Plaintiff - Judgment Search Results

Special Land Acquisition Officer, Upper Krishna Project Vs. Dyavappa a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(1)KarLJ504

..... increase in market value or delay on part of plaintiff to sue is no ground to refuse specific performance section 20 ..... award passed by the land acquisition officer the respondents claimants herein filed an application under section 18 1 of the land ..... for common appellant for considerable length of time all the claimants respondents are served and unrepresented after thorough evaluation of the .....

Klassic Construction (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2430; 2006(2)ARBLR432(SC); JT2006(7)SC231; 2006(6)SCALE325; (2006)9SCC688

..... adverse possession is claimed documentary evidence to show that house registered in the name of plaintiff and paying house tax by him there was no question of their title over property ..... the defendants are in possession and having refused to grant injunction in favour of the plaintiff held questions formulated by the high court were neither questions of law nor substantial question .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. GaisuddIn Khan and anr.

Court : Karnataka

..... has given oral evidence that the complaint filed against him is a false complaint the plaintiff has discharged the burden the findings of the trial court that there was no reasonable ..... that the prosecution was launched against him without probable cause and malice on facts the plaintiff had produced all necessary documentary material pertaining to the transaction and the criminal case and .....

Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chandrashekara and ...

Court : Karnataka

..... bijapur awarding a sum of rs 58 565 to respondent claimant by putting the liability on the appellant insurance company to ..... before the workmen s compensation commissioner whereas the very same claimant through the very same counsel also filed a m v ..... a c t bijapur and suppressing his occupation mentioned therein the claimant files the present claim petition before the commissioner for workmen .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mumtaz and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... the defendant is intending to enter into the witness box considering the evidence of the plaintiff there may not be any necessity for him to examine any witness on his behalf ..... witnesses would be depending upon the evidence that would be let in by the plaintiff and his witnesses without cross examining the plaintiff and his witnesses it is improper for any court to direct the defendant to .....

Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dasara Honnuraswa ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the defendant is intending to enter into the witness box considering the evidence of the plaintiff there may not be any necessity for him to examine any witness on his behalf ..... witnesses would be depending upon the evidence that would be let in by the plaintiff and his witnesses without cross examining the plaintiff and his witnesses it is improper for any court to direct the defendant to .....

Dashmesh Enterprises Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(4)MPLJ553

..... land no enquiry regarding inclusion of land in master plan was made by plaintiff plaintiff was not aware of any notifications issued by state government whereby suit land was also ..... plan and planning area much before the acquisition of title of same by plaintiff from conduct behaviour and attitude of plaintiff it appeared that despite of having full and complete knowledge of inclusion of disputed .....

The Divisional Commissioner and anr. Vs. H.K. Shivashankaraiah

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(1)KarLJ487

..... be filed by chanabasavaiah or the deceased original plaintiff within the said period of 12 years the courts below were right in holding ..... done just a year or two ago of the date of employment petitioners would be right in stating that the adoption is adopted for the ..... period begins to run from the date of knowledge of plaintiff of such exclusion thus in the instant case since no suit came to .....

Yeribasavana Gouda and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(2)KarLJ198

..... labourer conferred occupancy right in favour of the 1st petitioner legal heir of the original applicant and the said finding of fact has been ..... court fee payable in the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the decree passed by the trial court the court fee payable on ..... held merely because the trial court has held that plaintiff is not in possession and has been excluded from possession there will be .....

Yashoda K. Bhat and anr. Vs. C. Geetha Kamath and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ152

..... order right of transferee to implead in the proceedings as plaintiff held a lis pendens transferee is entitled to come on record ..... of the insurance company being deleted although learned senior counsel for claimants strongly urged before us that in the absence of deleting ..... company is able to show that there is collusion between claimants and the insured no such situation has arisen in the .....