Skip to content


Plaintiff - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: plaintiff Year: 1932 Page 1 of about 434 results (0.371 seconds)
May 20 1932 (PC)

Bhupendra Narayan Sinha Vs. Maharaj Bahadur Sinha and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-20-1932

Reported in : AIR1933Cal54

..... of the collectorate nazir d w 1 gopal gobinda mazumdar and the plaintiff s own witnesses such as p w 2 jnanendra mohan sircar p w 5 kristo ..... instance that the sale was adjourned to 4 30 p m and as the plaintiff must have foreseen the circumstances under which the sale would be then held he cannot be permitted to complain it is quite true that once the sale commences the notice under section 8 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 1932 (FN)

ChamplIn Refining Co. Vs. Corporation Comm'n of Oklahoma

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-16-1932

..... s 669 et seq the jurisdiction of the court was properly invoked to determine whether plaintiff was entitled to protection against the shutting down page 286 u s 240 and seizure ..... cause reasonable notice in writing to be served personally on any person firm or corporation complained against in the exercise and enforcement of such jurisdiction said commission is authorized to determine .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 1932 (PC)

DulahIn Jadunath Kuar Vs. Bisheshar Bakhsh Singh

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Mar-08-1932

..... first appeal no 102 of 1929 be dismissed the appellant defendant 1 to pay the plaintiff s costs of the appeal and civil appeal no 24 of 1927 that the second ..... opinion that the case should be remitted to the chief court in order that the plaintiff may have the opportunity of establishing the identity of his gotra with that of raja .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 1932 (PC)

Harekrishna Datta Vs. Gourhari Setna Poddar

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-23-1932

Reported in : AIR1932Cal894

..... in the first suit there can be no question as regards the second suit the plaintiff knew of defendant 1 s purchase of the holding and all about the circumstances so ..... far as they appeared from the record and it is expressly conceded that the plaintiff in this suit has made no case of fraud so far as the second case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 14 1932 (PC)

Jia Bai Vs. Joharmull Bothra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-14-1932

Reported in : AIR1932Cal858

..... a month the defendant was to reconvey all his interest in the premises to the plaintiff forthwith no further claims on either side with reference to matters in this action were ..... time passed 18 it was arranged by consent that judgment should be entered for the plaintiff in the consolidated actions for 750 to include costs it was to be payable as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 1932 (PC)

(Syed) ZainuddIn HossaIn and ors. Vs. (Moulvi) Muhammad Abdur Rahim an ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-01-1932

Reported in : AIR1933Cal102,140Ind.Cas.799

..... so there was no dispossession nor any discontinuance of possession on the part of the plaintiff notwithstanding the permission such possession as the grantor of the leave of license could have ..... to this contention is that there was never any such right asserted adversely to the plaintiff at any time before the solicitor s letter ex c in our opinion the article .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1932 (PC)

Haridas Sadhu Khan Vs. Iswar Ratneswar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-24-1932

Reported in : AIR1933Cal94

..... preliminary objection was raised on behalf of the plaintiff respondent as to the maintainability of the appeal to this court on the ground that ..... set aside it will be open to the plaintiff respondent now to proceed with the suit as against defendant 3 in accordance with law ..... which was entered into as between the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 and which was sought to be enforced by an application .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 1932 (PC)

Harendra Chandra Das and ors. Vs. Nanda Lal Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-02-1932

Reported in : AIR1933Cal98

..... of the learned district judge in the court of appeal below in favour of the plaintiff is in our judgment correct and it is in consonance with the principles underlying the ..... 2 to 5 in the joint property stood altogether on an independent footing and the plaintiff and the agents on behalf of these defendants were negotiating for the sale of these .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 1932 (PC)

Sarat Chandra Ray and ors. Vs. Bhupendra NaraIn Rai

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-16-1932

Reported in : AIR1933Cal199

..... the cross objection is also allowed in part the plaintiff s title to the portion of the land in suit lying on the north of ..... concluded we are unable to hold that the plaintiff has succeeded in establishing his title to the lands or his claim for recovery of ..... defendants 1 and 2 made a petition to the survey authorities complaining inter alia that the western boundary of khetab khan was the flowing river .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 11 1932 (PC)

Abdul Latiff Vs. Gopeswar Chattoraj

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-11-1932

Reported in : AIR1933Cal204

..... render account the ground for this plea it is difficult to make out when the plaintiff was to get a share of the profits and when under his agreement it was ..... the conclusions which we have recorded above are sufficient to establish the position that the plaintiff is entitled to a preliminary decree for accounts for the period in suit on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //