Offensive - Judgment Search Results

V. Gopalakrishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Reported in: (2006)(3)SLJ90CAT

1 all these cases are identical therefore they are disposed of by this common order with the consent of the...

Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. and anr. Vs. K. Adireddy

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(4)ALD501

b prakash rao j 1 heard sri v t m prasad the learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant corporation...

Soni Kirit Jivan Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2006)3GLR2234

..... to release a convicted person on probation when he was found guilty of committing any offense not punishable with death or imprisonment of life there was no criminal history there was .....

Vinoda Nand Jha Vs. the State of Jharkhand,

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2007(1)BLJR689; 2007CriLJ1979

..... 22 criminal procedure code 1973 section 197 prosecution for causing insult by caste name and hurling other offensive remarks sanction is necessary only when public servant is acting or purporting to act in .....

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for then unspecified crimes after another year he was charged with conspiracy to commit offenses triable by military commission in habeas and mandamus petitions hamdan asserted that the military ..... the plurality contends the murder of president lincoln was charged as a distinct separate offense the foregoing quoted language of the charging document unequivocally establishes otherwise moreover though i .....

Lopez Vs. Gonzales

Court: US Supreme Court

..... limited to south dakota cases while federal law typically treats trafficking offenses as felonies and nontrafficking offenses as misdemeanors several states deviate significantly from this pattern footnote ..... that will have a significant effect on removal proceedings involving state possession offenses federal law treats possession of large quantities of controlled substances as felonious .....

Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Vs. Collins (Respondent)

Court: House of Lords

..... to interfere as little as possible with freedom of expression parliament has criminalised only grossly offensive messages to have found the respondent s messages to be inoffensive would have been ..... adopted as a badge of honour old contemptibles there can be no yardstick of gross offensiveness otherwise than by the application of reasonably enlightened but not perfectionist contemporary standards to .....

Dixon Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in the definitions of crimes contained in the code its currency and its existence in offenses outside the criminal code suggest the desirability of clarification had congress intended to adopt ..... 30 1769 when congress began to enact federal criminal statutes it presumptively intended for those offenses to be subject to this defense moreover congress presumptively intended for the burdens of .....

Clark Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s consideration of observation evidence indicating state of mind at the time of a criminal offense conventional mens rea evidence as distinct from professional mental disease or capacity evidence going to ..... convicted even if the defendant s conduct satisfied all the formal elements of a higher offense california a jurisdiction with which the concept has traditionally been associated understood it to .....

Washington Vs. Recuenco

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the defendant was sentenced whereas here the jury returned a guilty verdict only on the offense of second degree assault and an affirmative answer to the sentencing question whether respondent ..... error analysis applied to these errors because an instruction that omits an element of the offense does not necessarily render a criminal trial fundamentally unfair or an unreliable vehicle for determining .....