Skip to content


Regulate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: regulate Year: 1910 Page 1 of about 776 results (0.035 seconds)
Apr 04 1910 (FN)

Southwestern Oil Co. Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-04-1910

..... state was not competent to make saying all corporate securities are subject to the same regulations the provision in the fourteenth amendment that no state shall deny to any person within ..... payment of money it may allow deductions for indebtedness or not allow them all such regulations and those of like character so long as they proceed within reasonable limits and general .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 1910 (FN)

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Melton

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-31-1910

..... all subjects in one act legislation must necessarily be done in detail and an act regulating railroads violates no constitutional provision because it is made to apply only to railroads indianapolis .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1910 (FN)

international Textbook Co. Vs. Pigg

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-04-1910

..... the business of interstate commerce which was manifestly the principal object of its organization these regulations are clearly a burden and a restriction upon that commerce whether intended as such or ..... seeking to do business in kansas which in the case of interstate business is a regulation of interstate commerce and directly burdens such commerce the state cannot thus burden interstate commerce .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 1910 (PC)

Manickam Pillai Vs. Audinarayana Pillai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-12-1910

Reported in: (1911)ILR34Mad47; (1910)20MLJ407

arnold white c j 1 the question which arises for determination in this appeal is whether certain words in clause...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 1910 (FN)

Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky Vs. Tennessee

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-02-1910

..... within the state for lessening competition is not void as a regulation of interstate commerce as to sales made by persons without the ..... which they are supposed to page 217 u s 422 point regulations of the kind that they deal with concern the commerce itself ..... conduct of third persons strangers to the business it does not regulate the business at all it is not even directed against interference .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 1910 (FN)

icc Vs. Illinois Central R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-10-1910

..... of interstate commerce and subject to control of the interstate commerce commission the act to regulate commerce has delegated to the interstate commerce commission authority to consider where complaint is ..... of coal cars were assailed as unjustly discriminatory in violation of the act to regulate commerce particularly as respected the practice of not taking into consideration foreign railway fuel .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 1910 (FN)

Shevlin-carpenter Co. Vs. Minnesota

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-31-1910

..... 102 minn 470 affirmed the facts which involve the constitutionality of a statute of minnesota regulating cutting timber on the public lands of the state and fixing penalties therefor are stated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 1910 (FN)

icc Vs. Chicago, R.i. and Pacific Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-31-1910

..... the power of the interstate commerce commission extends to the regulation of rates whether the same be old or new notwithstanding ..... courts exercise only the jurisdiction conferred by the act to regulate commerce and not general equity powers and that the matter ..... properly permitted to intervene we have said that the act to regulate commerce was intended to be an effective means for redressing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 1910 (PC)

Rai Bahadur Sabu Lata Pershad and anr. Vs. Sheikh Zahur-ud-dIn and ors ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-04-1910

Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.113

1 this appeal is connected with first appeals nos 113 and 114 of 1909 the question involved in them is...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1910 (FN)

Wright Vs. Georgia R. and Banking Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-21-1910

..... privileges of a corporation which enjoys immunity from taxation or regulation should not be interpreted as including that immunity in the ..... to the thirty six year limitation of the exclusive right regulated by the preceding part of the same section coming now ..... privileges of a corporation which enjoys immunity from taxation or regulation should not be interpreted as including that immunity there is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //