Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 8 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Sorted by: old Year: 1965 Page 1 of about 477 results (0.449 seconds)
Jan 01 1965 (HC)

Riyasat Ali Khan Vs. Mirza Wahid Beg and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-01-1965

Reported in : AIR1966All165

..... notice of termination the confusion about the scope section 8 114 has been caused by section 3 1 a of the u p control ..... grant the tenant relief against forfeiture on conditions specified in the section but in a tenancy which runs from month to month no ..... notice bar is removed landlord determines tenancy by a notice under section 106 nobody to invoke forfeiture clause held no relief against forfeiture .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1965

Dennis Vs. U.S.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1965

382 and united states v brown 381 u s 437 section 9 h of the taft hartley act is constitutional 3

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1965

U.S. Vs. Utah Construction and Mining Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1965

co no 440 supreme court of the united states november 8 1965 acting solicitor general spritzer assistant attorney general douglas morton

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1965

Simmons Vs. Union News Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1965

breach of contract in discharging her page 382 u s 884 886 although this court has gone very far in some

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1965

United Gas Imp Co. Vs. Callery Properties, Inc

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1965

of new york inc and others as amici curiae march 8 1965 the motion of consolidated edison company of new york

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1965 (HC)

Rama Kant Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-04-1965

Reported in : AIR1966All173

specialappeal and it is dismissed summarily i tenancy khudkasht holder section 18 of u p zamindari abolition and land reforms act

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1965 (HC)

Sher Singh Budh Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-04-1965

Reported in : AIR1965P& H361

it is well settled that the definition of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and area of village kilianwali contained voters nos 1232 to 2130 8343 to 8671 and 10281 to 10291 the total number of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1965 (HC)

Om Sarup Nand Lal Vs. Gur NaraIn and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-04-1965

Reported in : AIR1965P& H367

..... 1956 at the instance of shri om sarup in the application under section 24 and 151 and order 13 rule 10 civil procedure code dated the ..... code of civil procedure of course provides for the applicability of section 5 indian limitation act to the application filed under rule 9 ..... it is however unnecessary to say anything more on this occasion 8 in so far as the merits of this application are concerned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1965 (HC)

Official Receiver, Palghat District Vs. Kutilingal Itty's son, Krishna ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-04-1965

Reported in : AIR1965Ker156

..... of the learned subordinate judge of ottappaiam in a proceeding under sections 53 and 54 of the provincial insolvency act on grounds ..... the learned subordinate judge of ottappaiam in a proceeding under sections 53 and 54 of the provincial insolvency act on grounds ..... circumstances will only go against the genuineness of the promissory notes 8 another important circumstance is thateven rw 1 the agent of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1965 (SC)

M.R. Patel Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-1965

Reported in : AIR1966SC343; 1965(0)BLJR443; [1965]2SCR693

..... objection 7 in the result the appeal is dismissed with costs 8 appeal dismissed commercial security deposit sections 8 and 8 3 of bihar and orissa excise act 1915 appellant a licensee ..... be increased deputy commissioner referred matter to board of revenue bor bor decided under section 8 proper security should be demanded from appellant appellant preferred appeal before supreme court observed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //