Regulate - Judgment Search Results

Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 238 u s 498 499 the use of railroad property is subject to public regulation but a regulation which is so arbitrary and unreasonable as to become an infringement upon the right ..... of invalidity primarily the question is an administrative one and unless the limits of reasonable regulation be transcended the courts may not interfere the commission concluded that the circumstances afforded warrant .....

Connecticut Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

connecticut v massachusetts 282 u s 660 1931 u s supreme court connecticut v massachusetts 282 u s 660 1931...

United States Vs. Utah

Court: US Supreme Court

united states v utah 283 u s 64 1931 u s supreme court united states v utah 283 u s...

Cumberland Oil Co. Vs. Board of Revision

Court: US Supreme Court

cumberland oil co v board of revision 284 u s 23 1931 u s supreme court cumberland oil co v...

Handy and Harman Vs. Burnet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which are affiliated within the meaning of this section shall under regulations to be prescribed by the commissioner with the approval of the ..... shown by the legislative history and was given effect by the regulations contemporaneously promulgated footnote 4 it requires page 284 u s 141 ..... co v united states 67 ct cls 235 footnote 4 treasury regulations 41 art 77 1331 a revenue act of 1921 42 stat .....

State Board of Tax Commissioners Vs. Jackson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... businesses or occupations which may be subjected to special forms of regulation or taxation through an excise or license tax if the selection ..... and equal rate of assessment and taxation and shall prescribe such regulations as shall secure a just valuation for taxation of all property ..... was a public highway the use of which could be so regulated as to promote the ends for which the corporation was .....

Milliken Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of death their characteristic features have been sufficiently indicated by the various treasury regulations dealing with the subject regulation page 283 u s 23 37 under the 1918 act revised august 8 .....

Hoeper Vs. Tax Commission of Wisconsin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... acts in force since 1916 it is obvious that the act does not purport to regulate the status or relationships of any person natural or artificial arbitrary and discriminatory provisions ..... contained in it cannot be justified by calling them special regulations of the persons or relationships which are the object of the discrimination the present case .....

Burnet Vs. Sanford and Brooks Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... benefit of the statutory provision in that regard or of treasury regulations which with respect to certain long term contracts allowed report ..... such basis does not clearly reflect its income may subject to regulations of the commissioner make its return upon the basis upon ..... that it ever filed returns in compliance either with these regulations or section 212 b or otherwise attempted to avail itself .....

Lakshman Mahadev Banker Vs. Ramchandra Kisan Mohite

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1932)34BOMLR117

tyabji j 1 this appeal arises out of a claim in execution proceedings the claimant is the appellant 2 i...