Regulate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: regulate Year: 1910 Page 1 of about 776 results (0.035 seconds)Southwestern Oil Co. Vs. Texas
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-04-1910
..... state was not competent to make saying all corporate securities are subject to the same regulations the provision in the fourteenth amendment that no state shall deny to any person within ..... payment of money it may allow deductions for indebtedness or not allow them all such regulations and those of like character so long as they proceed within reasonable limits and general .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLouisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Melton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-31-1910
..... all subjects in one act legislation must necessarily be done in detail and an act regulating railroads violates no constitutional provision because it is made to apply only to railroads indianapolis .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinternational Textbook Co. Vs. Pigg
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-04-1910
..... the business of interstate commerce which was manifestly the principal object of its organization these regulations are clearly a burden and a restriction upon that commerce whether intended as such or ..... seeking to do business in kansas which in the case of interstate business is a regulation of interstate commerce and directly burdens such commerce the state cannot thus burden interstate commerce .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManickam Pillai Vs. Audinarayana Pillai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-12-1910
Reported in: (1911)ILR34Mad47; (1910)20MLJ407
arnold white c j 1 the question which arises for determination in this appeal is whether certain words in clause...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStandard Oil Co. of Kentucky Vs. Tennessee
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-02-1910
..... within the state for lessening competition is not void as a regulation of interstate commerce as to sales made by persons without the ..... which they are supposed to page 217 u s 422 point regulations of the kind that they deal with concern the commerce itself ..... conduct of third persons strangers to the business it does not regulate the business at all it is not even directed against interference .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTicc Vs. Illinois Central R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-10-1910
..... of interstate commerce and subject to control of the interstate commerce commission the act to regulate commerce has delegated to the interstate commerce commission authority to consider where complaint is ..... of coal cars were assailed as unjustly discriminatory in violation of the act to regulate commerce particularly as respected the practice of not taking into consideration foreign railway fuel .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShevlin-carpenter Co. Vs. Minnesota
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-31-1910
..... 102 minn 470 affirmed the facts which involve the constitutionality of a statute of minnesota regulating cutting timber on the public lands of the state and fixing penalties therefor are stated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTicc Vs. Chicago, R.i. and Pacific Ry. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-31-1910
..... the power of the interstate commerce commission extends to the regulation of rates whether the same be old or new notwithstanding ..... courts exercise only the jurisdiction conferred by the act to regulate commerce and not general equity powers and that the matter ..... properly permitted to intervene we have said that the act to regulate commerce was intended to be an effective means for redressing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRai Bahadur Sabu Lata Pershad and anr. Vs. Sheikh Zahur-ud-dIn and ors ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-04-1910
Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.113
1 this appeal is connected with first appeals nos 113 and 114 of 1909 the question involved in them is...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWright Vs. Georgia R. and Banking Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-1910
..... privileges of a corporation which enjoys immunity from taxation or regulation should not be interpreted as including that immunity in the ..... to the thirty six year limitation of the exclusive right regulated by the preceding part of the same section coming now ..... privileges of a corporation which enjoys immunity from taxation or regulation should not be interpreted as including that immunity there is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial