Offensive - Judgment Search Results

Universal Imports Agency and anr. Vs. the Chief Controller of Imports ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC41; [1961]1SCR305

subba rao j 1 these four petitions are filed under art 32 of the constitution forquashing the orders of the...

Kinsella Vs. Singleton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as applied to civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces overseas and charged with noncapital offenses 164 f supp 707 and the government appealed we noted probable jurisdiction and ..... military an unreviewable discretion to exercise jurisdiction over civilian dependents simply by downgrading the offense thus stripping the accused of his constitutional rights and protections by allowing this .....

Schaffer Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses such defendants may be charged in one or more counts together or separately and ..... or second where they participate in the same serious of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses these four petitioners did not participate in one act or transaction as evidenced by .....

Parr Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states mail count 20 charged that petitioners conspired to commit the offense set out in the first count and committed specific overt ..... conspired and agreed among themselves and with others to commit the offenses which are fully described and set out in the first count ..... entries but the fact is those mailings were not charged as offenses in the indictment doubtless because they were as shown between .....

Wyatt Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a man has prostituted his own wife he has committed an offense against both her and the marital relation and we have today ..... the spousal privilege belongs both to the person charged with the offense as we held in hawkins and also to the witness moreover ..... not claim the privilege where he is charged with certain kinds of offenses committed against his spouse and the court believes that the instant .....

United States Vs. Mersky

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the regulations thereunder the information was dismissed solely because its allegations did not state an offense under 1304 as amplified by the regulations the statute and regulations are so inextricably ..... regulations and the information was dismissed solely because its allegations did not state an offense under 1304 as amplified by the regulations when the statute and regulations are so .....

Machinists Local Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this reasoning negates the conceded rule that enforcement of a tainted contract is a continuing offense the court s reasoning inconsistently would at once both recognize and deny any means of ..... proving the continuing offense analytical curiosity provokes the query whether such an illegal contract openly posted in the plant .....

Grisham Vs. Hagan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... p 361 u s 234 which involves the application of the same article to noncapital offenses committed by dependents accompanying soldiers stationed outside the united states and to no 21 ..... supra it decided that the application of the article to civilian dependents charged with capital offenses while accompanying servicemen outside the united states was unconstitutional as violative of article iii and .....

Elkins Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court the petitioners were indicted in the united states district court in oregon for the offense of intercepting and divulging telephone communications and of conspiracy to do so 47 u s ..... any person is intentionally deprived of his constitutional rights those responsible have committed no ordinary offense a crime of this nature if subtly encouraged by failure to condemn and punish certainly .....

Thompson Vs. City of Louisville

Court: US Supreme Court

..... found guilty in the police court of louisville kentucky of two offenses loitering and disorderly conduct the ultimate question presented to us ..... of the jukebox or that his conduct was boisterous or offensive to anyone present at the close of his evidence petitioner ..... there is no testimony that petitioner raised his voice used offensive language resisted the officers or engaged in any conduct of .....