Plaintiff - Year 1936 - Judgments

Mar 30 1936 (PC)

Khitendra Nath Roy Chowdhary Vs. Madaneswar Chatterjee

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-30-1936

Reported in: AIR1937Cal297

..... point of fact the learned chief justice based his decision upon the ground that the plaintiff was in substance seeking to enforce a wagering contract in this case it seems to ..... a declaration and prevent the defendant from actually handling the money i hold that the plaintiff is entitled to the proceeds or prize money allotted to ticket no 08090 and received .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1936 (PC)

Jafar Ali Khan and ors. Vs. Nasimannessa Bibi

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-11-1936

Reported in: AIR1937Cal500

..... obstacle in the way of granting relief in the shape of gift or settlement the plaintiff cannot get any relief until such instrument is set aside and as it has been ..... of limitation as provided by article 91 sch 1 limitation act in our judgment the plaintiff had full knowledge of the document hebanama and had full knowledge of the contents of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 1936 (PC)

Abdul Kader Chaudhury Vs. Upendra Lal Barua and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-23-1936

Reported in: AIR1936Cal711

..... property of the school the onus is on the defendants who want to deprive the plaintiff of his legal rights by taking the said plea they must prove all the elements ..... of fry j it may very well be that in the year 1928 when the plaintiff s son was the secretary of the school the plaintiff s son believed that the portion which was being enclosed then was a part of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1936 (PC)

Sadhiram Atoi Vs. Kunja Behari Banerjee

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-10-1936

Reported in: AIR1936Cal715

..... the defendant has given evidence before any evidence on this question was led by the plaintiff we think it right that the case should be sent back to the court below ..... be convenient to deal in the first place with some of the illegalities or irregularities complained of on behalf of the plaintiff and to leave out for the present for separate consideration here after one question of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 1936 (PC)

Mati Lal Daga and ors. Vs. (Sri Sri) Iswar Radha Damodar Chandra Jew T ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-06-1936

Reported in: AIR1936Cal727

..... coal up to the pit s mouth 41 it is complained that in the present case the defendants acted in a very high handed and fraudulent ..... 1928 there was an order of discharge on 14th september 1928 the plaintiff through the shebaits wrote to the dagas messrs harsook das balkissen das co a letter through their pleader marked ex 2 d complaining that they had broken many of the terms of the lease of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1936 (PC)

Secy. of State Vs. Kamala Ranjan Roy

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-27-1936

Reported in: AIR1937Cal94

..... part of the judgment the possession of the plaintiff was by virtue of a sale for arrears of revenue was not for the purpose ..... decrees passed by it in favour of the plaintiff in the suits in which these appeals have arisen are set aside and the decision ..... relied upon by the learned advocate for the plaintiff respondent in support of the position that no liability attached to the purchaser at a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1936 (PC)

Sreemati Dayamoyee Dassya Vs. Jatindra Chandra Das and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-31-1936

Reported in: AIR1937Cal23

..... the will which were conditions precedent to the vesting of the legacy is that the plaintiff s suit must be dismissed the appeal is allowed the decision and decree passed by ..... the court below against which this appeal is directed are set aside and the plaintiff s suit is dismissed with costs throughout including costs in this court defendant 1 appellant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 1936 (PC)

L.A. Creet Vs. Firm Gangaraj-gulraj and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-22-1936

Reported in: AIR1937Cal129

..... for the above reasons subject to the variation that possession will not be restored to plaintiff before one year from the arrival of the records in the lower court the appeal ..... in effecting improvements in the colliery should be set off against the sum due to plaintiff for mesne profits this argument would have prevailed if the possession of defendants was not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 1936 (PC)

Bengal Young Men's Zamindary Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Nritya Gopa ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-30-1936

Reported in: AIR1937Cal159

..... relief of an incidental nature which flows from the main relief is claimed by the plaintiff on payment of proper court fees it was particularly necessary here as the claim would ..... not ordinarily contemplate a refund of money on account of excess payments made by the plaintiff but there was nothing wrong in instituting a suit of a more comprehensive character in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 21 1936 (PC)

Surjya Kumar Naik Vs. Bijoy Kumar Hazra

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-21-1936

Reported in: 170Ind.Cas.672

..... interpreted so that the advantage of the section cannot be claimed on behalf of the plaintiff unless the transaction was carried out bona fide as pointed out in mulla s insolvency ..... position clear 15 the only question which remains therefore is one of fact whether the plaintiff in the present case acted bona fide in spite of the english decisions and in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Plaintiff - Judgment Search Results