Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Sorted by: old Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 575 results (0.549 seconds)Kashi Prasad Soni Vs. Cc
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
Reported in : (2004)(92)ECC41
..... also admitted by him in his statement dated 17 5 92 under section 108 of customs act 1962 that he had been residing in ..... customs whereby the penalty of rs 10 lakhs was imposed under section 112 of the customs act 3 brief facts of the case ..... appellants submits that the penalty imposed on appellant is not sustainable 8 the departmental representative appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterated the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUms Radio Factory Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
Reported in : (2004)(167)ELT87Tri(Chennai)
adjacent to assessee s factory then modvat credit is available 8 ld ca further submits that m s d engineering p
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. C.M.B. Transport Agencies
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
..... amp regulation act 1992 rendering the goods liable for confiscation under section 111 d of customs act for regularising this illegal import ohri ..... goods as rightly observed by cegat in their order dated 30 8 95 the transactions between dm and ohri and between ohri and ..... commissioner in this case the cegat in their order dated 30 8 95 made it very clear by observing that the collector after .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Indian Management Advisors and
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
..... in respect of the cost of the bottles under the provisions of section 32 1 ii of the it act the cit a re examined the ..... advisers amp leasing p ltd vs dcit 2003 taxindiaonline 36 itat del 8 in oppurgnation the id dr emphatically argued that for claiming depreciation the ..... lease agreement in respect of these bottles with m s unikol on 8 3 91 before acquiring any right in the leased bottles the assessee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindustrial Development Service Vs. Acit
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
..... a consultancy agreement with a swiss company which included the study of the petroleum section analyzing government policies and identifying opportunities for supply of petroleum products to various customers ..... its satisfactory completion 5 maintain close coordination with iesc through effective and timely communication 8 the ao thereafter referred to the clause pertaining to the remuneration to be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPoysha Oxygen Private Ltd. Vs. Dcit
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
and december 31 1947 an amount of rs 1 71 885 from one company and rs 2 56 815 from another
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsstt. Cit Vs. Panachayil Industries
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
Reported in : (2006)7SOT96(Coch.)
therefore the assessee is entitled for the deductions available under sections 80hh and 80 i once it is held that the not manufacturing andhence not eligible for special deduction under sections 80hh amp 80 i and 80j the commissioner appeals also overlooked
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Tex (India) Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
Reported in : (2004)(94)ECC102
28h the term applicant is defined in clause c of section 28e thus i a non resident setting up a joint
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Sudarsanam Spinning Mills
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
Reported in : (2004)(166)ELT461Tri(Chennai)
payment of duty he will not be required to pay 8 of the price of such products cleared without payment of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarsha Industries Vs. Cce
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on : Jan-01-2004
..... amounting to rs 80 168 and imposed equal penalty under section 11 ac interest under section 11 ab was also demanded the commissioner appeals in his ..... this connection they relied on the trade notice no 53 92 dated 8 7 92 wherein it has been clarified that when the goods are ..... goods supplied to ministry of defence trade notice no 53 92 dated 8 7 92 has also been relied by this tribunal in the case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT