Self Developement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: self developement Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 461 results (0.053 seconds)State of U.P. Vs. Smt. Pista Devi and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-12-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC2025; 1986(2)SCALE423; (1986)4SCC251; [1986]3SCR743
of the view that the above provision in the delhi development act contains a wholesome principle which should be followed by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWhite Hill Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-1986
Reported in: 30(1986)DLT234; 1986(11)DRJ33
than in conformity with such master plan or such zonal development plan the prohibition contained in section 14 would thereforee be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSiddalingappa Vs. Bangalore Development Authority
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-13-1986
Reported in: ILR1986KAR3023
act as it is already pointed out deals with the development scheme if act no 17 of 1984 has to be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSahib Singh Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-1986
Reported in: 1987(12)DRJ170
was quashed subsequently the writ petition was amended and delhi development authority was deleted from the array of respondents and the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLucky Star Estates (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authorities
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-01-1986
Reported in: 1987(12)DRJ229; 1987RLR147
plaintiff in the following circumstances 2 the defendant the delhi development authority in its capacity as a statutory body and in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka State Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karnataka ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-01-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC2039; 1986(2)SCALE579; (1986)4SCC421; [1986]3SCR1008; 1987(1)LC253(SC)
..... for preference to be given to applications for permits from the indian tourism development corporation the state tourism development corporation and the state tourist department were not questioned but the preference provided ..... of the statute is that reservation was to be made by a landowner to enable self cultivation and so landowners could eject tenants but since agrarian reform must promote not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndia Tourism Development Corporation Vs. R.S. Khanna and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-1986
Reported in: 30(1986)DLT475
absorbed in other hotels being run by the india tourism development corporation what mr bhandari says is that some workers may
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjai Pal Singh and ors. Vs. Bareilly Development Authority, Bareilly a ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-06-1986
Reported in: AIR1986All362
bareilly and its secretary on the ground that the bareilly development authority was estopped from changing the conditions subject to which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishwa Bharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Bangalore ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-14-1986
Reported in: ILR1987KAR767
a act is to provide for the establishment of a development authority for the development of the city of bangalore and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrimary Co-operative Land Development Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-1986
Reported in: ILR1986KAR427
mortgage bank for each revenue taluk called as primary land development bank of the taluk pld bank from 26 6 1965
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial