Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Sorted by: old Year: 1956 Page 1 of about 422 results (0.454 seconds)State of WisconsIn Vs. State of Illinois
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1956
of such amount of water not exceeding an average of 8 500 cubic feet a second in addition to domestic pumpage
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMesarosh Vs. Us
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1956
is decisive indeed the situation page 352 u s 808 811 here is an even stronger one for application of that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheppard Vs. State of Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1956
sheppard v state of ohio 352 u s 910 1956 u s supreme court sheppard v state of ohio 352...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGrunewald Vs. U.S.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1956
not cross examine or be represented page 352 u s 866 868 by counsel may the trial court charge the jury
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalka Prasad Ram Charan Vs. Harish Chandra
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-02-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All25
..... act for the reasons state above the school tribunal constituted under section 8 of the act cannot entertain appeals filed under section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established and ..... board or the state board the school tribunal constituted under section 8 of the maharashtra act cannot entertain appeals filed under section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.S. Sundaram and anr. Vs. Laisram Achou Singh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-02-1956
Reported in: 1956CriLJ1411
..... in the present case the grounds which had been reiterated under section 7 preventive detention act were substantially the same which had been ..... would never have been mentioned in the grounds of detention under section 7 preventive detention act 1950 when they had been expressly held ..... detention were supplied to them under section 7 of that act and grounds nos 3 4 and 8 were the same as those which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.S. Sundaram and anr. Vs. Laisram Achou Singh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-02-1956
Reported in: 1956CriLJ1411
..... in the present case the grounds which had been reiterated under section 7 preventive detention act were substantially the same which had been ..... would never have been mentioned in the grounds of detention under section 7 preventive detention act 1950 when they had been expressly held ..... detention were supplied to them under section 7 of that act and grounds nos 3 4 and 8 were the same as those which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinister-in-charge, Income-tax Vs. Pran Nath Om Parkash.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-02-1956
Reported in: 195630ITR817(Hyd.)
..... commissioner whose decision shall subject to an order under section 66 be final sub section 8 provides that for the disposal of the appeal ..... transferred under sub section 7 the judge of the high ..... the government to exercise the functions of the minister in charge section 33 7 provides that the minister in charge may transfer .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Lal Mallah and ors. Vs. Lall Chand Mallah
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-03-1956
Reported in: AIR1956Cal315,1956CriLJ745
who was the magistrate who actually initiated the proceedings under section 107 criminal p c accordingly it was mr sen who
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChini Mill Mazdoor Union, Ghughli District, Gorakhpur Vs. J.N. Khanna, ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-03-1956
Reported in: AIR1956All367
..... on 30 7 1953 under the powers conferred upon it by sections 3 4 and 8 u p industrial disputes act and in pursuance of the ..... maintaining employment now therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 3 4 and 8 of the u p industrial disputes act 1947 u p ..... of india government order number 615 dated 15 03 1951 and sections 3 4 and 8 of u p industrial disputes act 1947 government order empowers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial