Self Developement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: self developement Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 457 results (0.316 seconds)Workmen of the Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co., Ltd., Guntur Vs. t ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC860; [1970(20)FLR269]; [1969]2SCR282
an industrial dispute between the respondent the indian leaf tobacco development company limited guntur hereinafter referred to as the company and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatubha K. Vaghela Vs. Moosa Raza, the District Development Officer
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-21-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR23
facts and circumstances and the point mr vyas seeks to develop even at this stage is itself on all the admitted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWool Industry Development Co-operative Association Ltd. Vs. Khadi and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-1968
Reported in: ILR1968KAR638; (1968)2MysLJ136
of that act the purpose of the act was the development of khadi and village industries and other matters connected therewith
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMansa Nagar Panchayat and anr. Vs. A.K. Chakravarty Dist. Development ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-19-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR88
a noti fication to 15 8 1968 thereafter the district development officer by a notification dated 3 7 1968 has notified
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetal Box Company of India Ltd. Vs. their Workmen
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC612; [1969]39CompCas410(SC); [1969(18)FLR336]; [1969]73ITR53(SC); (1969)ILLJ785SC; [1969]1SCR750
have made no contribution in earning them so far as development rebate is concerned section 6 b allows the whole of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Special Tahsildar, La ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Mad305
..... the government would consider any application of the petitioner for a developed site on merits would appear to be self contradictory while the policy of the government would appear to encourage ..... public purpose further the state govfernment have allotted plots to various industrialists after acquisition as developed sites ranging from 20 acres to one acre the petitioner company has purchased about .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Special Tahsil ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1968
Reported in: (1968)2MLJ273
..... the government would consider any application of the petitioner for a developed site on merits would appear to be self contradictory while the policy of the government would appear to encourage ..... various applicants to start industries when the petitioner company itself has purchased the lands for developing or expanding their business activities in the south cannot be called acquisition of lands .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ellerman Lines Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-10-1968
Reported in: [1970]75ITR47(Cal)
commissioner 7 the other question relates to the allowance of development rebate which the appellate assistant commissioner had ordered to be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundaram Motors Private Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-1968
Reported in: [1969]71ITR587(Mad)
government of india in 1953 inter alia to recommend a development rebate to the entrepreneurs in industry the enquiry was instituted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: the India Electric Works Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Cal398
taken in the said application are 1 that the industries development and regulation act 1951 is ultra vires as it imposes
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial