Offensive - Judgment Search Results

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. K. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1982CriLJ641

..... forest act and rules 4 and 5 of andhra pradesh forest offenses compounding and prosecution rules 1969 lorry belonging to respondent illegally ..... that respondent did not apply for his willingness to compound forest offense nor did he give any written undertaking in that regard ..... as required by rule 5 by forest offenses rules mere absence of lawyer to assist respondent in cross .....

Lt. Col. K.C. Sud, New Delhi Vs. S.C. Gudimani, New Delhi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1982CriLJ2779; 20(1981)DLT302; ILR1981Delhi680

..... private persons b by the police i on police report in case of cognizable offenses and non cognizable offenses investigated under section 155 and ii on a complaint in cases in which .....

Suresh Trading Company Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1981]48STC207(Bom)

..... certificate registering authority should take steps for canceling registration under proviso to section 22 6 offense is committed in case of omission with regard to intimation of discontinuation business and ..... not application for cancellation of registration in present case no such offense had been committed court answered in favour of assessee in the said visit report .....

Shaik Layak Vs. the State

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1981CriLJ954

..... and 27 of indian evidence act petitioner arrested under section 379 for committing pick pocketing offenses application for grant of bail filed metropolitan magistrate granted bail on condition that accused should .....

Albernaz Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the object of the attempt or conspiracy this provision proscribes conspiracy to commit any offense defined in subchapter i including conspiracy to distribute marihuana which is specifically prohibited ..... a generally similar function of identifying congressional intent to impose separate sanctions for multiple offenses arising in the course of a single act or transaction in determining whether .....

Spaziano Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... murder or waiving the florida statute of limitations with respect to the lesser included noncapital offenses of second degree murder third degree murder and manslaughter the statute had run on ..... this case of the issue concerning petitioner s entitlement to instructions on lesser included noncapital offenses i would grant the petition for certiorari and give the case plenary consideration see .....

illinois Vs. Zegart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the successive prosecutions would not have been for the same offense within the meaning of the double jeopardy clause 447 u ..... necessarily proved in order to convict respondent of the traffic offense of driving across the median the state was barred from ..... the statute treated reckless homicide as an optional lesser included offense in cases involving involuntary manslaughter by automobile 447 u s .....

Ralston Vs. Robinson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... such a determination at any time whether or not an offender has committed a subsequent offense we reject this extraordinarily broad interpretation and any interpretation that would grant the bureau ..... statute invests the court with the power to modify conditions in light of the subsequent offense the dissent reviews selective portions of the legislative history but never addresses a critical .....

Jones Vs. Helms

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the language of the federal constitution that suggests that a person who has committed an offense punishable by imprisonment has an unqualified federal right to leave the jurisdiction prior to ..... child abandonment to a felony if a resident offender leaves the state after committing the offense presumably the commission of the misdemeanor of child abandonment would not justify a permanent restriction .....

Weaver Vs. Graham

Court: US Supreme Court

..... forbidding state legislature to enact a statute affect ing the prosecution or punishment for any offense previously committed footnote 6 petitioner estimated that his tentative expiration date under fla stat 944 ..... 1979 is merely procedural because it does not alter the punishment prescribed for petitioner s offense brief for respondent 13 17 18 this contention is incorrect given the uncontested fact .....