Offensive - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: offensive Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 72 results (0.011 seconds)Voltas Employees Union Vs. Voltas Ltd. and N.J. Gajbhiye, Commissioner ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-22-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)BomCR425; (2002)2BOMLR598; (2002)IIILLJ9Bom
1 rule returnable forthwith by consent ofthe parties rule called out and heard respondentno 2 is not served and at...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuldip Kumar S/O Sh. Makhuli Ram Sharma Vs. State of Jandk Through P/S ...
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Feb-22-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)JKJ577
s k gupta j 1 aggrieved by order dated 27th september 2001 formulated by sessions judge udhampur in dismissing the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujco Carriers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-18-2002
Reported in: [2002]256ITR50(Guj)
r k abichandani j 1 the income tax appellate tribunal ahmedabad bench c has referred the following question for the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChonari Sulekha, W/O. C. Hamza Vs. State of Kerala Represented by the ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-19-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)KLT374
radhakrishnan j 1 this writ of habeas corpus is preferred by thewife of c hamsa who is detained under sections...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRef. by President
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-28-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC87; (2002)8SCC237
acts rules orders constitution of india articles 69 69 2 75 79 83 85 85 1 85 2 87 88...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGirdhar Shankar Tawade Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-24-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC2078; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)360; (2002)3BOMLR604; 2002CriLJ2814; 2002(2)Crimes360(SC); I(2002)DMC780SC; JT2002(4)SC357; 2002MPLJ5(SC); RLW2002(4)SC542; 2002(4)SCALE44; (2
banerjee j 1 maintainability of a charge under section 498 a of thecode by reason of an order of acquittal...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevender Pal Singh Vs. State National Capital Territory of Delhi and a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-22-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC1661; 2002CriLJ2034; 2002(2)Crimes133(SC); 97(2002)DLT57(SC); JT2002(3)SC264; 2002(3)SCALE139; (2002)5SCC234; [2002]2SCR767
order of the court 36 the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court standsconfirmed by dismissal of the appeal...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVikram Reddy, Presently Lodged at Central Jail, Aguada, Sinquerim, Bar ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-25-2002
Reported in: 2002BomCR(Cri)499; (2002)2BOMLR768
p v hardas j 1 the appellant who stands convicted for anoffence punishable under sections 20 b ii and 22...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuldip Singh and Ram Singh and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2002
Reported in: 67(2003)DLT17
..... and 460 of indian penal code and section 313 of criminal procedure code appellants held guilty of offense punishable under sections 302 read with sections 34 386 and 460 appellant employed with deceased .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarris Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
..... that as a matter of statutory interpretation brandishing is an element of a separate offense an offense for which he had not been indicted or tried at the sentencing hearing the ..... heightens the loss of liberty and represents the increased stigma society attaches to the offense consequently facts that trigger an increased mandatory minimum sentence warrant constitutional safeguards actual sentencing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial