Regulate - Judgment Search Results

Samuel and Company, Represented by Its Managing Partner M. Samuel Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1980)1MLJ186

..... appeal has been filed under section 54 of the foreign exchange regulation act 1947 hereinafter referred to as the act against the decision of ..... 1968 3 the firm filed an appeal to the foreign exchange regulation appellate board the board by its order dated 1st january 1975 ..... the foreign exchange regulation appellate board in appeal no 183 of 1968 on its file .....

Chapman Vs. Houston Welfare Rights Organization

Court: US Supreme Court

..... congress we must conclude that an allegation of incompatibility between federal and state statutes and regulations does not in itself give rise to a claim secured by the constitution within the ..... the recital in 1983 specifying suits brought against action under color of any statute ordinance regulation custom or usage further the legislative evolution of 1343 3 cannot support the construction urged .....

Steelworkers Vs. Weber

Court: US Supreme Court

..... into law without substantial support from legislators in both houses who traditionally resisted federal regulation of private business those legislators demanded as a price for their support that management ..... improper manner title vii by contrast was enacted pursuant to the commerce power to regulate purely private decisionmaking and was not intended to incorporate and particularize the commands of .....

Amitava Bhattacharya and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

..... para 66 for the foregoing reasons we hold that rules and regulations framed by the oil and natural gas commission life insurance ..... in the concentration of wealth to the common detriment for the regulation and control of such business and for matters connected therewith ..... 46 to day the government is a welfare state is the regulator and dispenser or special services and provider of large number .....

Tinkari Mondal and ors. Vs. Block Development Officer, Joynagar-1 and ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1980Cal7,83CWN738

ordersalil kumar datta j 1 in this rule the petitioners are claiming that their case for settlement of the railway...

Chhotey Lal Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1979All135

..... equitable distribution of seats amongst those seeking admission and who are eligible under the university regulations such distribution can be on the principle that admission should be available to the best .....

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... board constituted thereunder were challenged the impugned act which had for its object the regulation of the conditions of service of working journalists and other persons employed in ..... sentencing discretion if it was to retain its judicial character exhaustive standardisation or perfect regulation was neither feasible nor desirable 208 moreover over standardisation of the sentencing process tends .....

T.K. Devaraju Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1979KAR2084; (1979)IILLJ473Kant

..... amounts to we therefore think that the mandatory provisions of regulation 5 5 were not complied with we think that reliance ..... though the said decision was rendered while interpreting regulation 5 5 of the indian administrative service indian police service ..... appointment by promotion regulations 1955 which required the recording of reason for supersession .....

Rajendra Prasad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC916; 1979CriLJ792; (1979)3SCC646; [1979]3SCR78

ten most wanted corporations the law affords no means of regularly collecting data on corporate crime and much corporate criminal behaviour

Arun Kumar Mukhopadhyay and ors. Vs. the Institute of Chartered Accoun ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1980Cal40

..... chartered accountants to pay stipends to their students viz the articled clerks b the regulation imposes unreasonable burden and restriction on the chartered accountants and is prejudicial to their ..... and not with reference to the chartered accountants the classification implied in the said regulation was on intelligible differentiation and had rational connection with objectives sought to be achieved .....