Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 18 reference secondary and working standards Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 24 results (0.095 seconds)

Jul 29 2004 (TRI)

Kraftech Products Inc. Vs. C.C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(173)ELT508Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 10ml. therefore, the appellants' multi-piece packages having only 9gms in the multi pack under consideration is clearly exempt from the requirement of declaration of mrp under standard weight and measures act. in other words, it is not legally obligatory declare mrp of such packages.5. the first proviso to rule 34(b) provides that the ..... provisions of section 4a of the central excise act will not be applicable for ....... of assessment of duty on such packages. rule 34b of the rules under standard and weight and measures act is very clear and unambiguous. the sub-rule (b) thereof, provides that the provisions of the packaged commodities rules will not be applicable ..... .11.1999 which in para 2 and 3 provides as under. the matter has been examined. multi-piece package has been defined under rule 2 of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 as follows: "multi-piece package" means a package containing two or more individual packaged or labelled pieces of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2005 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Urisan Cosmetics Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... the appellants multi-piece packages having only 9 gms in the multi pack under consideration is clearly exempt from the requirement of declaration of mrp under the standard weights and measures act. in other words, it is not legally obligatory to declare mrp of such packages".cce, daman v. kraftech products inc.dealt with ..... law for the time being in force to declare on the package thereof the maximum retail sale price of such packaged goods.the standards of weights & measures act, 1976 and the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 require the marking of the retail price, batch number etc as prescribed for various commodities. ..... pieces contained in such multi-piece package (if such individual pieces are capable of being sold separately) is statutorily required under rule 17(1) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977. (ii) that in respect of multi-piece packages of a commodity intended for retail sale and which are notified .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2007 (TRI)

Mehernosh Randeria Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (Acc),

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... single pieces in polythene bag for the purpose of transport and were not in a packaged condition. the question of plugs and sockets therefore being covered by the standard of weights and measures act does not arise as they were not in a packaged condition. the package containing single piece of mccbs was affixed with a label stating, ..... the packaged commodities rules and therefore no mrp was required to be declared. it was also submitted that if the goods are packaged in single pieces, provision of standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 do not apply as has been held by the kerala high court in the case of peico electronics & electricals ltd. v ..... and the other mccbs were packed in single piece carrying a declaration as required under rule 34 of the packages rules and were therefore not covered under the standard of weight and measures act as per decision of the keral and andhra pradesh high. court cited by the appellants and the provision of rule 34. there is no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2009 (HC)

Britannia Industries Limited, Being a Company Registered Under the Pro ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR76; 2009(111)BomLR3245

..... the mass of the international prototype of the kilogram. section 21 prohibits the use of non-standard weight or measure and is as under: section 21:-use of non-standard weight or measure prohibited ' no weight, measure or numeral, other than the standard weight, measure or numeral shall be used as a standard weight, measure or numeral.section 39 mandates declaration of the quantities and origin of commodities in ..... % free but started marketing their 50-50 biscuits in the packet consisting of 75 grams with additional 25 grams free so as to make total weight of the package to 100 grams which is one of the standard weights mentioned in the iii schedule. however, apprehending further action being taken in respect of the packages wherein 20% has been given free along with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2006 (HC)

Raj Marketing Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2007Bom76; 2007(3)ALLMR195; 2007(2)BomCR824; 2007(1)MhLj654

..... identify of the commodity contained in the package; and the total number of retail packages contained in such wholesale package or the net quantity in terms of standard units of weights, measures or number of commodity contained in wholesale package provided that nothing in this rule shall apply in relation to a wholesale package if a declaration similar ..... in a package showing the price as rs. 35/-. the printed price on the package shows mrp as rs. 30/-. rule 23 sub-rule (6) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977, hereinafter referred to as the rules, reads as under:(6) no retail dealer or other person shall obliterate, smudge or alter ..... the agarbatti packages as a specific notification has not been issued in respect of a packed commodity like agarbatti as required under section 2(3)(d) of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, which hereinafter shall be referred to as the act.(2) in so far as the seizure of the wholesale packages of candyman, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1986 (HC)

Gtc Industries Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC33; 1989(23)LC239(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT925(Bom)

..... it may be noted that the prices are marked on the packets of cigarettes as on the packets of several other commodities under the provisions of the standard of weights and measures act, 1976. it has been argued that if that if the retailers are selling the cigarettes at a price higher than the one which is ..... petitioner's products are sold. in paragraph 8 of the petition it has been specifically stated that under the rules made under the standard of weights and measures act, 1976, the rules being called the standard of weights and measures (packed commodities) rules, 1977, manufacturers who pack goods in package intended for retail sale are required to mention on ..... leviable. according to mr. setalwad, the explanation to sub-rule (3) of rule 8 restricts the meaning of 'form or method' to 'the basis, namely, valuation, weight, number, length, area, volume or other measure with reference to which the duty is leviable'. the respondents must now justify the fixation of the basis of exemption by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1995 (HC)

Colfax Laboratories (India) Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR263

..... in various states. 4. on 25th may, 1990, the ministry of food & civil supplies issued a notification bearing no. g.s.r. 511(e) under section 83 of the standards of weights & measures act, 1976. by reason of applicability of the said notification, the petitioners are required to print on the packages of the items marketed by the petitioners, the 'maximum retail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2001 (HC)

indus Videotronics and anr. Vs. Digambar M. Badodkar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)2009

..... packages of toys were seized and the prosecutions were lodged in the metropolitan magistrates' courts in mumbai. after the complaints were filed under the provisions of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and the rules made thereunder, process was issued against the petitioners. by these petitions the petitioners seek to challenge the process ..... who have the copyright have made those video cassettes which were seized by the prosecuting agency for not complying with the conditions under the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act and the rules in that behalf. reference to section 52a of the copyright at is also relevant at this stage. sub-section (2 ..... is said to be making such video film and, therefore, in my view, would be covered by or fall under clause (h) of rule 2 of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 197713. referring to the word 'consumer' in rule 2(r) of the rules of 1977 which defines 'retail sate price', mr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1982 (HC)

Noble Trading Co. and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1983Bom108

..... as to how and when this was noticed, there is clearly nothing in the act to prevent the authorities from bringing such users to book for using non-standard weights or measures or non-stamped weighing or measuring instruments. the petitioners however cannot be held liable for use of their tapes for some other purpose than the ..... force or be kept in any premises where such transactions are usually conducted'.here again the prohibition against using any unit of mass or measure other than the standard weights or measures is restricted to transactions for trade or commerce in any area or class of goods or undertakings in respect of which this provision has come into ..... which reads as follows ;--'7. 910 notwithstanding anything contained in any other law or custom, usage or practice, no unit of mass or measure other than the standard weights or measures, shall be used in any transactions for trade or commerce in any area or class of good or undertakings in respect of which this section has come .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2012 (HC)

Sharad Baburao Latkar Vs. Sharad Wasudeodas Gujar and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant hold no merit. moreover, these sections prohibit use of any custom or usage which is contrary to the standard weights or measures and states that such custom shall be treated as void. however, this is an enactment of 2009 which came into force with effect from 14. ..... rule, order, contract, deed or other instrument in terms of any unit of weight, measure or numeration other than that of a standard unit of weight, measure or numeration. (2) on and from the commencement of this act, no weight, measure or number other than the standard weight, measure or number shall be used in, or form the basis of, ..... the net quantity of a pre-packaged commodity, or (e) express in relation to any transaction or protection, any quantity or dimension, otherwise than in accordance with the standard unit of weight, measure or numeration. (2) the provisions of sub-section (1) shall not be applicable for export of any goods, things or service." "12. any custom .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //