U.S. Vs. Utah Construction and Mining Co.

U.S. vs Utah Construction and Mining Co.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101260

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101260
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1965
Case Number: 382 U.S. 900
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

U.S.

Respondent

Utah Construction and Mining Co.

Excerpt

u.s. v. utah construction and mining co. - 382 u.s. 900 (1965) u.s. supreme court u.s. v. utah construction and mining co. , 382 u.s. 900 (1965) 382 u.s. 900 united states, petitioner, v. utah construction and mining co. no. 440. supreme court of the united states november 8, 1965 acting solicitor general spritzer, assistant attorney general douglas, morton hollander and david l. rose, for the united states. gardiner johnson and thomas e. stanton, jr., for respondent. petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of claims granted. case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following no. 439.[ u.s. v. utah construction and mining co. 382 u.s. 90 (1965) ]

Full Judgment

U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. - 382 U.S. 900 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. , 382 U.S. 900 (1965)

382 U.S. 900

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO.
No. 440.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1965

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States.

Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted. Case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 439.[ U.S. v. Utah Construction and Mining Co. 382 U.S. 90 (1965) ]

Same Parties U.S. vs Utah Construction and Mining Co. Same Subject MRTP