the standards of weight and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 punishable under sections 51/63 of the said act. it was notified that the offence was compoundable under section 65 upon payment ..... : 1. the petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated 6th july, 2011 passed by the learned metropolitan magistrate in a complaint under sections 39/63 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976. the petitioner is also seeking quashing of the criminal complaint no.cc 389/1w/11. 2. on 26th february, 2011, the inspector .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2011 (HC)

The Managing Director, Perfetti Van Melle India Private Ltd. Vs. the S ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2011(3)KLT850; 2011(3)KLJ784; 2011(3)ILR(Ker)922; 2011(3)KHC741

..... filed by the second respondent alleging commission of offences punishable under section 39(4), 63 and 67 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereafter referred to as act) r/w rules 4, 6(1), 12(6), 23(1) and 39 ..... of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules 1977 (hereinafter referred to as rules). 2. on 1.9.2003 the second respondent was ..... . unlike the word extra which may not describe the actual quantity of commodity contained in the package exhibited for sale, here, the weight of the commodity contained in the package was specified and it would create no doubt nor can it mislead the consumer. the object of ..... when the commodity was packed. the other offer made is only free; it does not from part of the declaration as to the net weight of the commodity contained in the package. so far as it relates to this case the word free means: costing nothing, gratuitous (blacks .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2002 (HC)

Indian Rayon and Industries Limited a Company Incorporated Under the C ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1668; 2003(2)MhLj464

..... moreswar, patankar marg, piperoad, kurla, mumbai in respect of violation ofprovisions of section 39 of the standards ofweights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafterreferred to as 'the act' for convenience) and rule23 (1) of the standards of weights & measures(packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (hereinafterreferred to as 'rules' for convenience).2. shri t ..... .k. patil filed a complaint in thecourt of metropolitan magistrate room no. 31,vikhroli, mumbai, alleging that the petitioner didnot mention the date of manufacture of 'birlawhite portland cement' though the net weight, ..... has been brought to shop orcommercial institute for sale or for exhibition tosale. if the month and year of manufacture hasbeen printed, the weight has been mentioned,retail price (inclusive of all taxes) has beenmentioned, it would be sufficient compliance ofthe provisions of the act and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 2016 (HC)

Titan Industries Limited and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... mumbai, to indicate that the said petition has been allowed in the terms of prayer clauses 'a' and 'b' after concluding that the provision of the standard of weights and measures act, 1976 and the standards of weights and measures act, 1985 would not apply to the petitioner, it's outlets, showrooms and place of display or sale or storage. 5. the copy of ..... summary criminal case no.515 of 2005 pending in the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, osmanabad. it is stated that the state had made the standard of weights and measures act, 1976 and the standards of weights and measures act, 1985 applicable to the petitioner. 2. it is pointed out that this court by its order dated 06.09.2005 had passed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2012 (HC)

Samsung Electronics Company Limited and Another Vs. Kapil Wadhwa and O ...

Court : Delhi

..... in para 32 of the plaint. q) additionally, it is stated that the packaging of the said printers is violative of the provisions of the standards of weights and measurement act, 1976 and the rules made therein. thus, the said act of the parallel importation by the defendants is also violative of other ..... representative of publishing industry that the scheme of copyright law was entirely different from the trade marks act and patents act 1970. the application of the standards and principles of these two laws through the proposed amendment of section 2(m) would completely dismantle the business model currently employed , rendering several industries ..... to the effect of the rights of proprietor to oppose the dealings in relation to second hand goods. mr. kaul relied upon some write up on standards and principles concerning the availability, scope and use of trade related intellectual property rights- communication from india, 10th july, 1989 wherein similar observation of international exhaustion .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2003 (HC)

Sh. S.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)133; 104(2003)DLT116; 2003(67)DRJ709

..... permissible limit i.e. 15 ml. for 5 lt. measurement, prosecution case is made under section 39(2) of standard of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and the dispensing unit delivering short supply of petrol is ordered to be closed, until the unit is recalibrated for which permission ..... stamping authority for recalibration and on deposit of prescribed fees the dispensing unit is recalibrated. these petrol pumps are regularly inspected by the inspectorate staff of the weights and measures department from time to time. for this purpose they employee a check measure of 5 lt. (conical measure). if short delivery is beyond the ..... ml. they also found that the dispensing unit of petrol from where the petitioner had been affected delivery was delivering ok and, more importantly, that the weights and measures seals were found to be intact in all the dispensing units. accordingly, respondent no. 5 was advised to suspend sales from all the dispensing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1913 (FN)

Schmidinger Vs. Chicago

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and size of the loaf, the atmospheric condition, and the dryness and temperature of the place where kept. it appears that, in order to insure bread of the standard weight of sixteen ounces, it is necessary to scale the dough before baking at about twenty ounces. the record also shows that, although the price of bread sold by ..... that a full pound loaf, with the variations provided, would page 226 u. s. 589 furnish the best standard. it has not fixed the price at which bread may be sold. it has only prescribed that the standard weight must be found in the loaves of the sizes authorized. to the argument that to make exactly one pound loaves ..... be made for them. this court has had frequent occasion to declare that there is no absolute freedom of contract. the exercise of the police power fixing weights and measures and standard sizes must necessarily limit the freedom of contract which would otherwise exist. such limitations are constantly imposed upon the right to contract freely page 226 u. s .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2015 (HC)

Kamla Kant ? Kamal Kant and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... against the petitioners, the offence is clearly made out against the petitioners and accordingly, there is no illegality in the impugned order.6. section 63 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 reads as follows:-"3. cognizance of offences.-notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)- ..... that only other allegation against the petitioners is that of tampering with the seal of the outfits, which is clearly covered by section 37 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, and this being an offence under the special act, no cognizance could be taken against the petitioners under the general ..... to be continued. learned counsel has taken a short point in support of his contention, drawing the attention of this court towards section 63 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985, submitting that there is a complete prohibition for taking cognizance under the said act, except on the basis of a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //