Skip to content


Self Developement - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: self developement Year: 2020 Page 1 of about 376 results (0.047 seconds)
Jul 14 2020 (SC)

Director General (Road Development) National Highways Authority of Ind ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-14-2020

..... programmes policies or projects the impugned notification reads as follows government of maharashtra urban development department70madam cama road hutatma rajguru chowk mantralaya mumbai 4000032 government resolution no tps 1817 ..... years therefore the legislative intent is clear to keep section 14 and 15 as self contained jurisdictions 46 further section 18 of the act recognizes the right to file .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2020 (SC)

Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and Ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-06-2020

..... imperative need to recognise rehabilitation and resettlement issues as intrinsic to the development process formulated with the active participation of affected persons and families ..... 24 1 b in our opinion section 24 1 b is a self contained provision and is also a part of the non obstante ..... his own wrong he may not plead in his own interest a self created necessity kish v taylor 1911 1 k b 625 per .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 2020 (SC)

Bengaluru Development Authority Vs. Mr. Sudhakar Hegde

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-17-2020

process under the 2006 notification serves as a balance between development and protection of the environment there is no trade off

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 2020 (HC)

Soverign Developers And Vs. The Assistant Director

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-11-2020

void in w p no 24480 2018 between 1 soverign developers and infrastructure ltd a company incorporated under the companies act1956

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 2020 (SC)

National Co-Operative Development Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Inco ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-11-2020

..... appellant corporation has devised a procedure of sanction disbursal of its system for institutional development of cooperatives the appellant corporation actually supplements the efforts of the state governments thus ..... not 20 material as profit making is not an essential ingredient on account of self imposed and innate restriction arising from the very statute which creates the appellant corporation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 21 2020 (HC)

S K Shankarappa Vs. The Panchayath Development Officer

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-21-2020

area deliberately and that he had quarreled with the panchayat development officer all the allegations noticed in the show cause notice

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 2020 (SC)

M/s L And T Housing Finance Limited Vs. M/s Trishul Developers

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-27-2020

..... l t housing finance ltd and the respondents m s trishul developers through its partners towards completion of its project the appellant ..... in favour of the respondents and further submits that the self same authorised signatory being there of both the companies use ..... with all its customers use a common letterhead having their self same authorised signatory as being manifest from the record and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 2020 (SC)

Wonder Projects Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-11-2020

survey numbers wherein the project of the appellants is being developed a reference is made and in the remark it is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 2020 (SC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Centre for Environment Protection Research ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-28-2020

of the environment protection act 1986 is to ensure sustainable development this is a concomitant of the right to life under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2020 (HC)

Sri C. Kumaraswamy Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-10-2020

commissioner 2 state of karnataka by its secretary to urban development department m s buildings bengaluru 560 009 2 r 2

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //