Skip to content


Regulate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: regulate Year: 1952 Page 1 of about 329 results (0.08 seconds)
Dec 22 1952 (FN)

Ftc Vs. Minneapolis-honeywell Regulator Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-22-1952

..... and ii of the commission s order to cease and desist and commanding minneapolis honeywell regulator company to obey the same and comply therewith 11 in its briefs filed herein the ..... 1952 u s supreme court ftc v minneapolis honeywell regulator co 344 u s 206 1952 federal trade commission v minneapolis honeywell regulator co no 11 argued october 15 16 1952 decided .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 1952 (HC)

Hazari Lal Bhanna Mal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-24-1952

Reported in: AIR1953HP41

..... pradesh cotton cloth dealers licencing order 1948 and the himachal pradesh cotton cloth and yarn regulation of movements order 1948 all of which came into force on 15 12 1948 3 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 1952 (HC)

Edward Ezra and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-29-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Cal263,56CWN875

himself possible and conferred on them an external appearance of regularity these reservation orders or copies of them were never sent

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 1952 (HC)

A.N. Rangaswami and anr. Vs. the Industrial Tribunal, Fort St. George, ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-29-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Mad447; (1953)IILLJ24Mad; (1953)IMLJ315

..... with the previous sanction of the high court make rules to regulate the admission of persons to be advocates of the high ..... trade union and shop committee and in the acts and orders regulating factories mines etc similar considerations might have weighed with the legislature ..... trade union and shop committee and in the acts and orders regulating factories mines etc it is true that among advocates just .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 1952 (SC)

Raja Suriya Pal Singh Vs. the State of U.P. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-02-1952

Reported in: [1952]1SCR1056

..... footnote states it is now considered an universal and fundamental proposition in every well regulated and properly administered government whether embodied in a constitutional from or not that private ..... footnote states it is now considered an universal and fundamental proposition in every well regulated and properly administered government whether embodied in a constitutional from or not that private .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 1952 (HC)

Dattatraya Motiram More Vs. State of Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-18-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Bom311; (1953)55BOMLR323; ILR1953Bom842

chagla c j 1 this is a petition by a resident of jalgaon who is a tax payer of the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 1952 (HC)

Matrumal Sharma and anr. Vs. the Chief Inspector of Shops and Commerci ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-25-1952

Reported in: AIR1952All773

..... kinds of business in the interest of the public safety or regulate the conditions for the manufacture of foodstuffs or chemical products etc ..... shown by its preamble is to provide for holidays and to regulate and lay down conditions of and the hours of employment in ..... outside the purview of section 4 where labour is employed the regulation of the hours of work of the employees or the prescription .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 1952 (HC)

R. Kuppuswamy Gramani Vs. the State of Madras, Represented by the Coll ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-29-1952

Reported in: (1956)2MLJ185

ordersubba rao j1 this is an application under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuing a writ of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 1952 (HC)

R. Kuppuswamy Gramani Vs. State of Madras and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-29-1952

Reported in: AIR1957Mad23

ordersubba rao j 1 this is an application under article 228 of the constitution of india for issuing a writ...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1952 (HC)

Ram Kissen Chandgothia and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-04-1952

Reported in: AIR1952Cal639,56CWN659

..... of power and the differences made have no rational relation to the objectives of the regulation that necessity of judicial interference arises 24 mr atul gupta on behfelf of the petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //