Regulate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: regulate Year: 1912 Page 1 of about 315 results (0.081 seconds)Moti Ram and ors. Vs. Manday Lal
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-19-1912
Reported in: 16Ind.Cas.356
1 the plaint in the suit put of which this appeal arises sets forth that in kasba khatauli district muzaffarnagar...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTicc Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1912
..... would be an illegal preference or discrimination under 3 of act to regulate commerce tariffs are but forms of words and the interstate commerce ..... in the exercise of its powers to administer the act to regulate commerce can look beyond the forms to what caused them and ..... is not governed by the rates published under the act to regulate commerce which apply to the traffic in coal not intended for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEx Parte Webb
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1912
..... state it is unreasonable to suppose that congress would wipe out all its laws and regulations regarding the liquor traffic with indians including those established by treaties and impose upon future ..... expressly reserving to the government of the united states the power to make laws and regulations in the future respecting indians negatives any purpose to repeal by implication the existing laws .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGraham Vs. West Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1912
graham v west virginia 224 u s 616 1912 u s supreme court graham v west virginia 224 u s...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRobinson Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-09-1912
..... also to suits for recovery of rates as discriminatory section 14 of the act to regulate commerce making decisions of the interstate commerce commission as published in the official reports competent ..... the judgment of affirmance he was denied rights specially set up under the act to regulate interstate commerce the first question to be considered is whether consistently with the provisions of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTQuong Wing Vs. Kirkendall
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-22-1912
quong wing v kirkendall 223 u s 59 1912 u s supreme court quong wing v kirkendall 223 u s...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCincinnati Vs. Louisville and Nashville R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-19-1912
cincinnati v louisville nashville r co 223 u s 390 1912 u s supreme court cincinnati v louisville nashville r...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPlummer Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-01-1912
..... assimilated to that of assistant surgeons in the army and did not remain fixed as regulated by 1556 rev stat where an act of congress such as the navy personnel act ..... act of 1898 was passed the pay of officers in the naval service was generally regulated by 1556 rev stat and the pay of an assistant surgeon for shore duty was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDarnell Vs. Indiana
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-23-1912
darnell v indiana 226 u s 390 1912 u s supreme court darnell v indiana 226 u s 390 1912...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTClaimont Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1912
..... upon the treatymaking power of the united states and upon the power of congress to regulate commerce with the indians and was not inconsistent in any substantial sense with the constitutional .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial