Self Developement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: self developement Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 643 results (0.063 seconds)Smt. Khirodini Sahoo Vs. State of Orissa Represented Through Its Commi ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Mar-01-1996
Reported in: 82(1996)CLT32; 1996(I)OLR387
can only involve the authority and the person making unauthorised development in such proceeding the original complainant is neither a necessary
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevelopment Consultants Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Gift-tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-13-1996
Reported in: (1997)61ITD119Cal
1981 on the subject a copy of which is enclosed development consultants private limited dcpl applied for land in the salt
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevelopment Investors Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-03-1996
d n baruah j 1 as per direction given by this court in civil rules nos 11 m of 1992...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Haryana State Cooperative Land Development Banks Employees Union V ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-20-1996
Reported in: (1997)115PLR825
land development bank at chandigarh and the primary cooperative land development banks in the state of haryana the haryana state cooperative
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Bhattacharjee Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-1996
Reported in: 63(1996)DLT467; 1996(38)DRJ343
matters ancillary thereto the very object for which the delhi development authority has been constituted is to promote and secure the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManjulaben Bhailalbhai Patel and ors. Vs. Vadodara Urban Development A ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-10-1996
Reported in: (1996)2GLR588
or suggestions made by the aggrieved persons against a draft development plan under section 14 or section 15 of the act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAhmedabad Urban Development Authority Vs. Manilal Gordhandas and Other ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-11-1996
Reported in: AIR1996SC2804; (1996)3GLR580; JT1996(8)SC647; 1996(6)SCALE687; (1996)11SCC482a; [1996]Supp6SCR79
growth of the cities has to be enforced through proper development plans for every city as was done in ahmedabad in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. the Industrial Development ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-06-1996
Reported in: 1996VIAD(SC)761; AIR1997SC482; (1996)98BOMLR609; JT1996(8)SC16; (1997)1MLJ49(SC); 1996(6)SCALE379; (1996)11SCC501; [1996]Supp5SCR551
..... monopolies restrictive trade practices act it submitted to the state government its proposals for the development of the area put under its planning jurisdiction after following the procedure prescribed therein ..... before submitting the plan for approval by the state government take for instance the self same land under the approved scheme under monopolies restrictive trade practices act which was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.A. Builders Vs. Delhi Development Authroity
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-1996
Reported in: 1996VAD(Delhi)153; 63(1996)DLT732; 1996(39)DRJ332
present application is as to whether the applicant respondent delhi development authority has shown 335 sufficient cause within the meaning of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others and In ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-23-1996
Reported in: 1996VAD(SC)678; AIR1996SC2462; 82(1996)CLT875(SC); JT1996(6)SC685; 1996(5)SCALE414; (1996)9SCC709; [1996]Supp3SCR808
submitted that tisco had played a pioneering role in the development of chromite and other minerals in the area had been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial