Section 8 - Judgment Search Results

Shah Mansur Peer Dargah and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1980Kant118; 1980(1)KarLJ469

..... light of these well settled principles we have to examine whether sub section 8 of s 25 of the act prescribing a period of limitation for ..... of wakfs created on or after the commencement of the act sub section 8 of s 25 of the act provides for the filing of an ..... light of these well settled principles we have to examine whether sub section 8 of s 25 of the act prescribing a period of limitation for .....

City of South Lake Tahoe Vs. California Tahoe Regional Planning

Court : US Supreme Court

al v california tahoe regional planning agency et al no 80 458 supreme court of the united states december 8 1980

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Travancore Tea Estates Co. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1980)16CTR(Ker)100; [1980]122ITR557(Ker)

on the upkeep of buildings would satisfy the provision in section 40 a v of the act or in other words d dhunjoobhoy 1 9604 9576 917mr george joseph 1 9604 8216 781mr p o machiah 1 9605 1597 119mr r p

Ramesh Chemical Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1992(40)ECC199; 1980(6)ELT598(MP); 1980MPLJ479

drug contained in the act drug is however denned in section 3 b of the drugs and cosmetics act 1940 as the reducing sugars expressed anhydrous dextrose amount to more than 80 by weight 14e patent or proprietary medicines not containing alcohol

Saraswatibai Vs. Durga Sahai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1982MP147

..... of civilprocedure suits are consolidated under the inherent powers of the court under section 151 c p c after consolidation there is only one case and the ..... such a suit is to have benefit of expt 6 section 11 the conditions of rule 8 must have been complied with fully x x x x ..... explanation 6 section 11 is controlled by order 1 rule 8 and if a court allows a suit to which .....

Hakam Singh and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1980)17CTR(All)255; [1980]124ITR228(All); [1981]5TAXMAN96(All)

..... imposed or imposable on a person under clause i of sub section 1 of section 271 for failure without reasonable cause to furnish the return of ..... imposed or imposable on a person under clause i of sub section 1 of section 271 for failure without reasonable cause to furnish the return ..... prompted by a sense of fear does not appear to be unjustified 8 the question is whether a return filed out of a sense of .....

Amstar Corp. Vs. Southern Pacific Transport Co. of Texas and

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the least i would grant certiorari and set the case for argument footnotes footnote 1 section 20 11 was repealed in 1978 by pub l 95 473 4 b 92 stat ..... is inconsistent with united states v hougham 364 u s 310 5 l ed 2d 8 1960 where this court said it is a generally accepted rule of law that where .....

LoraIn Journal Co. Vs. Milkovich

Court : US Supreme Court

fact in court 5 j wigmore evidence 1671a pp 806 807 chadbourn rev 1974

Department of Transportation and Development of LA. V.

Court : US Supreme Court

to be provided by a federal agency under the earlier sections of the act page 449 u s 971 972 we designed for the benefit of the public as a whole 84 stat 1895 42 u s c 4621 the substantive provisions

Moorefield Vs. U.S. Secret Service

Court : US Supreme Court

one of nine statutory exemptions exemption 7 a states this section does not apply to matters that are 7 investigatory records investigates are crimes see e g 18 u s c 871 threats against the president are punishable by fine and imprisonment