Self Developement - Judgment Search Results

Development of Industries (India) Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Inc ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1968Cal492,[1968]68ITR310(Cal)

following effect resolved that the managing agency agreement with messrs development of industries india private limited be and is hereby terminated

Commissioner of Income-tax Central, Calcutta, and anr. Vs. Amalgamated ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC1475; [1967]65ITR395(SC); [1967]3SCR263

therefore for the purchasers was that the respondent company would develop the land and the purchasers would be able to pay

Mohanlal Nathubhai and ors. Vs. R.M. Desai Development Commissioner, S ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1968)9GLR991

..... in the show cause notice were refuted and explained however the development commissioner passed the impugned order on november 9 1966 and ..... the electorate and participate in the functions of the local self government of the gram it was conceded by mr nanavaty ..... through their elected representatives in the panchayat as a unit of self government an intention so unreasonable to make the sar panch .....

V. Perumal Vs. State of Madras, Represented by the Secretary to Govern ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1968)1MLJ27

be a reference to a panchayat village panchayat town panchayat development block or panchayat union as the circumstances may require the

Sham Dass Chawla Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 3(1967)DLT593

1965 a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant delhi development authority from determining the lease of the plaintiff in respect

Udall Vs. Fpc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... proposal was best adapted to the river s development in part because federal development could not reasonably be immediately anticipated the secretary ..... decision with modifications not material here the issue of federal development has never been explored in this record the applicants introduced ..... employed i can only conclude that the court despite its self serving disclaimer ante pp 387 u s 450 451 has .....

Nellal Cotton Mills Vs. First Income-tax Officer, Tirunelveli.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1968]70ITR66(Mad)

it was not entitled to allowance of the claim for development rebate incur view the facts as presented originally before the

Jay Engineering Works Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1968Cal407,72CWN440

investigation and after four days when the matter had so developed that there was some reason to believe that m had

Workmen of Hindustan Motors Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Motors, Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1968SC963; [1968(16)FLR450]; (1969)ILLJ523SC; [1968]2SCR311

the depreciation provision of rs 325 48 lacs and available development rebate reserve of rs 39 51 lacs must be taken

Veerabhadra Iron Foundry and Another Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, A ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1968]69ITR425(AP)

we hold that the assessee is entitled to relief towards development rebate claimed by him we accordingly answer this question in