Plaintiff - Judgment Search Results

Kamal Kumari Devi Vs. Narendra Nath Mukherji and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1Ind.Cas.573

..... failed i would here make an observation concerning the general charges of oppression of the plaintiff it does not seem to me to be credible that had the plaintiff been harassed and oppressed as alleged she should not have complained of it had she done so it is impossible to suppose that those who were .....

Banoo Begum Vs. Mir Aun Ali (No. 2)

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR983

..... as to costs 19 counsel certified for purposes of taxation between attorney and client the plaintiff costs practice as to allowing costs of counsel costs of third counsel in a defended ..... in my mind that if the difficulty likely to arise had been placed before the plaintiff s senior counsel he would immediately have returned his brief as it would be obviously .....

Wecker Vs. National Enameling Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... reasonably safe and suitable furnace and pots and railings or other device to protect the plaintiff and was not charged with the duty of placing reasonably safe and sufficient hoisting apparatus nor with the duty of instructing the petitioner in respect to his duties as charged in the complaint and after stating that schenck .....

LeaThe Vs. Thomas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... must have been necessary to the decision of the case so that if the judgment complained of is supported also upon other and independent grounds the judgment must be affirmed or ..... federal questions decided adversely to the plaintiff in error and upon which a decision was necessary to the decision of the case and if the judgment complained of is supported also upon other .....

Chunn Vs. City and Suburban Railway of Washington

Court : US Supreme Court

..... submitted to the jury with appropriate instructions nor is it clear that even if the plaintiff was not free from fault her negligence was the proximate cause of the injury if ..... by reason of the defendant s negligent act in running another car rapidly by the plaintiff had the right to assume that the defendant would not commit such an act of .....

Lawson Vs. United States Mining Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... vein the apex or outcroppings of which extended through the limits of some of the plaintiff s and defendants claims and not several independent veins the ore which was being mined ..... taken from this single broad vein beneath the surface ground of claims belonging to the plaintiff where there is a single broad vein whose apex or outcroppings extend into two adjoining .....

Sauer Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the structure of which plaintiffs complain i am authorized to say that mr justice day concurs in this dissent when the original plaintiff george sauer became the owner of the property there were standing upon it certain frame ..... the judgment under review has denied to the plaintiff any right secured to him by the federal constitution he complains first that he was denied the due process of law secured .....

United States Vs. Heinszen and Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... concession would not dispose of the case or establish that the complainants have a right to the equitable relief for which they pray ..... constitution since to give efficacy to the act would deprive the claimants of their property without due process of law or would appropriate ..... duties after payment as before justly and equitably belonged to the claimants and that the title thereto continued in them as a vested .....

Mercantile Trust Co. Vs. Hensey

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the architect in charge whose decision was to be final both grounds urged by the plaintiff in error in this court for reversal of the judgment are untenable and it must ..... architect but after such certificate has been given there is no provision which bars the plaintiff from showing a violation of the contract in material parts by which he has sustained .....

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Smith, Huggins and Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that this theory of the case having been disproved and the appeal dismissed as to plaintiff in error complainant defendant in error shifted its position and under the broad practice and pleading in the ..... a review of the proceedings is necessary the chancery court held that as between the complainant and plaintiff in error there was no liability upon the part of the latter the rights of .....